1 / 41

Chem. 230 10

Announcements. Have posted:Short problem answersLong problem answers (coming soon)Homework Long Problems Due Today Quiz 3 Next WednesdayAll GC topicsHPLC topics we get to today (through aerosol based detectors). Announcements. What we are covering today?HPLC Instrumentation (including the additional topic aerosol-based detectors).

Mia_John
Download Presentation

Chem. 230 10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Chem. 230 – 10/26 Lecture

    2. Announcements Have posted: Short problem answers Long problem answers (coming soon) Homework Long Problems Due Today Quiz 3 Next Wednesday All GC topics HPLC topics we get to today (through aerosol based detectors)

    3. Announcements What we are covering today? HPLC Instrumentation (including the additional topic aerosol-based detectors)

    4. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Mobile Phase Selection See slide 23 of 10/19/10 lecture for factors influencing selection of mobile phase Solvents must meet purity requirements (for column and detector functions) Solvent selectivity issue is important because: Changing solvent affects retention for different analytes differently HPLC is less efficient than GC so often more likely to have overlapping peaks Changes in pH also are important for acidic/basic compounds

    5. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Example of solvent changes to affect selectivity: RP-HPLC Separation of syringols from guaiacols Difference is in 2nd MeOH group Water/Acetonitrile eluents produce poor syringol/guaiacol separation factors Water/Methanol works better (although greater retention with MeOH of syringol is counter intuitive)

    6. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Optimization of Mobile Phase Composition Separation should be perfomed on three different water/organic systems Then additional separations can be carried out using 3 component mobile phases Patterns in retention can be used to optimize mobile phase composition

    7. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Mobile Phase Selection – pH Buffering In reversed-phase HPLC, solute generally must be non-ionized to be retained pH is adjusted by adding buffer in water/organic modifier pH at pKa means retention factor about half of non-ionized acid retention time In ion-exchange chromatography, pH should be in range needed to produce ions In ion-pairing RP-HPLC, an ion-pairing reagent is added

    8. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Solvent Flow HPLC requires high pressures and thus specific pumps The solvent also needs low levels of dissolved gases for pumps to function For the simplest “dedicated” HPLC, a single solvent reservoir and pump is needed For gradients and/or more method development work, switching between different solvents is needed

    9. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Pumps Most pumps use two piston heads 180ş out of phase to reduce pressure fluctuations Solvents go into and out of piston heads through one-way “check valves” Exit check valve closes on “in” stroke and entrance check valve closes on “out” stroke

    10. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Example of pump with non-functioning check valves Fluctuation in pressure and signal can occur Changes to retention time also will occur

    11. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Mobile Phase Delivery Solvent Flow (for gradient/greater flexibility operations) Dual Pumps (high pressure mixing) Low Pressure Mixing (stream “open” in proportion to fraction)

    12. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Injection Fixed Loop Injectors (see GC slides for diagram) Used in almost all cases For some injectors, partial filling of loop is possible (Vinj < Vloop), but then filling precision must be good Special injection valves needed for small injections (< 1 to 5 µL) Small injections needed for microbore columns Sample Matrix Best chromatography solvent weaker than mobile phase is used, particularly for larger volumes Remember, weaker solvent allows on-column concentrating

    13. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Columns Column dimensions Length: balance between flow, pressure and efficiency Diameter: Choice depends on separation purpose Preparative for isolation of larger quantities Microbore usually results in smaller mass detection limits but greater concentration detection limits Special care is needed using microbore with sample injection, pump stability, and extra-column broadening

    14. Liquid Chromatography Some More Questions Why is toluene normally a poor solvent choice in NP-HPLC? 2. A student is running a RP-HPLC separation using methanol and water. The selectivity (a value) is not good. He decides to switch to ethanol in water. Is this a good decision? A chemist is planning on purchasing an HPLC instrument for developing isocratic analysis methods. Is there an advantage to being able to select multiple solvents? In order to decrease H in a column, which column or packing material dimension should be changed? and in which direction? Why would one want to go to a microbore HPLC system? Why is the decrease in H observed often less than predicted when using smaller diameter packing material or small diameter columns?

