1 / 34

Understanding and Messaging to At Risk Drivers - At Risk Driver Segmentation September 2008

Strategic Communications Forum “Communicating in an Era of Change”. Understanding and Messaging to At Risk Drivers - At Risk Driver Segmentation September 2008. Prepared for:. Special Thanks to:. Background and Methodology. Background and Objectives.

Download Presentation

Understanding and Messaging to At Risk Drivers - At Risk Driver Segmentation September 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strategic Communications Forum “Communicating in an Era of Change” Understanding and Messaging to At Risk Drivers - At Risk Driver Segmentation September 2008 Prepared for: Special Thanks to:

  2. Background and Methodology

  3. Background and Objectives To reduce drunk driving, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) wanted to “message” more effectively to “Drivers At Risk” • “Drivers at Risk” were defined as drivers who are: • 18 to 44 • Drive 10+ times per week • Drink alcohol 2+ days per week; • In the past month, have drunk 3+ drinks (female) or 4+ drinks (male) on at least one occasion • Captured information about: • Self-reported behaviors • Perceptions • Attitudes • Perceived risks in drinking and driving • Lifestyle/leisure interests • Demographics

  4. Research Methodology • 20 minute Web survey • 834 respondents • First two weeks of May, 2007 • “Soft quotas” by age-group • 18-20: 7% • 21-24: 41% • 25-34: 38% • 35-44: 14%

  5. Summary of Overall Findings

  6. Share of “Bad” DUI’s Share of At-Risk Drivers • If they could be identified and “reached” … • The greatest opportunity to reduce at-risk driving is by focusing on “Drivers Most At Risk” • 18% of At-Risk Drivers do 82% of “serious driving under the influence” (driving within 1 hour of having 3 or more drinks) • Such drivers are for the most part more attitudinally resistant to changing their behaviors

  7. The Three R’s: Reasons Rationales, and perceived Risks POPOV: Perceptions, Opinions, and Points Of View The Two I’s: Impacts, and Influences of others Summary of Findings (Continued) • The greatest opportunity to reduce at-risk driving is focusing on “Drivers Most At Risk.” • The most effective communication “levers” for reducing at-risk driving are to be found in the perceptions – and misperceptions – of At Risk Drivers

  8. Summary of Findings (Continued) • The greatest opportunity to reduce at-risk driving is focusing on “Drivers Most At Risk.” • The most effective “levers” to reduce at-risk driving are rooted in “The 3 R’s, the 2 I’s, … and the ‘POPOV’”. • The most effective way to message is to “attack on multiple fronts” … • Rational AND emotional appeals • Attack and undermine dysfunctional attitudes, but … • Recognize denial mechanisms • Move incrementally • Target the environment (at the bar/restaurant level)

  9. Summary of Findings (Continued) • The greatest opportunity to reduce at-risk driving is focusing on “Drivers Most At Risk.” • The most effective “levers” to reduce at-risk driving are rooted in “The 3 R’s, the 2 I’s, … and the ‘POPOV’”. • The most effective way to message is to “attack on multiple fronts.” • Many At-Risk Drivers have a drinking problem … • Makes modifying behavior more difficult • Must be appealed to indirectly – so they don’t just “turn off the message”

  10. With Limited Resources …How Can We Effectively– and Efficiently –Target Efforts to Reduce DUI??? • Which At-Risk Drivers should we focus on? • Which messages should we use? • Different messages for different At-Risk Drivers? • Other “levers” of public policy?

