1 / 18

Purpose

Inter-industrial Structure in the Asia-Pacific Region: Growth and Integration, by using the 2000 Asian International Input-Output Table Bo Meng, Hajime Sato, Jun Nakamura, Hiroshi Kuwamori and Satoshi Inomata (IDE) 2006/05/30 ABCDE Tokyo. Purpose.

Patman
Download Presentation

Purpose

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inter-industrial Structure in the Asia-Pacific Region: Growth and Integration, by using the 2000 Asian International Input-Output TableBo Meng, Hajime Sato, Jun Nakamura, Hiroshi Kuwamori and Satoshi Inomata (IDE)2006/05/30 ABCDE Tokyo

  2. Purpose • to summarize the characteristics and patterns of change in industrial structures and trade structures of the countries in Asia-Pacific region from the three viewpoints of time, space, and industry, by using the AIO table for 1985, 1990, 1995, and 2000.

  3. Contents • Introduction of AIO Table • Industrial Structures and Growth Patterns of Asian Countries • Asian Countries’ Trade Structures and Patterns of Change • Backward Linkages and Final Demand Interdependence • Conclusion

  4. 1. Comparison between AIO Tables at 5 Different Time Points

  5. 2. Layout of the AIO Table 2000

  6. 3. Industrial Structures and Growth Patterns of Asian Countries3.1A Industrial Structure Defined by Gross Domestic Output

  7. 3.1B Typology of Industrial Structure (24-sector base)

  8. 3.2 Industrial Structure Defined by Specialization Coefficient 001 Paddy 002 Other agricultural products 003 Livestock and poultry 004 Forestry 005 Fishery 006 Crude petroleum and natural gas 007 Other mining 008 Food, beverage and tobacco 009 Textile, leather, and the products thereof 010 Timber and wooden products 011 Pulp, paper and printing 012 Chemical products 013 Petroleum and petro products 019 Other manufacturing products 014 Rubber products 015 Non-metallic mineral products 016 Metal products 017 Machinery 018 Transport equipment 019 Other manufacturing products 020 Electricity, gas, and water supply 021 Construction 022 Trade and transport 023 Services 024 Public administration

  9. 4. Asian Countries' Trade Structures and Patterns of Change 4.1A Changes in Regional Trade in East Asia

  10. 4. Asian Countries' Trade Structures and Patterns of Change 4.1B Changes in Regional Trade in East Asia

  11. 4. Asian Countries' Trade Structures and Patterns of Change 4.2 Structural Changes in Interindustry Trade

  12. 5. Backward/Forward Linkages of Asian Countries

  13. 5.1 Backward Linkages of Asian Countries

  14. 5. Key findings about Backward Linkage effects In summary, the presence of Japan and the United States remains huge in the Asia-Pacific region under review. the comparison with the 1995 table indicates that, first, the interdependence in the region is intensifying. second, the importance of China and Korea, and particularly of China, appear to be rising in Asia-Pacific region.

  15. 6. Final Demand Interdependence of Asian Countries

  16. 6. Key findings about Final Demand Interdependence • On an all-industry basis, Asian countries tend to increase their dependence on overseas markets, with Indonesia, Thailand, and Taiwan standing out in this respect. • Japan and the United States still maintain overwhelming presence among Asian countries. • (4) China's influence is rapidly expanding in all countries under review, with its influence particularly pronounced in heavy industry. • (5) Interdependence within the ASEAN region is relatively small, except between Malaysia and Singapore. But Thailand and Malaysia are deepening their interdependence.

  17. Concluding Remarks • Maturing of NIES, catch-up by ASEAN, rise of China →Asian financial crisis(1997)→ASEAN and Korea were affected, Mainland China felt little impact→Chinese economy has boosted it presence in Asian region. • Industrial structure: share of service sector is increasingly expanding in JP, USA, and NIES. ASEAN are shifting the focus to secondary industry, China, as an old industrial nation has risen as a new industrial nation (joined the group of ASEAN). • Trade structure: a structure revolving around JP and USA→Three-pillared structure led by JP, USA, and China. China depends heavily on JP and USA and is only recently expanding trade with Korea and Taiwan. China’s presence in ASEAN region is not yet as large as that of JP and USA. • FTAs and EPSs→Diversification of regional trade→intensified interdependence among countries in Asia. In terms of the backward linkage effects, China has the largest power of dispersion. • Export market: Asian countries have achieved economic growth by increasing their dependence on JP and USA’s market. China’s growth has enabled it to offer an export market for Asian countries. The intra-ASEAN market appears to have little growing.

  18. Thank you very much for your kind attention

More Related