1 / 19

Projective Relations on the Sphere

Projective Relations on the Sphere. Eliseo Clementini University of L’Aquila eliseo@ing.univaq.it. 2 nd International Workshop on Semantic and Conceptual Issues in GIS (SeCoGIS 2008) – 20 October 2008, Barcelona. Presentation summary. Introduction The geometry of the sphere

adonia
Download Presentation

Projective Relations on the Sphere

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Projective Relations on the Sphere Eliseo Clementini University of L’Aquila eliseo@ing.univaq.it 2nd International Workshop on Semantic and Conceptual Issues in GIS (SeCoGIS 2008) – 20 October 2008, Barcelona

  2. Presentation summary • Introduction • The geometry of the sphere • The 5-intersection on the plane • Projective relations among points on the sphere • Projective relations among regions on the sphere • Expressing cardinal directions • Conclusions & Future Work

  3. Introduction • A flat Earth: • mostspatial data models are 2D • models for spatial relations are 2D • Do these models work for the sphere? • Intuitive facts on the Earth surface cannot be represented: • A is East of B, but it could also be A is West of B (Columbus teaches!) • any place is South of the North Pole (where do we go from the North Pole?)

  4. Introduction • state of the art • qualitative spatial relations • 2D or 3D topological relations • 2D or 3D projective relations • topological relations on the sphere (Egenhofer 2005) • proposal • projective relations on the sphere • JEPD set of 42 relations

  5. The geometry of the sphere • The Earth surface is topologically equivalent to the sphere • Straight lines equivalent to the great circles • For 2 points a unique great circle, but if the 2 points are antipodal there are infinite many great circles through them.

  6. The geometry of the sphere • Two distinct great circles divide the sphere into 4 regions: each region has two sides and is called a lune. • What’s the inside of a region?

  7. The geometry of the sphere • The convex hull of a region A is the intersection of all the hemispheres that contain A • The convex hull of a region can be defined if the region is entirely contained inside a hemisphere. • A convex region is always contained inside a hemisphere.

  8. The 5-intersection on the plane Leftside(B,C) • It is a model for projective relations • It is based on the collinearity invariant • It describes ternary relations among a primary object A and two reference objects B and C Before(B,C) C B Between(B,C) After(B,C) Rightside(B,C)

  9. The 5-intersection on the plane Outside(B,C) • Special case of intersecting convex hulls of B and C • 2-intersection C B Inside(B,C)

  10. The 5-intersection on the plane P1 P1 • case of points • P1 can be between, leftside, before, rightside, after points P2 and P3 • P1 can be inside or outside points P2 and P3 if they are coincident P3 P1 P2 P1 P1

  11. Projective relations for points on the sphere • case of points • P1 can be between, leftside, rightside, nonbetween points P2 and P3 • Special cases: • P2, P3 coincident • Relations inside, outside • P2, P3 antipodal • Relations in_antipodal, out_antipodal

  12. Projective relations for regions on the sphere • Plain case: • External tangents exist if B and C are in the same hemisphere • Internal tangents exist if convex hulls of B and C are disjoint • Relations between, rightside, before, leftside, after

  13. Projective relations for regions on the sphere • Special cases: • reference regions B, C contained in the same hemisphere, but with intersecting convex hulls (there are no internal tangents) • Relations inside and outside

  14. Projective relations for regions on the sphere • Special cases: • reference regions B, C are not contained in the same hemisphere, but they lie in two opposite lunes (there are no external tangents but still the internal tangents subdivides the sphere in 4 lunes) • It is not possible to define a between region and a shortest direction between B and C • relations B_side, C_side, BC_opposite

  15. Projective relations for regions on the sphere • Special cases: • If B and C’s convex hulls are not disjoint and B and C do not lie on the same hemisphere, there are no internal tangents and the convex hull of their union coincides with the sphere. • Relation entwined

  16. Projective relations for regions on the sphere • The JEPD set of projective relations for three regions on the sphere is given by all possible combinations of the following basic sets: • between, rightside, before, leftside, after (31 combined relations); • inside, outside (3 combined relations); • B_side, C_side, BC_opposite (7 combined relations); • entwined (1 relation). • In summary, in the passage from the plane to the sphere, we identify 8 new basic relations. The set of JEPD relations is made up of 42 relations.

  17. Expressing cardinal directions • Set of relations (North, East, South, West) applied between a reference region R2 and a primary region R1. • Possiblemapping: • North = Between(R2, North Pole). • South = Before(R2, North Pole) • East = Rightside (R2, North Pole) • West = Leftside (R2, North Pole) • undetermined dir= After(R2, North Pole) • Alternative mapping: • North = Between(R2, North Pole) – CH(R2) • …

  18. Conclusions • Extension of a 2D model for projective relations to the sphere • For points, no before/after distinction • For regions, again 5 intersections plus 8 new specific relations • Mapping projective relations to cardinal directions Further work • Spatial reasoning on the sphere • Refinement of the basic geometric categorization in four directions, taking also into account user and context-dependent aspects that influence the way people reason with cardinal directions • Integration of qualitative projective relations in web tools, such as Google Earth

  19. Thank You Any Questions? Thanks for your Attention!!! Eliseo Clementini eliseo@ing.univaq.it

More Related