  11. Elements of a Segmentation • A guy walks into a bar…

  12. A “Divide and Conquer” Strategy: Segmentation • IDENTIFY AND PROFILE “clusters” who require: • Different messages • Different approaches • SELECT AND PRIORITIZE most important groups by: • Levels of risk • Ability to influence behavior • STRATEGIZE on how to reach these groups (based on situations, attitudes, perceptions, beliefs, preferred media etc.) • TARGET RESOURCES to achieve best “bang for the buck:” • Advertising & PR • Law enforcement • Public policy

  13. Introducing: The Five At-Risk Driver Segments

  14. They are most … • Likely to think it is OK to drink and drive “as long as no one gets hurt” • They are more … • Likely to have been arrested for DUI • Likely to believe that they will get off lightly Introducing … Middle-Class Risk Takers “I live my life and don’t worry too much about the consequences ” • They are least … • Fearful of DUI penalties • Likely to take precautions to avoid driving after drinking • Interested in being in being designated driver

  15. Middle-Class Risk Takers: Profile Indexes of 100 = Average for all At-Risk Drivers • Demographics: • Lower-middle socio-economics • Less likely to be white • More likely to have kids 20% Of At Risk Drivers 18% Of DUI Incidents

  16. Middle Class Risk Takers: Implications • Segment is of “medium importance” (medium risk) • Segment has a “bad attitude” – so they will be harder to influence • Segment is unusually likely to have been arrested – but the experience “wasn’t so bad” • To keep individuals from entering this segment, raise the pain of penalties • Increase the visibility of enforcement • A sub-group has particularly high levels of DUI – get them off the road!

  17. Middle Class Risk Takers: Messaging Strategies • Although they “care less” about risks and penalties, messaging should “push the button” of their greatest fears: • Killing someone • Going to jail • Losing their license • Getting arrested • Getting fined.

  18. Introducing … Socially Accountable Drinkers • They are most … • Likely to fear that someone will get hurt/killed • Likely to fear legal/financial/ social consequences • Interested in “being a good person” “I’m likely to take precautions so I don’t put myself and others at risk by drinking and driving.” • They are more: • Willing to be a designated driver • Likely to plan ahead for drinking occasions • Likely to drink for taste, or to complement a meal

  19. Socially Accountable Drinkers: Profile • Demographics: • Older • More likely to be married • Above-average income • More likely than the average to: • Agree that drunk drivers are a problem • Think others look down on drunk drivers • Think drunk drivers are likely to be punished 22% Of At Risk Drivers 11% Of DUI Incidents

  20. Socially Accountable Drinkers: Implications • Segment is a long-term, slow-but-steady risk of DUI • They have passed the age where they are “merely experimenting” – and are likely to keep occasionally drinking and driving • They moderate their drinking and driving -- so they “fly under the radar” • Good news: They are not as drunk when they drive • Bad news: They are less likely to get taken off the road

  21. Socially Accountable Drinkers: Messaging Strategies • Segment has: • High focus on the risks to themselves/concern for others • High concern for opinions/judgments of others • Strong desire to fulfill a positive self image • A strong interest in “responsible behaviors” • Ads should therefore feature: • Consequences to others (those hurt in an accident, their own families) • Consequences to themselves (social shame, getting arrested, going to jail, losing job, losing license, etc.) • Reinforcement of responsible behaviors and how good it feels to “do the right thing” • A warning: “Remember -- it only has to happen once”

  22. Introducing … Inexperienced Social Drinkers • They are … • Most likely to be 21 to 24 • Most likely to be interested in “getting drunk” • Often drink with groups of friends – who strongly influence them • Somewhat less willing to be a designated driver • But most likely to use one “Let’s Party!” • More likely to “stick around ‘til they they sober up” • Most likely to drink due to under “positive” circumstances or with positive emotions

  23. Inexperienced Social Drinkers: Profile • Demographics: • Young & single • Going to school – and renting • Average 5.3 drinks per occasion • More likely to ride with someone DUIing • More likely to say: • “It’s not easy to find a way home after drinking unless you drive yourself” • “It’s impossible to have good time when you are a designated driver” 19% Of At Risk Drivers 26% Of DUI Incidents

  24. Inexperienced Social Drinkers: Implications • Assuming they survive, some will “grow up” -- but others will “graduate” into long-term problem DUIs • The goals should be: • Keep them alive and help them avoid the riskiest behaviors • Get the most dangerous ones off the road • Divert them from “progressing” into other Segments • They are more likely than other drivers at risk to use a designated driver and/or to spend the night: • Encourage this behavior

