1 / 18

PlanetLab Deployment and Analysis of Network Coordinate Systems

PlanetLab Deployment and Analysis of Network Coordinate Systems. Fenglin Liao Keshava Subramanya Veljko Pejovic {fenglin,keshava,veljko} @ cs.ucsb.edu. Contents. Motivation for the Project Project Objectives Experimental Setup Challenges Results Conclusions Guidelines for the future

Audrey
Download Presentation

PlanetLab Deployment and Analysis of Network Coordinate Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PlanetLab Deployment and Analysis of Network Coordinate Systems Fenglin Liao Keshava Subramanya Veljko Pejovic {fenglin,keshava,veljko} @ cs.ucsb.edu

  2. Contents • Motivation for the Project • Project Objectives • Experimental Setup • Challenges • Results • Conclusions • Guidelines for the future • Credits

  3. Motivation for the project • Non-availability of exhaustive NC system comparison • Need for relevant metric for comparing NC systems • Need for neutral analysis of NC systems under various criteria *

  4. A tale of 2 NC Systems • Vivaldi: • Simple, adaptive, distributed, lightweight • GNP: • Centralized (uses landmarks), static

  5. Project Objectives • Accuracy • RTT vs. Calculated distances • Effect of node “distance” • Convergence time • Robustness • Effect of network traffic • Impact of malicious nodes • Stability • Behavior of system when nodes are joining and leaving (Vivaldi) • Impact of Landmarks leaving the system (GNP)

  6. Experimental Setup • Selected 100+ on PlanetLabs • Sorted and selected from every class based on RTT • Ran Pyixda - a Java implementation of Vivaldi based closely on original MIT Paper (Azureus) • GNP implementation by T. S. Eugene Ng, author of the original paper • Constructed full ping mesh with periodic ping measurements • Modified code of Pyxida, created daemons, mined log file data using scripts, analyzed data using Matlab • Total run time of over 150+ hours

  7. Challenges • Most importantly, being comprehensive, relevant • Bringing dissimilar NC systems to comparable platform • Large amounts of data to be processed • Need to move massive amounts of Data to PL • Killed some ‘csil’ machines in the process • Angry emails from local sys-admins due to “ssh probe traffic”

  8. Results - Accuracy • GNP, as expected, has better accuracy • Increasing no. of dimensions of Vivaldi improves performance but does not beat GNP • 65% of Vivaldi, and 75% of GNP measurements have relative error less than 0.2, hence, fairly accurate!

  9. Results - Accuracy: RRL and CNL • RRL: Relative Rank Loss • how well a network coordinate scheme respects the relative ordering of all pairs of neighbors (Lua et al) • CNL: Closest Neighbor Loss • Percentage of nodes whose estimated closest neighbor differs from the actual one (Lua et al) • Provides a NC independent platform for analysis of accuracy • Most applications need just these two, simplifies API set

  10. RRL: Vivaldi vs. GNP • Lower RRL in Vivaldi • Lower CNL with GNP • Spikes in GNP for some nodes

  11. Results - Accuracy: Effect of Distance • Vivaldi overestimates closer node distances • GNP underestimates far away nodes

  12. Results - Accuracy: Convergence time • Most nodes converged (err<0.2) within 2 hours for Vivaldi • GNP – Static (calculation was CPU intensive)

  13. Results - Robustness: Effect of Network traffic • Selected 8 nodes and ran Vivaldi and GNP • Subjected the network to heavy traffic • Compared measurements before, during and after traffic • Result: • No significant changes for Vivaldi and GNP • Possibly because both are really light weight on the network

  14. Results - Robustness: Impact of Malicious Nodes • Set up a stable ring of 8 nodes • Hacked the Vivaldi code to send out constant “GossipMessages” with very large values of coordinates • Added 3 malicious nodes to the network • Vivaldi blown away by the attack • GNP Malicious Landmark beyond the scope of this work, but Landmarks are usually trusted nodes Malicious Nodes injected at T=2.5h

  15. Results - Stability: Effect of Network Churn 3 Nodes Left 3 Nodes Joined • Vivaldi reacts more to node churning, but recovers soon • Nodes leaving GNP NC have no effect on other nodes • Landmarks leaving the network has almost no effect on GNP stability • “Back-up” landmarks are often available to ensure system stability during landmark failure (called candidate landmarks) • If the number of available landmarks go below minimum threshold, NC system fails to continue operation NC System Confidence factor CDF GNP Relative Error 9 to 15 Landmarks

  16. Conclusions • GNP is generally more accurate but both are still not accurate enough • CNL performance of both systems are highly inaccurate - more than 50% error • GNP makes really high RRL on some nodes, hence not very useful for applications relying on RRL • Based on distance based measurements, Vivaldi is suited for large networks and GNP for smaller and denser networks • Vivaldi takes about 2.5 hrs to converge. Using it on high churn networks may not be ideal

  17. Guidelines for the future • A hybrid approach: Vivaldi like, but with periodic random ping to improve accuracy • Make light weight (a C implementation) • Multiple implementations (two running - choose one or average estimated RTT) • Log files to “remember” coordinates of last run (brings down convergence time) • Vivaldi should guard itself against malicious nodes by using some reputation mechanisms • Make mobile/wireless nodes “read-only”

  18. Thank You Questions/Comments? • Credits • Ledlie, Pietzuch, Parker, http://pyxida.sourceforge.net/ • T. S. E. Ng and H. Zhang. Predicting Internet network distance with coordinates-based approaches • F. Dabek, R. Cox, F. Kaashoek, and R. Morris. Vivaldi: A Decentralized Network Coordinate System. In SIGCOMM, August 2004 • Network Traffic Generator: http://sourceforge.net/projects/traffic • Harsha Alagud (UCSB) – For his Java expertise and cheerful helping hand

More Related