    15. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Detectors Some Generalizations Relative to GC, HPLC detectors perform poorly and cost more Universal Type UV absorption (also considered selective) Refractive Index Aerosol-based detectors Conductivity (for ion chromatography) Selective Type Fluorescence Electrochemical Hyphenated Detectors Photodiode Array Detector (type of UV detector) Mass Spectrometer

    16. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors The most common type of detector Principle: absorption of ultraviolet (or visible) light Follows Beer’s Law: A = -log(I/Io) = ebC I = intensity of light (Io for blank) e = molar absorptivity (constant) b = path length C = concentration Best results for 0.001 < A < 1 Fast response – sensitivity trade off in path length (can select cell volumes)

    17. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors Sensitivity to Compounds (e values) Best for compounds with conjugated double bonds, aromatic groups or strongly absorbing functional groups (e.g. R-NO2, R-I, R-Br) Poor response for compounds with few or weakly absorbing functional groups (worst for R-CN, R-NH2, R-F; poor for R-OR’, R-OH, R-COOH, R-COOR’) Solvents: Requires use of solvents that absorb poorly in UV

    18. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors Wavelength Selection: Must choose ? > solvent cut-offs Most compounds absorb strongly at short wavelengths but also at longer wavelengths More sensitivity at shorter wavelengths (provided little mobile phase absorption) More selectivity at longer wavelengths

    19. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Detectors UV Absorption Detectors General Properties Reasonably good (but variable) sensitivity Good linearity, reproducibility Good stability (but baseline drift and warm up time) Poor as a universal detector Types: Fixed wavelength (absorption at single wavelength) Variable wavelength (can select one wavelength using monochromator) Photodiode array (can measure at multiple wavelengths simultaneously) – these give some qualitative information and allow more peak overlap

    20. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Detectors Application of UV Detection to Weak Absorbers Use short wavelengths (method must be selective; not always effective) Derivatize compounds to add strong absorber (common for amino acids, carbohydrates) Use indirect UV absorption (absorber added to eluent, analytes displace eluent and give negative peak)

    21. Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation – Detectors Refractive Index Detectors Principle: liquids with different refractive index will diffract light differently Composition will determine refractive index Any compound with a refractive index different than the solvent’s is detectable Advantage: Most universal detector (can detect weakly absorbing compounds) Disadvanges: Gradients are not possible Requires thermal stability Generally not very sensitive

    22. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Example Student Presentation

    23. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Outline Introduction to Technology Theory Including Three Types of Detectors Advantages and Disadvantages of ABDs Some Applications Conclusions References

    24. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Introduction Limitations of Conventional Detectors UV Absorption Detectors: Not very universal Poor sensitivity for many classes of compounds (carbohydrates, fats, amino acids, dicarboxylic acids, etc.) Refractive Index Detectors: Low and somewhat variable sensitivity Not gradient compatible Mass Spectrometer Detectors: Not all compounds ionize readily Expensive

    25. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Introduction Processes in Aerosol-Based Detectors: Effluent from column is nebulized producing spray of solvent and solute Spray droplets are heated in an oven, evaporating solvent gas and producing aerosol particles from solute Aerosol passes to an aerosol detector to produce a signal

    26. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Introduction Mobile Phase Requirements Solvent must be volatile (and cause little column bleed) Analyte Requirements Works best if analyte is non-volatile Semi-volatile compounds give reduced response

    27. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Theory Nebulization produces a distribution of drop sizes Solvent viscosity and surface tension can affect distribution of droplet sizes Evaporation shifts this to distribution of particle sizes based on: where: dd, dp are drop and particle diameters, C is mass concentration, and ?p is particle density

