1 / 13

Waste, GHGs and Local Government: From Green Paper to White Paper Tim Moore PhD Managing Director

Waste, GHGs and Local Government: From Green Paper to White Paper Tim Moore PhD Managing Director Balance Carbon Pty Ltd. Overview. Green Paper Responses Possible outcomes Impact on LG and waste. NGER Act: Reporting. National Greenhouse & Energy Reporting Act 2007.

adila
Download Presentation

Waste, GHGs and Local Government: From Green Paper to White Paper Tim Moore PhD Managing Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Waste, GHGs and Local Government: From Green Paper to White Paper Tim Moore PhD Managing Director Balance Carbon Pty Ltd

  2. Overview • Green Paper • Responses • Possible outcomes • Impact on LG and waste

  3. NGER Act: Reporting National Greenhouse & Energy Reporting Act 2007

  4. Green Paper: CPRS • Govt “caps” emissions • Allocates permits to that level • Distribution to industry (grandfathering, auction) • TEEII, strongly affected industry • 1permit per tCO2e • End of year acquittal: emissions vs. permits • Markets chose whether to buy permits or reduce emissions • cost effective action differs between businesses

  5. NGER Act/Green Paper • All sectors other than agriculture covered • Green Paper suggests changes to NGER • Reporting threshold to 10KtCO2e for waste • Councils included along with individuals (will have to invoke international agreement to override constitutional issues)

  6. WMAA National Carbon Committee • Supports broad concept of CPRS; consideration of: • the appropriate emissions threshold • Exclusions of waste pre-dating scheme start • Post closure costs; • measurement • Accept 25ktCO2e threshold, not 10ktCO2e • Exclude historical waste • Create accurate, cost effective measurement process • Exclude waste until measurement problems clarified

  7. National Carbon Committee • The Government should give consideration to complementary measures which will encourage emissions reductions in the parts of the waste industry which are not directly caught by the CPRS. • Recycling, offsets, compost…

  8. LGA SA • Broad agreement with approaches outlined in WMAA submission • IF the Govt sees that it must include different thresholds for urban vs. rural, then 10ktCO2e and 25ktCO2e for rural • Consideration of offsets or other complementary measures

  9. SA Goverment • Broad agreement with approaches outlined in WMAA and LGA SA submissions

  10. SO, most submissions… • Disagreed that waste could be equitably measured at landfill • That lack of complementary measures in the sector would disadvantage other operators (recycling) • That a “split” threshold was inequitable and would have unwanted outcomes • That historical liabilities and closed sites are hard to deal with • That the waste sector should be excluded

  11. Implications • If waste is out: • no “stick” to get organics out of landfill • a carrot (“carbon credits”) would exist • will likely eventually be brought into CPRS, and will be facing high costs (equal to global carbon price) • If waste is in: • Cost of dumping organics will be different to other material • Cost will be charged up front (how?) • Some LGs will be captured by NGERS and CPRS

  12. Ideally… • Waste is out (at least for first phase and join if agriculture joins) • Organic waste is diverted from landfill, or treated differently at the landfill • Carbon credit price goes high enough fast enough to fund emissions avoidance (capture, flaring, power, composting…) • When waste joins CPRS, no sites triggering threshold.

  13. Measure, Manage, Mitigate www.balancecarbon.com tim@balancecarbon.com

More Related