1 / 7

HOSPITAL CAPACITY FOR AMBULANCE SYSTEM 11 April 2005 Dr. Catherine Nansamba Research Associate Injury Control Center - U

HOSPITAL CAPACITY FOR AMBULANCE SYSTEM 11 April 2005 Dr. Catherine Nansamba Research Associate Injury Control Center - Uganda. Inception Request to carry out the study ICC-U response Assessment of relevance of study to ICC-U Acceptance to take up study Development of study

Patman
Download Presentation

HOSPITAL CAPACITY FOR AMBULANCE SYSTEM 11 April 2005 Dr. Catherine Nansamba Research Associate Injury Control Center - U

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HOSPITAL CAPACITY FOR AMBULANCE SYSTEM 11 April 2005 Dr. Catherine Nansamba Research Associate Injury Control Center - Uganda

  2. Inception • Request to carry out the study • ICC-U response • Assessment of relevance of study to ICC-U • Acceptance to take up study • Development of study • Objective • Strategy • Work plan

  3. The Study • Target hospitals • Approach (Questionnaire) • Activities • Inputs (financial and non-financial) • Time frame • Results • Data • Analysis • Information

  4. Summary of the results • Eight health facilities were studied Public = 2 Private non-profit = 4 Private for-profit = 2 • Health facility size ranged from 8 to 1500 in-patient beds. • Number of emergency personnel ranged from 2 to 59 • 50% had dedicated resuscitation rooms.

  5. 50% had chest tubes and airway equipment. • Three (37.5%) had emergency units. • Seven (87.5%) had an ambulance in good condition. • 50% could offer ambulance services when called by telephone. • 50% had emergency personnel without specialized training.

  6. Deduction • Insufficient emergency services • No capacity to manage prevailing patient load • No capacity to handle increased patient load from an Ambulance Service Recommendations • The ambulance service plan therefore would only be effective in the event of health service capacity increases commensurate with the expected patient load.

  7. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE INJURY SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMME • Concept • Approach • Sentinel sites • Role players • Duration • Challenges • Recommendations

More Related