Parallel Sort, Search, Graph Algorithms

1. Parallel Sort, Search, Graph Algorithms Sathish Vadhiyar

2. Radix Sort • During every step, the algorithm puts every key in a bucket corresponding to the value of some subset of the key’s bits • A k-bit radix sort looks at k bits every iteration • Easy to parallelize – assign some subset of buckets to each processor • Load balance – assign variable number of buckets to each processor

3. Radix Sort – Load Balancing • Each processor counts how many of its keys will go to each bucket • Sum up these histograms with reductions • Once a processor receives this combined histogram, it can adaptively assign buckets

4. Radix Sort - Analysis • Requires multiple iterations of costly all-to-all • Cache efficiency is low – any given key can move to any bucket irrespective of the destination of the previously indexed key • Affects communication as well

5. Histogram Sort • Another splitter-based method • Histogram also determines a set of p-1 splitters • It achieves this task by taking an iterative approach rather than one big sample • A processor broadcasts k (> p-1) initial splitter guesses called a probe • The initial guesses are spaced evenly over data range

6. Histogram SortSteps • Each processor sorts local data • Creates a histogram based on local data and splitter guesses • Reduction sums up histograms • A processor analyzes which splitter guesses were satisfactory (in terms of load) • If unsatisfactory splitters, the , processor broadcasts a new probe, go to step 2; else proceed to next steps

7. Histogram SortSteps • Each processor sends local data to appropriate processors – all-to-all exchange • Each processor merges the data chunk it receives Merits: • Only moves the actual data once • Deals with uneven distributions

8. Probe Determination • Should be efficient – done on one processor • The processor keeps track of bounds for all splitters • Ideal location of a splitter i is (i+1)n/p • When a histogram arrives, the splitter guesses are scanned

9. Graph Traversal • Graph search plays an important role in analyzing large data sets • Relationship between data objects represented in the form of graphs • Breadth first search used in finding shortest path or sets of paths

10. All-Pairs Shortest Paths • To find shortest paths between all pairs of vertices • Dijikstra’s algorithm for single-source shortest path can be used for all vertices • Two approaches

11. All-Pairs Shortest Paths • Source-partitioned formulation: Partition the vertices across processors • Works well if p<=n; No communication • Can at best use only n processors • Time complexity? • Source-parallel formulation: Parallelize SSSP for a vertex across a subset of processors • Do for all vertices with different subsets of processors • Hierarchical formulation • Exploits more parallelism • Time complexity?

12. Parallel BFSLevel-synchronized algorithm • Proceeds level-by-level starting with the source vertex • Level of a vertex – its graph distance from the source • Also, called frontier-based algorithm • The parallel processes process a level, synchronize at the end of the level, before moving to the next level – Bulk Synchronous Parallelism (BSP) model • How to decompose the graph (vertices, edges and adjacency matrix) among processors?

13. Distributed BFS with 1D Partitioning • Each vertex and edges emanating from it are owned by one processor • 1-D partitioning of the adjacency matrix • Edges emanating from vertex v is its edge list = list of vertex indices in row v of adjacency matrix A

14. 1-D Partitioning • At each level, each processor owns a set F – set of frontier vertices owned by the processor • Edge lists of vertices in F are merged to form a set of neighboring vertices, N • Some vertices of N owned by the same processor, while others owned by other processors • Messages are sent to those processors to add these vertices to their frontier set for the next level

15. Lvs(v) – level of v, i.e, graph distance from source vs

16. BFS on GPUs

17. BFS on GPUs • One GPU thread for a vertex • In each iteration, each vertex looks at its entry in the frontier array • If true, it forms the neighbors and frontiers • Severe load imbalance among the treads • Scope for improvement

18. Depth First Search (DFS)

19. Parallel Depth First Search • Easy to parallelize • Left subtree can be searched in parallel with the right subtree • Statically assign a node to a processor – the whole subtree rooted at that node can be searched independently. • Can lead to load imbalance; Load imbalance increases with the number of processors (more later)

20. Maintaining Search Space • Each processor searches the space depth-first • Unexplored states saved as stack; each processor maintains its own local stack • Initially, the entire search space assigned to one processor • The stack is then divided and distributed to processors

