1 / 18

Great Lakes Commission 2004 Annual Meeting Toronto, Ontario

Great Lakes Commission 2004 Annual Meeting Toronto, Ontario Joint Canada/United States Study Binational study partnership – Canadian and U.S. Federal departments and agencies: Transportation policy and economics Navigation-related infrastructure engineering Environmental science

Ava
Download Presentation

Great Lakes Commission 2004 Annual Meeting Toronto, Ontario

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Great Lakes Commission2004 Annual MeetingToronto, Ontario

  2. Joint Canada/United States Study • Binational study partnership – Canadian and U.S. Federal departments and agencies: • Transportation policy and economics • Navigation-related infrastructure engineering • Environmental science Memorandum of Cooperation (May 2003) • Signed between Transport Canada and the U.S. Department of Transportation Water Resources Development Act 1999 • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  3. Study Framework Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  4. Study Partners • Transport Canada • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • U.S. Department of Transportation • St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corp. • Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corp. • Environment Canada • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Transport Canada • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Binational representation of all study partners – Engineering, Economics, Environment Steering Committee: Management Team: Study Team: Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  5. Study Objectives Principal focus on sustaining and optimizing the existing GLSLS infrastructure based on the system’s current configuration; evaluation of infrastructure modifications are not part of the study • Evaluate costs and benefits of continuing to maintain the existing GLSLS infrastructure:Infrastructure condition, reliability and performance • Assess current and future GLSLS infrastructure needs:Engineering, economic and environmental aspects associated with navigation system operation and maintenance • Identify factors and trends affecting commercial navigation on the GLSLS system:Domestic and international marine transportation industries, evolving intermodal linkages and transportation technologies Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  6. GLSLS System – Marine Infrastructure Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  7. GLSLS System – Marine Transportation • Integral component of North America’s transportation infrastructure: • Serves 15 major international ports and some 50 regional ports; links to nearly 30 rail lines and more than 40 provincial/interstate highways • Important intermodal connections within industrial centres contributing to transportation options: • Provides a competitive advantage in the movement of commodities for a wide range of industries • Critical economic generator facilitating domestic and international trade: • Moves upwards of 200 million tonnes annually – domestic, transborder and overseas import/export trades Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  8. Aging infrastructure >>> rising costs: Increasingly critical to plan for future operation and maintenance Broader factors: Market opportunities, modal integration, trade facilitation, sustainable transportation, congestion mitigation GLSLS Lock Systems – 17 Locks Montreal-Lake Ontario – 5 Canadian and 2 US locks (1959) Welland Canal – 8 Canadian locks (1932) Soo Locks – 2 US locks; Poe (1968) and MacArthur (1943) GLSLS System – Study Context Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  9. Study Tasks and Activities • To meet the study objectives, it is necessary to complete both a quantitative and qualitative assessment: • Engineering aspects • Economic aspects • Environmental aspects Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  10. Engineering Aspects • Determine basic condition of existing GLSLS infrastructure and rank it relative to other similar facilities and components for system-wide basis of comparison • Review historic infrastructure operation and maintenance costs and categorize infrastructure performance factors • Undertake analytical engineering reliability modeling for those major infrastructure components identified as most critical (in relation to engineering criteria and level of service criteria) • Project future costs associated with GLSLS operation and maintenance based on current infrastructure condition and reliability • Evaluate alternative maintenance and rehabilitation scenarios for existing GLSLS infrastructure (based on the system’s current configuration) Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  11. Economic Aspects • Analyze (qualitatively) essential physical, institutional and economic characteristics of the GLSLS system • Assess data and trends: traffic flows; fleet characteristics; markets and industries; and transportation rates • Forecasting: traffic flows for major cargoes currently carried on GLSLS; potential additional and/or new cargoes that could be moved on the system (based on its current configuration); future capacity of GLSLS-serving fleet; marine industry competitiveness • Modeling: evaluate socio-economic costs and benefits for alternative maintenance and rehabilitation scenarios for existing GLSLS infrastructure (based on the system’s current configuration) Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  12. Environmental Aspects • Characterize environmental conditions of key resources potentially impacted by navigation-related activities on the GLSLS (water quality, water level variations, sediment quality, wetlands, fisheries, species at risk and of special concern) • Assess (qualitatively) environmental implications of maintenance and rehabilitation scenarios for the existing GLSLS infrastructure (defined by engineering and economics aspects) • Provide environmental information to support work in relation to engineering and economic aspects of the study • Identify and define appropriate methodology for assessing environmental impacts of future GLSLS navigation-related activities Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  13. Stakeholder Engagement • Study partners recognize importance of ensuring that both public and private interests are heard – engineering, economics and environmental aspects • Study will incorporate stakeholder engagement to: • Inform interested parties – study scope, objectives, tasks and activities • Serve as a platform for dialogue and information exchange – opportunity to share views and provide comments in relation to study • Listen to stakeholder comments Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  14. Stakeholder Engagement Process • Management Team has obtained services of facilitator to lead stakeholder engagement process: • St. Lawrence Economic Development Council (SODES) • Great Lakes Commission (GLC) • Establishforum for dialogue and information exchange • Set up points of contact • Conduct series of stakeholder meetings in Canada and U.S. • Solicit stakeholder comments and views – gather information and knowledge (call for submissions) • Document stakeholder feedback and input • Report to Management Team Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  15. Stakeholder Meetings • Five stakeholder meetings in June/July 2004, two in Canada and three in the United States: • June 3 Montreal, Quebec (32 attendees. 6 presentations) • June 8 St. Catharines, Ontario (18 attendees, 7 presentations) • June 15 Duluth, Minnesota (33 attendees, 9 presentations) • July 6 Clayton, New York (300 attendees, 40 presentations) • July 14 Chicago, Illinois (50 attendees, 30 presentations) • Stakeholder submission/brief summary due in early October Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  16. Stakeholder Meeting Results • Primary attendees/participants: • Environmental Groups (Governmental & Private) • Local Interest/Property Owner Groups • Commercial Shipping Interests • Port Authorities/Directors • Tribal Interests • Fishery Interests (Governmental & Private) • Economic Development Interests Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  17. Stakeholder Meeting Results • Recurring Themes/Comments: • Study should not entertain seaway expansion or season extension • Invasive Species • Impacts to Fisheries/Recreation • Seaway is a critical component of the overall navigation system • Condition of existing infrastructure is a concern (safety & reliability) • Importance of reliable waterborne navigation system will become more critical as overland transportation routes become overtaxed • Alternative future commercial transportation scenarios exist which would rely on GLSLS navigation system (short sea shipping) Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

  18. Study Information • Binational study website: www.glsls-study.com • Contact Information: United StatesCanada • Management Team: Dave Wright Marc Fortin (313) 226-3573 (613) 998-1843 • Stakeholder Engagement: David Knight Marc Gagnon (734) 971-9135 (418) 648-4572 Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Study

More Related