1 / 22

CASLA through a social constructivist perspective: WebQuest in project-driven language learning

CASLA through a social constructivist perspective: WebQuest in project-driven language learning. Vassiliki Simina and Marie-Josée Hamel CCL, UMIST, UK vsimina@hotmail.com mjhamel@ccl.umist.ac.uk. Presentation plan. Background and aim Overview on constructivism General definition

abra-porter
Download Presentation

CASLA through a social constructivist perspective: WebQuest in project-driven language learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CASLA through a social constructivist perspective: WebQuest in project-driven language learning Vassiliki Simina and Marie-Josée Hamel CCL, UMIST, UK vsimina@hotmail.com mjhamel@ccl.umist.ac.uk

  2. Presentation plan • Background and aim • Overview on constructivism • General definition • Focus on social constructivism • Principles and implications CASLA • Conditions for successful: • Learning • SLA • Conditions juxtaposed • Characteristics of the ideal: • Socio-constructivist environment • CALL environment • Characteristics juxtaposed • WebQuest • As one example of good practice • Definition and characteristics • Examples • Conclusions

  3. Background and aim • MSc in CALL dissertation • Mandate: investigate the contribution of constructivism in CALL • Aim of the research: • Suggest a model (expansion) which will allow for the description of the characteristics of an ideal social constructivist CALL environment promoting conditions for successful SLA • Find potential existing examples of good/best practice • Results of initial investigation are presented today • Further research remains to be done • Constructive feedback is welcome!

  4. Overview on constructivism • Historical account • Socrates: • Maieutic • Vico/Kant: • Knowledge precedes reasoning • Piaget: • Cognitive stages of development • Vygotsky • Socio-cultural cognitive development • Bruner • Discovery learning • Dewey • Experiential learning

  5. Overview on constructivism • General definition: • A theory of learning • Central tenet: • learners construct their knowledge on their own: • by associating new with prior information • through experience and reflection upon experience • A procedural/cognitive model • Theory concerned with how knowledge is constructed • Focus on the learner and his mental/cognitive operations while learning • Learner’s participation in the process/control over the process

  6. Overview on constructivism • Focus on social constructivism (Vygotsky 1978) • Key concepts: • Social interaction • Thinking subject and realm of the social are interconnected • Socio-cultural cognition • Context as essential for construction of knowledge • Language as a common mean to mediate knowledge • Zone of Proximal Development • Scaffolding • Collaboration to achieve self-reliance

  7. Principles and implications for CASLA • Knowledge is constructed by the individual based on his own experience • Learning is an active process where the learner’s mental constructs are enlarged/modified to fit his experiential world • The focus is on the learner’s interpretation of the real world • Implication  • Approaches like problem-solving and discovery allow the learner to explore the real world and make sense of it on his own

  8. Principles and implications for CASLA • Social interaction supports the construction of knowledge • Scaffolding process is core • Language is fundamental in social interaction • Implication  • Approaches promoting collaboration and autonomy allow the learner to actively participate in socially situated contexts

  9. Socio-constructivist conditions for successful learning • Vygotsky (1978) • Learners should be provided learning data within their zone of proximal development • hence directing them to become more self-reliant • Driscoll (1994) • Provide complex and relevant learning environments that incorporate authentic activity • Provide for social negotiation • Allow access to multiple perspectives and multiple modes of learning • Encourage student ownership in learning • Emphasize self-awareness of knowledge construction

  10. Conditions for successful SLA • Chapelle (1998 and 2001): • Ideal (comprehensible) input/output • Interaction (Gass 1997) • Cognitive (Skehan 1998) • Provide a range of target structures, etc. • Socio-affective (MacIntyre et al. 1998) • WTC