  25. Inexperienced Social Drinkers: Messaging Strategies • “Make the party stop” – show the consequencesof DUI: • Getting arrested/jail • Loss of license • Increased insurance rates • Someone getting killed. • “The party is more fun when precautions are taken”(planning ahead, designated drivers, spending the night, etc.) • Make it socially acceptable to seek – and offer – help/ intervention: feature role models who make it “cool” to plan ahead, and who make it “stupid” to take bad risks for no purpose • Get bartenders to help: states/localities should seek (and enforce) help from bartenders in keeping young drinkers off the road • Interventions for binge drinking

  26. Introducing … Responsible Drinkers • They are least likely to … • Drink excessively • Have DUI’d in the last 12 months • Fear killing/hurting someone while DUIing • The are most likely to … • Be older and/or married • Drink to complement a meal, at restaurants, and at family gatherings “I’m unlikely to drive after having too much to drink” • They also believe that … • Their drinking is under control • They are not likely to cause an accident while drinking/driving • Drunk driving laws should be enforced

  27. Responsible Drinkers: Profile • Demographics: 25-44, at least a college degree, married with kids, high socio-economics • Less likely than average to say: • “The penalties for drunk driving are too harsh” • “It is not a big deal to lose your license if you get caught Drinking and Driving” • “It’s impossible to have good time when you are a designated driver” • “I sometimes don’t realize when I’ve had too much to drink” 21% Of At Risk Drivers 8% Of DUI Incidents

  28. Responsible Drinkers: Implications • Segment is a much lower threat to DUI • Don’t “target” segment, but primarily count on “spillover effect” of messaging to other segments • Caveat:Survey results are based on “self-reported behavior:” Are these drinkers really as well controlled as they maintain?

  29. Responsible Drinkers: Messaging Strategies • As with Socially Accountable drinkers, a good message is: • “It only has to happen once” • Use segment’s belief in enforcement to remind them of their obligations • Use their interest in “being a good person” to remind them how good it feels to “do the right thing” • A “wake-up call” from “cognitive dissonance:” • Show an individual who talks about how bad drunk drivers are, -- then show the same individual justifying driving because “he’s only had a few ….”

  30. Introducing … Discontented Blue Collars • They are the most: • Likely to drink to get drunk – espe-cially when they are feeling bad! • At risk – • For drinking heavily • For driving under the influence • For getting arrested “Let me drown my sorrows” • They are more likely: • To believe that they can “get away with it” • To admit that “I don’t always know when I’ve had too much” • … but they also: • Worry about the consequences of DUI • Are more willing to take precautions – so they can give themselves permission to “really get plowed.”

  31. Discontented Blue Collars: Profile 18% Of At Risk Drivers Demographics:Less education, less employed, bit younger, unmarried Average 6.1 drinks per occasion– and 44% have been arrested for DUI More likely than average to say 37% Of DUI Incidents • “It’s impossible to have a good time and be a designated driver” • “The penalties for drunk driving are too harsh”

  32. Discontented Blue Collars: Implications • Segment most at risk: • Heavy drinking • High DUIs • False perceptions about ability to drink and drive • Dangerous attitudes and beliefs • Heavy drinking is driven by negative emotion/depression. • Reaching and influencing this segment is a real challenge. • Important to enforce DUI laws: get them off the road! • Provide and mandate treatment for both alcoholism and for likely depression • Place some of the accountability on the drinking establishment.

  33. Discontented Blue Collars: Messaging Strategies • Because they especially fear them, focus on consequences: • Arrest • Loss of license • Fines • Increased insurance rates • They are more willing to consider strategies to avoid driving when they drink • Stress: “If you’re going to tie one on, plan ahead – and get some help.” • Make it socially acceptable to seek – and offer – help/intervention

  34. Thank you

More Related