1 / 23

"Energy Efficiency in IPPC-installations" 21 and 22 October 2004 Vienna

Modern Combined Cycle Power Plants – Improvement of a high efficient and clean technology O. Kreyenberg, H. Schütz, H. Friede Siemens PG. "Energy Efficiency in IPPC-installations" 21 and 22 October 2004 Vienna. Agenda. Market Drivers. Reference Power Plant Product Overview

Ava
Download Presentation

"Energy Efficiency in IPPC-installations" 21 and 22 October 2004 Vienna

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Modern Combined Cycle Power Plants – Improvement of a high efficient and clean technologyO. Kreyenberg, H. Schütz, H. Friede Siemens PG "Energy Efficiency in IPPC-installations" 21 and 22 October 2004 Vienna

  2. Agenda Market Drivers Reference Power Plant Product Overview - Steam Power Plant - Combined Cycle Power Plant Reference Power Plant Design Philosophy Design Targets References

  3. Efficiency Risk Guarantee* Overall Construction Time Price The Market Conditions Have Changed Dramatically in the Power IndustryOver the Last 10 Years Market Conditions Years * technical warranties (NOx, et. al.), delivery time

  4. Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis Parameters influenced by the supplier Parameters Costs Investment costs Financing costs Service life Demolition costs Reduction of specificinvestment costs Global sourcing Modular design Short delivery times Capital costs Live Cycle Costs Fuel contractconditions Efficiency Fuel Costs High process and component efficiencies Personnel costs Consumables/waste Spare parts Maintenance Optimized level ofautomation High availability Ease of maintenance Operating costs

  5. Reference PowerPlantProduct Overview

  6. Varioplant 300 300- 450 MW 700 500- 750 MW 900 800- 1000 MW Gas/Oil Single-Shaft 50 Hz 100, 290, 400 MW Multi-Shaft 50 Hz 200, 580, 800 MW60 Hz 200, 540, 730 MW 60 Hz 100, 270, 365 MW Our Reference Power Plants are Focused on International Main Market Demand for IPP’s Coal/Oil Customized... of the shelf... Components, Islands and Turnkey Gas/Oil

  7. Multi-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Econopac Arrangement • ECONOPAC • Gas turbine • Gas turbine generator • Air intake • Exhaust gas system • Fuel system • Electrical package (SFC/SEE) • GT - Auxiliaries • Fire protection • Options

  8. Multi-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Power Island Arrangement • POWER ISLAND • Econopac • Steam turbine • Steam turbinegenerator incl. SEE • Heat recoverysteam generator • Major pumps • Condenser • Critical valves • ST - Auxiliaries • Cycle optimization • Fuel gas pre-heater • Options

  9. Multi-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Turnkey (Cooling Tower) • TURNKEY • Power Island • Fuel supply systems • Cooling systems • Water treatment • Raw water system • Waste water system • Tanks • Cranes/hoists • Buildings/structures • Fire protection • Plant piping/valves • Plant electrical • Further options

  10. Multi-Shaft Combined Cycle Power Plant Turnkey with House (Cooling Tower) • TURNKEY • Power Island • Fuel supply systems • Cooling systems • Water treatment • Raw water system • Waste water system • Tanks • Cranes/hoists • Buildings/structures • Fire protection • Plant piping/valves • Plant electrical • Further options

  11. Reference PowerPlantDesign Philosophy

  12. Evolution of Combined Cycle Power Plant Efficiency Steam cycle Single pressure Dual pressure Tripple pressure with reheat Net efficiency(%) 60 Turbine inlettemp. (ISO) Fuel preheating Life steampressure Life steamtemperature 1160°C — 100 bar 520°C 1250°C 200°C 160 bar 580°C 58 1230°C 130°C 125 bar 565°C 1230°C 130°C 110 bar 550°C 1120°C — 80 bar 520°C 1190°C 200°C 110 bar 540°C 56 1050°C — 75 bar 510°C 54 1000°C — 60 bar 485°C 52 960°C — 50 bar 460°C Fuel gas firing ISO ambient conditions (15°C, 1013 mbar, 60% rel. humidity) Condenser back pressure 0.04 bar 50 48 46 1983/84 1987/88 1990/91 1992/93 1994/95 1996/97 1998/99 2001 2005/06 Year of commissioning Source: Siemens Gas Turbines

  13. Economical Evaluation Factors

  14. . mKL Power Output, Efficiency, NOx-Emission and Cooling Air Demand versus Combustion Temperature Boundary conditions: The same technology for blade cooling, combustion chamber cooling and burner. Ex- haust gas 102% Gas turbine NOX Tcomb. Fuel 2% Heat recovery steam generator Combustion chamber Combustion air 80% NOX Air intake 100% Electricity Generator Cooling air 20% TCool.-air hGUD Steam turbine Circulating water Electricity TIT Generator Condenser 1570°C 1700°C TCombustion

  15. Efficiency Improvements due to Increasing the Number of Pressure Stages Temperature curves in aheat recovery steam generator Efficiency increase D h net [%-points] Temperature [°C] 1-pressure process 2-pressure process 3-pressure process 125 bar/565 °C28 bar/565 °C4 bar/235 °C 3 600 125 bar/565 °C29 bar/320 °C5 bar/200 °C 500 Exhaust gas 400 2 80 bar/540 °C5 bar/210 °C 300 2.8 2.1 1 200 1.6 100 65 bar/540 °C 54.1% 0 0 Transfered heat 1-pressure 2-pressure 3-pressurewithoutreheat 3-pressure withreheat

  16. Quick Start up Increases Plant Utilisation Factor... GT at full load/Bypass System closed Start-up after 8h Shut-down Plant start-up with improved equipment Typical plant start-up Plant Load [MW] ≈ 40 min ≈ 90 min Time

  17. Limiting Values for Flue Gas Emissions

  18. Relationship between turbine inlet temperature and NOx emissions A temperature increase by 70K doubles the NOx- emissions !

  19. Design Targets

  20. One the way to the Technical leadership nowtomorrow Efficiency 58%* > 59% TIT** 1230°C 1290°C NOx 25 ppm 9 – 15 ppm * depending on cooling conditions ** turbine inlet temperature Details on additional measures will be presented at a VDI Symposium in Leverkusen 23./24. November 2004

  21. References

  22. Mainz-Wiesbaden, Germany Combined Cycle Power Plant V94.3Awith Steam Extraction Mainz - Wiesbaden (Germany) Concept: Multi Shaft 1+1 V94.3A Output (nat. gas, site) : 1 x 400 MW Efficiency (nat. gas, site): >58,4 %* COD: July 2001 Fuels: Natural Gas (Fuel oil Back up) Contract: EPC TK plus 10 y. S&M

  23. Pulau Seraya, Singapore: 2 CC 1S.V94.3AThe Most Efficient Plant in SEA Pulau Seraya (Singapore) Concept: Single Shaft 1S.V94.3A Output (nat. gas, site) : 2x 367 MW Efficiency (nat. gas, site): >57.2 % COD: November 2002 Fuels: Natural Gas (Fuel oil Back up) Contract: EPC TK plus 10 y. S&M

More Related