    28. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Theory Types of Aerosol-Based Detectors Depends on method of detecting aerosol particles Evaporative Light Scattering Detection (ELSD) (Charlesworth, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1978, 50, 1414) Condensation Nucleation Light Scattering Detection (CNLSD) (Allen, L. B.; Koropchak, J. A. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 841) Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD)/Aerosol Charge Detector (Dixon, R. W.; Peterson, D. S. Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 2930) 

    29. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Theory ELSD principles Detection by light-scattering by particles Efficient detection when dp ~ ?; less efficient at other sizes Non-linear response results At low concentrations, dp < ? so sensitivity is poor (detection limits of around 0.1 to 1 µg mL-1)

    30. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Theory Condesation Nucleation Light Scattering Detection Detection principle also uses particle light-scattering but overcomes poor detection of small particles by growing small particles to bigger particles by condensation of vapor on to particles This technology is very sensitive (a single 3 nm particle can be detected) This can translate to very low detection limits (~10 ppb or ~50 pg) under optimal conditions Commercialized recently

    31. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Theory Charged Aerosol Detection Particles charged as aerosol jet collides with ion-rich jet from corona discharge (commercial version) Charged particles are collected on a filter with charge passed to electrometer (current measured) In another version, particles are charged as they pass near a corona discharge region Sensitivity has equalled CNLSD (at least at standard HPLC flows) Large response range and linearity at lower concentrations

    32. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages: Better performing universal detectors than refractive index detectors Universal response for non-volatile analytes CNLSD and CAD sensitivity is similar to typical UV sensitivity Disadvantages: Requires analytes of low-volatility, volatile mobile phases CNLSD and CAD are often limited by solvent purity and column bleed Non-linear calibration often is needed Cost is higher than UV Detectors

    33. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Some Applications Food ELSD has been used extensively to characterize carbohydrates and lipids. Methodology requires no derivatizations and allows analysis of whole lipids (as opposed to just fatty acids) Polymers (with SEC) Useful for polymers without chromophores Pharmaceutical Industry ABDs are useful for assessing contaminants in pharmaceutical products Biotechnology and Environmental Samples Greater potential with CNLSD and CAD for analyzing low concentration samples (some carbohydrate examples) Analysis of Cations, Anions and Neutrals

    34. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Triglyceride Example By Lísa et al (J. Chromatogr. A, 1176 (2007) 135-142). Homogenous trigylcerides shown above without (left) and with “gradient compensation” (right) Gradient compensation allows response to remain proportional to area with a gradient Gradient compensation uses 2 additional pumps pumping eluent after the column to produce a constant eluent composition Plant oil samples shown below

    35. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Paclitaxel Example By Sun et al. (J. Chromatogr. A, 1177 (2008) 87-91). Looked at impurities in paclitaxel (a anti-cancer natural product from Pacific yew tree) using UV and CAD Shown in upper figure (standards – highest and stressed paclitaxel – lower) Paclitaxel impurity response shown to be uniform by CAD but not by UV detection Pharmaceutical impurity analysis used for determining acceptable pharmaceuticals If no standards available, CAD provides better estimation of impurity levels

    36. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Smoke Tracer Example My work (published in Dixon and Baltzell and Ward et al. – see my research webpage) Detected levoglucosan and related monosaccharide anhydrides These are thermal breakdown products from cellulose and hemicellulose It was possible to use the levoglucosan concentrations to estimate the total particulate matter (2.5) derived from woodsmoke

    37. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Glycan Profiling My current work (with Thomas Peavy, Biological Sciences) also preliminary work done by Ignaki et al. Glycans (glycoprotein oligosaccharides) are difficult to quantify Glycans are post-translational modifications and composition can depend on host organism/cells Profiles change in cancer cells Standards are unavailable or expensive Currently running surrogate standards to prepare multi-dimensional calibration (depending on mass concentration and retention time) Test standards show errors of ~0 to 25%

