1 / 9

Forum on Action Item #1 in advance of

Forum on Action Item #1 in advance of. the 4/28/11 General Faculty Meeting. Context for Action Item #1- Amendment to II.2 and II.3 (NTT/DPC issue). Ongoing 5 year discussion about voting, DPCs, craft models, etc.

admon
Download Presentation

Forum on Action Item #1 in advance of

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Forum on Action Item #1in advance of the 4/28/11 General Faculty Meeting

  2. Context for Action Item #1- Amendment to II.2 and II.3 (NTT/DPC issue) • Ongoing 5 year discussion about voting, DPCs, craft models, etc. • Dissatisfaction with “all or nothing” approach to voting privileges; this unlinks Non-Tenure Track (NTT) voting privileges from DPC privileges • Problem of excessive use of the “adjunct” prefix just to prevent NTT eligibility for DPCs and NTT voting • ASU is not in line with Promotion & Tenure practices at peer institutions and all other tenure-granting UNC schools

  3. Nationwide best practices are to provide voting privileges appropriate to rank--but what are ASU’s ranks? • Lecturer: contract faculty, reappointed contingent upon departmental need; duty is only teaching; terminal degree not required. About 130 without “adjunct” at ASU, most 3/4 or full time. At ASU, most do not possess terminal degree. • Instructor: use of term should be rare; this is a temporary rank, used for TT hire with terminal degree in progress; faculty will move up to Assistant Professor when degree is completed. (Has been misapplied here, historically; but has been more appropriately applied in past two years). Currently 12 without “adjunct.” • Assistant, Associate and Full Professor: Tenure track line, duties are teaching, research and service, terminal degree (or equivalent) required. About 785 at ASU.

  4. Section 2 changes nothing--just moves the underlined phrase up to improve clarity. The real change is in Section 3---to delete “Lecturer.” For implications, see next slide.

  5. YES FT Professors, Assoc. Professors, Assistant Professors & Instructors will be eligible to serve on DPCs FT Professors, Assoc. Professors, Assistant Professors & Instructors will be eligible to elect the membership of DPCs Don’t want FT Lecturers on DPCs? No need to do anything. Thus, the prefix “adjunct” need not be applied to limit DPC service, and thus FT Lecturers will have voting and committee privileges There is no change to the voting status of any faculty other than full-time Lecturers. NO FT Professors, Assoc. Professors, Assistant Professors, Instructors & Lecturers will be eligible to serve on DPCs FT Professors, Assoc. Professors, Assistant Professors, Instructors, and Lecturers will be eligible to elect the membership of DPCs Don’t want FT Lecturers on DPCs? Lecturers must get “adjunct” prefix, which removes all voting and committee privileges There is no change to the voting status of any faculty What does my vote mean?

  6. Contextual facts: In the UNC system, who is eligible to be on committees that make Promotion & Tenure decisions? Tenure-track only TT and NTT High Schools-No tenure Eastern Carolina Appalachian School of Science and Math Elizabeth City School of the Arts Fayetteville NC Central NC State NC-AT&T UNC-Asheville UNC-Chapel Hill UNC-Charlotte UNC-Greensboro UNC-Pembroke UNC-Wilmington Western Carolina* Winston Salem State Data gathered by survey, phone calls and reading Faculty Handbooks. Committees vary: some craft models, some include all TT ranks, some elected, some appointed, about half only do Promotion & Tenure, about half do NTT appointment and other hires as well. At most places NTT voting privileges on non-P&T items vary by department and at many place are reserved only for Full-time NTTs. *Only WCU permits Full Time NTTs to elect DPC membership.

  7. Contextual facts: At our peer institutions, who is eligible to be on committees that make Promotion & Tenure decisions? Tenure-track only TT and NTT Bowling Green Appalachian Cal State-Chico Cal State-Fresno College of Charleston Eastern Illinois George Mason Georgia Southern James Madison Miami University Ohio Northern Iowa Sam Houston State Stephen F. Austin Towson U Wisconsin-La Crosse West Chester Pennsylvania Western Illinois Western Washington Data gathered by survey, phone calls and reading Faculty Handbooks. Committees vary: some craft models, some include all TT ranks, some elected, some appointed, about half only do Promotion &Tenure, about half do NTT appointment and other hires as well. At most places NTT voting privileges on non-P&T items vary by department and at many place are reserved only for Full Time NTTs.

  8. #1 Question at forum: Q: If the vote passes and Full-time Lecturers are no longer eligible to serve on DPCs, how can NTTs be assured DPCs will reappoint NTTs fairly? A: (1) Strong departmental policy documents with clear reappointment criteria should make NTTs more confident in DPC decision making; (2) Those departments that wish to do so can create “search committees” to handle NTT reappointment--these committees could report either to DPC or directly to chair, as per the Faculty Handbook.

  9. Summary-Why Senate recommended that faculty consider this amendment to the Constitution: • Culmination of 5 year discussion • Adopts best practices nationwide of voting privileges appropriate to rank: • Better for NTTs: protects most vulnerable category of faculty from contentious P&T decision making and high DPC workload; but encourages voting outside of DPCs • Better for TTs: Having only TTs on DPCs is in line with P&T practices fitting with ASU’s mission as stated in the strategic plan, ASU’s growing reputation/brand, and reputable credentialing • Revises “all or nothing” approach to voting by unlinking NTT voting privileges from DPC eligibility • Reduces motivation to use the “adjunct” prefix just to prevent Lecturer eligibility for DPCs

More Related