21. Termination Detection • As processors search independently, how will they know when to terminate the program? • Dijikstra’s Token Termination Detection Algorithm • Based on passing of a token in a logical ring; P0 initiates a token when idle; A processor holds a token until it has completed its work, and then passes to the next processor; when P0 receives again, then all processors have completed • However, a processor may get more work after becoming idle due to dynamic load balancing (more later)

22. Tree Based Termination Detection • Uses weights • Initially processor 0 has weight 1 • When a processor transfers work to another processor, the weights are halved in both the processors • When a processor finishes, weights are returned • Termination is when processor 0 gets back 1 • Goes with the DFS algorithm; No separate communication steps • Figure 11.10

23. Graph Partitioning

24. Graph Partitioning • For many parallel graph algorithms, the graph has to be partitioned into multiple partitions and each processor takes care of a partition • Criteria: • The partitions must be balanced (uniform computations) • The edge cuts between partitions must be minimal (minimizing communications) • Some methods • BFS: Find BFS and descend down the tree until the cumulative number of nodes = desired partition size • Mostly: Multi-level partitioning based on coarsening and refinement (a bit advanced) • Another popular method: Kernighan-Lin

28. Parallel partitioning • Can use divide and conquer strategy • A master node creates two partitions • Keeps one for itself and gives the other partition to another processor • Further partitioning by the two processors and so on…

29. Multi-level partitioning

30. K-way multilevel partitioning algorithm • Has 3 phases: coarsening, partitioning, refinement (uncoarsening) • Coarsening - a sequence of smaller graphs constructed out of an input graph by collapsing vertices together

31. K-way multilevel partitioning algorithm • When enough vertices are collapsed together so that the coarsest graph is sufficiently small, a k-way partition is found • Finally, the partition of the coarsest graph is projected back to the original graph by refining it at each uncoarsening level using a k-way partitioning refinement algorithm

32. K-way partitioning refinement • A simple randomized algorithm that moves vertices among the partitions to minimize edge-cut and improve balance • For a vertex v, let neighborhood N(v) be the union of the partitions to which the vertices adjacent to v belong • In a k-way refinement algorithm, vertices are visited randomly

33. K-way partitioning refinement • A vertex v is moved to one of the neighboring partitions N(v) if any of the following vertex migration criteria is satisfied • The edge-cut is reduced while maintaining the balance • The balance improves while maintaining the edge-cut • This process is repeated until no further reduction in edge-cut is obtained

34. Graph Coloring

35. Graph Coloring Problem • Given G(A) = (V, E) • σ: V {1,2,…,s} is s-coloring of G if σ(i) ≠σ(j) for every (i, j) edge in E • Minimum possible value of s is chromatic number of G • Graph coloring problem is to color nodes with chromatic number of colors • NP-complete problem

36. Parallel graph Coloring – General algorithm

37. Parallel Graph Coloring – Finding Maximal Independent Sets – Luby (1986) I = null V’ = V G’ = G While G’ ≠ empty Choose an independent set I’ in G’ I = I U I’; X = I’ U N(I’) (N(I’) – adjacent vertices to I’) V’ = V’ \ X; G’ = G(V’) end For choosing independent set I’: (Monte Carlo Heuristic) • For each vertex, v in V’ determine a distinct random number p(v) • v in I iff p(v) > p(w) for every w in adj(v) Color each MIS a different color Disadvantage: • Each new choice of random numbers requires a global synchronization of the processors.

38. Parallel Graph Coloring – Gebremedhin and Manne (2003) Pseudo-Coloring

39. Sources/References • Paper: A Scalable Distributed Parallel Breadth-First Search Algorithm on BlueGene/L. Yoo et al. SC 2005. • Paper:Accelerating large graph algorithms on the GPU usingCUDA. Harish and Narayanan. HiPC 2007. • M. Luby. A simple parallel algorithm for the maximal independent set problem. SIAM Journal on Computing. 15(4)1036-1054 (1986) • A.H. Gebremedhin, F. Manne, Scalable parallel graph coloring algorithms, Concurrency: Practice and Experience 12 (2000) 1131-1146.