1 / 31

Improving Data and Measures for Decision-Making about College Costs The Delta Cost Project Jane Wellman and Colleen Len

Improving Data and Measures for Decision-Making about College Costs The Delta Cost Project Jane Wellman and Colleen Lenihan NCES/AIR National Summer Data Policy Institute June 24, 2010. Topics to cover . Context for the work; focus and audience

Renfred
Download Presentation

Improving Data and Measures for Decision-Making about College Costs The Delta Cost Project Jane Wellman and Colleen Len

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improving Data and Measures for Decision-Making about College Costs The Delta Cost Project Jane Wellman and Colleen Lenihan NCES/AIR National Summer Data Policy Institute June 24, 2010

  2. Topics to cover • Context for the work; focus and audience • Methodological challenges to measures of college costs • Developing a longitudinal data base • Focus on six metrics • Web-based data on TCS-online • State-level metrics

  3. Estimating the gap -Nationwide

  4. Methodological issues w/measuring college costs • Data Sources: consistency and reliability; granularity • Issues that need to be resolved in developing cost metrics for comparative/longitudinal analysis • Institutional typology • Separating inputs from outputs • Unit of analysis: Student (FTE/Headcount); Faculty/staff, other (research outputs) • Assigning costs to functions • Separating instruction and research

  5. Methodological issues… continued • Distributing shared costs for academic and institutional support, operations and maintenance • Treatment of scholarships, tuition ‘discounts’ and unfunded aid • Isolating costs of instruction by level of instruction (LD, UD, Graduate, Professional) • Isolating costs by discipline • Adjusting for inflation • Accounting for capital costs • Treatment of revenues from endowments and investments.

  6. Methodology determined by audience and data limitations • For aggregate data on national trends, IPEDS data provides consistent and reliable source – but still needs work • Following Bowen, NCHEMS, Jenny, and others – standard cost-per student methodology • Operating expenses only

  7. Developing the database: data sources • IPEDS, Academic years 1987 – 2008 • Completions • Employees by Assigned Position • Enrollments • Faculty Salaries • Fall Staff • Finance • Institutional Characteristics • Student Financial Aid • FISAP 1998-2008

  8. Developing the database: organizing the data • Reconciling revenue and expenditures across the various reporting standards • Carnegie classifications – Carnegie 2000 v. Carnegie 2005 • Consistency in grouped/ungrouped data • Inflation adjustor CPI-U • All reported on per FTE student basis

  9. Developing the panels • For any N-year set (5, 10, 20, and Trends) an institution needed to report the following elements in each year: • Instruction expenditures (instruction01) • Enrollment (fte_count) • Completions awarded (total_completions) • Imputations for missing data • Outliers removed • U.S. only • Resulting panel size/different years

  10. Composition of the panel • Public research universities- 152 institutions • Public master’s– 231 institutions • Public community colleges – 785 institutions • Private nonprofit research –100 institutions • Private nonprofit master’s – 317 institutions • Private nonprofit bachelor’s –471 institutions Collectively more than 90 percent of all two and four year public and private non-profit institutions

  11. Primary focus on six metrics(all cost adjusted using CPI-U/FTE in 2008 $) 1. Where the money comes from: revenues per student by major source 2. Where the money goes • E&R, E&G, total operating • Within E&R 3. Relation between tuition and spending increases 4. Cost/price/subsidy 5. Cost per degree 6. Costs v. enrollments

  12. Why these metrics? • Can be developed with existing data • Can be aggregated to national, state, or institutional level • Organized to be relevant to policy-decisions made by legislatures, governing boards • Revenues • Tuition • Subsidy • Production

  13. 1. Where the money comes from Source: Delta Cost Project IPEDS database, 1987-2008, 11-year matched set. Note: In private institutions, investment returns include unrealized gains/losses.

  14. 2. Where the money goesHow much goes to core academic/educational programs? Education and related expenses (E&R) • Instruction, student services, and educational share of academic & institutional support and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Education and general expenses (E&G) • E&R plus sponsored research, public service, and net scholarships/fellowships Total operating expenses • All of the above plus auxiliary enterprises, independent operations, hospitals, and “other”

  15. *Note: In 1998, public institutions reported gross scholarships and fellowships. Source: Delta Cost Project IPEDS Database, 1987-2008, 11-year matched set.

  16. 2b. Average education and related (E&R) spending per FTE student, by component, at public institutions, 1998-2008 (in 2008 $).

  17. 2c. Average education and related (E&R) spending per FTE student, by component, at private nonprofit institutions, 1998-2008 (in 2008 $).

  18. 3:Relationship between tuition and spending increases

  19. 4. Cost/Price/Subsidy What proportion of E&R costs are paid by students, and what by the institution/state? • Cost: Average E&R spending per student • Price: Proportion of cost paid from net tuition revenues • Subsidy: Proportion of cost paid from institutional revenues (Cost less price)

  20. Source: Delta Cost Project IPEDS database, 1987-2008, 11-year matched set.

  21. 5: Spending per Degree and Completion, AY1998-2008 (in 2008 $) Source: Delta Cost Project IPEDS Database, 1987-2008, 11-year matched set.

  22. 5a. Definitions: Degrees/Completions • Standard IPEDS category for many years • “Degrees” = all degrees, all levels and disciplines • “Completions” = all degrees plus any other ‘completion’ – diploma, certificate, etc. Most relevant for community colleges. Degrees and Completions per 100 FTE students: • Different than “cohort” – aggregate measure of all degree/completion output per enrolled student • Captures CC transfers and other students who do not start as full-time freshmen

  23. 5b: Total degrees and completions per 100 FTE students, AY1998-2008 Source: Delta Cost Project IPEDS Database, 1987-2008, 11-year matched set.

  24. Delta Cost Project TCS Online Trends in College Spending (TCS) Online is a free, user-friendly, online data system www.tcs-online.org TCS Online provides standardized reports for: • Focus and comparison institutions • Individual institution snapshots • U.S. Carnegie Group averages Using DCP finance and performance metrics: • User-defined year selections and inflation adjustors • Dollar amounts per FTE student • Group means/medians • Percent change • Also includes enrollment data (by status, level, and race/ethnicity) Various output options: • Single or multi-year • Tables and graphs (single year only) • Html, excel, and pdf

  25. State Fact Sheets For public institutions only, state level data showing key DCP metrics from 2003-2008: • where the students are • cost/price/subsidy • student share of costs • instruction share of costs • completions per 100 FTE students • spending per completion • comparisons to national averages • Created to provide precise data at the institution and Carnegie classification level by untangling “parent-child” reported data, which is only possible in more recent years.

  26. For more information, visit the Delta Project website, at: http://www.deltacostproject.org http://www.tcs-online.org

More Related