  11. Conditions juxtaposed • Common grounds • variety of materials/multiple representations • interaction in collaborative learning • self-monitoring • Expansion • allowance for learner’s constructions • consideration of individual differences in cognitive characteristics of learners • promotion of social interaction for negotiation/multiple representations of meaning • Provision of comprehensible input in authentic environment facilitating associations with prior knowledge • emphasis on scaffolding process and autonomy rather than directed focus on form and meaning

  12. Characteristics of the ideal socio-constructivist environment • A socio-constructivist environment that facilitates knowledge construction (Jonassen 1994) by: • Providing multiple representation of reality • Representing the natural complexity of the real world • Focusing on knowledge construction, not reproduction • Presenting authentic tasks • Providing real-world, case-based learning environments, rather than pre-determined instructional sequences • Fostering reflective practice • Enabling context and content dependent knowledge construction • Supporting collaborative construction of knowledge through social negotiation

  13. Characteristics of the ideal socio-constructivist environment • An environment that fosters: • Cognitive apprenticeships • Modelling, scaffolding, coaching, exploration, articulation and reflection (Conway 1997) • Situated learning or cognition • Task-based, project-based and content-based learning (Warschauer and Healey 1998) • Collaborative learning • Learners work together towards a common goal

  14. Characteristics of the ideal CALL environment • A CALL environment that provides (Chapelle 1998): • Plenty of ideal input/output • Opportunity for focus on form and meaning • Opportunity for noticing errors • Modified interaction between learner and computer

  15. Characteristics of an ideal socio-constructivist CALL environment • Learner-centred • learner free to make his/her own interpretations • teacher as a facilitator • Authentic • context-rich, experience-based activities • Social interaction • sharing of multiple representations, reflection and monitoring • opportunity for negotiation (social/meaning) • Scaffolding • manipulation of attention (focus on meaning/form) • collaboration to achieve aims

  16. WebQuest • An example of good practice • An information gap resolution model (Felix 2002) • A model where social interaction is fostered by collaborating and co-operating in meaningful exchanges through authentic information gaps • A model that seeks to achieve maximum connectivity and student engagement • It involves contextualised language and research tasks • It stimulates creative simulations

  17. WebQuest • Definition • “an inquiry-oriented activity in which some or all the information that learners interact with comes from the Internet” (Dodge 1995) • Description • six essential components: • introduction, task, process, resources, evaluation and conclusion

  18. WebQuest • Characteristics • content in context • project-based • convergent (problem-solving) task • motivational elements • group/solo activities • single discipline or interdisciplinary • adaptable • multimodal • authentic assessment • integration of Internet in curriculum

  19. WebQuest • Main sites: • http://www.webquest.org/ • http://www.webquestuk.org.uk/ • Some examples: • Discover London WebQuest • Guess Who’s Coming For Dinner • The Job Of Your Dreams WebQuest • This Mission Is Possible • A Visitor’s Guide To The Solar System • many more

  20. Conclusions • Future work • need for a more solid and robust constructivist theory of language learning • Model in progress… • empirical research • Investigations/evaluations

  21. References CHAPELLE, C. (1998). “Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA”. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1): 22-34. CONWAY, J. (1997). “Educational technology's effect on models of instruction”, electronic version available at <http://copland.udel.edu/~jconway/EDST666.htm>. DRISCOLL, M. P. (1994).Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. DODGE, B. (1995). “Some thoughts about WebQuests”, electronic version available at <http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec596/about_webquests.html>. GASS, S. (1997).Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  22. References FELIX, U. (2002) “The web for constructivism approaches in language learning”. ReCALL, 14 (1): 2-15. JONASSEN, D. H.(1994). “Thinking technology”. Educational Technology, 34 (4): 34-37. MACINTYRE, P. D. et al. (1998). “Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation”. The Modern Language Journal, 82: 545-62. SKEHAN, P. (1998).A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. VYGOTSKY, L. S. 1978.Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. WARSCHAUER, M. AND HEALEY, D. (1998). “Computers and language learning: An overview”. Language Teaching, 31: 57-71.

More Related