    38. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Conclusions ELSD has been replacing RID as a universal detector (at least for non-volatile compounds) ABDs can be used without exact standards for quantification (much as an FID is used in GC) Biggest limitations are volatility/non-volatility requirements, cost, and linearity

    39. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC References ELSD Text (p. 247-248) Charlesworth, J. M., Evaporative analyzer as a mass detector for liquid chromatography, Anal. Chem., 50, 1978, 1414-1420. Review: Koropchak et al., Fundamental Aspects of Aerosol-Based Light-Scattering Detectors for Separations, Adv. Chromatogr. 40, 2000, 275. CNLSD Allen, L. B. and J. A. Koropchak, Condensation nucleation light scattering: A new approach to development of high-sensitivity, universal detectors for separations, Anal. Chem., 65, 1993, 841-844. Same review listed for ELSD CAD Dixon, R. W. and D. S. Peterson, Development and testing of a detection method for liquid chromatography based on aerosol charging, Anal. Chem., 74, 2002, 2930-2937. Gamache, P.H., R.S. McCarthy, S.M. Freeto, D.J. Asa, M.J. Woodcock, K. Laws, and R.O. Cole, HPLC analysis of nonvolatile analytes using charged aerosol detection, LCGC North America, 23, 150, 152, 154, 156, 158, 160-161, 2005.

    40. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC References For Applications: (See my faculty web page for CAD references) Foods: Asa, D., Carbohydrate and oligosaccharide analysis with a universal HPLC detector, Am. Laboratory, 38, 16, 18, 2006. Moreau, R. A..  The analysis of lipids via HPLC with a charged aerosol detector, Lipids, 41, 727-734, 2006. Lísa, M., F. Lynen, M. Holcapek, and P. Sandra, Quantitation of triacylglycerols from plant oils using charged aerosol detection with gradient compensation Pharmaceuticals: Loughlin, J., H. Phan, M. Wan, S. Guo, K. May and B. Lin, Evaluation of charged aerosol detection (CAD) as a complementary technique for high-throughput LC-MS-UV-ELSD analysis of drug discovery screening libraries, Am. Laboratory, 39, 24-27, 2007. Sun, P., X. Wang, L. Alquier, C. A. Maryanoff, Determination of relative response factors of impurities in paclitaxel with high performance liquid chromatography equipped with ultraviolet and charged aerosol detectors, J. Chromatogr., A, 1177, 87-91, 2008. Biotechnology: Inagaki, S., J.Z. Min, and T. Toyo’oka, Direct detection method of oligosaccharides by high-performance liquid chromatography with charged aerosol detection, Biomed. Chromatgr., 21, 338-342, 2007. Atmospheric Aerosols: Dixon, R. W. and G. Baltzell, Determination of levoglucosan in atmospheric aerosols using high performance liquid chromatography with aerosol charge detection, J. Chromatogr. A, 1109, 214-221, 2006.

    41. Aerosol-Based Detectors for HPLC Questions For a complicated sample with several analytes present at moderate concentrations (around 50 µg mL-1), is it advantageous to use an ELSD (vs. a UV Detector) 1) if the compounds are weak absorbers, 2) if the compounds are strong absorbers? What instrument components will ELSD and CNLSD have in common that are not present in CAD? ABDs can not detect volatile analytes. How should weakly absorbing volatile compounds be determined? With a single calibration standard, is it possible to estimate concentrations of unknown compounds (e.g. for compounds without any standards)? and under what conditions? Protein concentration can be estimated by looking at absorption from aromatic amino acids? Why might using an ABD be a better way of quantifying unknown proteins?

    42. Liquid Chromatography More Detector Questions A compound has an absorptivity of 493 M-1 cm-1 at 210 nm and 32 M-1 cm-1 at 280 nm. Why would one even consider setting the wavelength to 280 nm? Describe one way to use a UV detector for detecting weakly absorbing organic compounds. Describe how you could use a photodiode array detector to determine if the odd shaped peak below is from one or multiple compounds.

More Related