1 / 35

CONSTRUCTIVISM

CONSTRUCTIVISM. Jessia Delia in Em Griffen, ch. 8, 4th ed. CLICKER QUESTION. The RCQ is used to determine a person’s categories for understanding people; TRUE = A FALSE = B. CLICKER QUESTION.

adora
Download Presentation

CONSTRUCTIVISM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CONSTRUCTIVISM Jessia Delia in Em Griffen, ch. 8, 4th ed.

  2. CLICKER QUESTION The RCQ is used to determine a person’s categories for understanding people; TRUE = A FALSE = B

  3. CLICKER QUESTION A core assumption of constructivism is that persons make sense of the world through systems of personal constructs; TRUE = A FALSE = B

  4. CLICKER QUESTION People who use rhetorical design logic, have the ability to redefine the situation in a way that defuses conflict; TRUE = A FALSE = B

  5. CLICKER QUESTION Griffin writes: “When guys get together they typically talk about others in terms of external behaviors--thesports they play, the cars they drive, the battles they fight. Conversely, girls tend to talk about people--their perceptions of internal motives, attitudes, traits, and personalities” (p. 197, 6th ed.). You Agree = A You Disagree = B

  6. Constructivism is a theory about effective communication;

  7. An Implicit Theory • We all have an implicit theory of communication; • Your implicit theory helps you to interpret (make sense of) and shape your social world; • We are not usually aware of our interpretive scheme (implicit theory);

  8. Role Category Questionnaire • To make explicit our interpretive scheme, the RCQ is used to determine a person’s categories for understanding people; • The RCQ is a simple paper and pencil test that asks the subject to select a person they like and one they dislike and devoting 5 minutes to each, write a list of terms that describe the person’s attributes, personality, habits, beliefs, and the way they treat others, characteristics that make them who they are;

  9. Honest Peaceful Caring Intelligent Pleasant Good humor Engenders warmth Supportive Shares power Dishonest Intimidating Jealous Destructive Engenders fear Malicious Cruel Abuses power LIKED DISLIKED

  10. The Core Assumption of Constructivism • Persons make sense of the world through systems of personal constructs; • Constructs are concepts located in our minds; • The RCQ is concerned not with physical features, but rather categories of personality and action;

  11. Cognitive Complexity • Researchers use the RCQ to determine the respondent’s degree of cognitive complexity as they form interpersonal impressions;

  12. Three Components of Cognitive Complexity • Answers given on the RCQ can be scored on three different dimensions of cognitive complexity: • Differentiation • Abstraction • Integration

  13. DIFFERENTIATION • Differentiation is the number of separate personality constructs used to describe the target person;

  14. ABSTRACTION • Abstraction is the degree to which the respondent sees visible behavior in terms of internal traits, motives, and dispositions;

  15. INTEGRATION • Integration has to do with recognizing and reconciling conflicting impressions;

  16. SIMPLIFIED SCORING • In short, the RCQ is scored by counting up the number of different constructs (concepts) used to describe the 2 target persons; • Griffin reports seeing a range of scores from 3 to 45, but reports the adult norm as 20 - 25;

  17. Validity of the Scores • Delia argues from data collected (research) that the RCQ does measure cognitive complexity; • He argues that cognitive complexity increases with age in children; • He argues that individual differences in adults remain stable over time (test-retest); • RCQ scores are independent of IQ, empathy, writing skill, and extroversion;

  18. THE MAIN HYPOTHESIS OF CONSTRUCTIVISM • People who are cognitively complex in their perceptions of others have a communication advantage over those with less-developed mental structures; • These individuals have the ability to produce sophisticated messages that have the best chance to achieve their communication goals;

  19. PERSON-CENTERED MESSAGES • In one study (by Ruth Ann clark and Jesse Delia), children of second grade to ninth grade took the RCQ test orally; • The children then were asked to role-play convincing a woman they didn’t know to keep a lost puppy;

  20. RESULTS • Some children showed no realization that the woman’s perspective may differ from their own; • Other kids recognized the difference but failed to adapt their messages; • A more sophisticated group were able to imagine what the woman was thinking and tried to refute counterarguments they expected from her; • Sophisticated messages also pointed out the advantages to her that would come from complying with the request;

  21. RESULTS • Clark and Delia found that the quality of messages improved as the age of the children increased; • Cognitively complex children--at a given age--were 2 years ahead of their classmates in ability to encode person-centered messages; • The children most able to take the perspective of the other were the older children with the most cognitive complexity;

  22. Rhetorically Sensitive Self-Monitoring Taking the Role of the Other Identification Audience Awareness Listener Adaptation SOME TERMS USED TO DESCRIBE THE CAPACITY TO CREATE PERSON-CENTERED MESSAGES

  23. PERSON-CENTERED MESSAGES • Constructivists claim that cognitively complex people are better able to produce person-centered messages than less cognitively complex people; • However, Griffin points out the cognitively complex people, while able, do not always produce person-centered messages (fatigue, pressure to conform or other situational factors may intervene);

  24. PERSON-CENTERED MESSAGES • Sophisticated messages reflect more than the speaker’s efforts at audience adaptation; • Sophisticated messages also reflect an attempt to accomplish multiple goals;

  25. MESSAGE DESIGN LOGIC • People hold one of 3 distinct notions about how communication works: • Each is called a message design logic • Each is an implicit theory of the ways in which messages can be shaped to serve as means to ends;

  26. MESSAGE DESIGN LOGICS • Expressive design logic: • People who operate on this logic, maintain that language is a medium for expressing thoughts and feelings; • They say what they think and feel; • Their goal is to be open and honest; • They do not believe in much interpretation; • They are direct;

  27. MESSAGE DESIGN LOGICS • Conventional design logic: • These people assume that communication is a game played cooperatively, according to socially conventional rules; • For this person, effective communication = appropriateness; • When asked why they said what they said now, their answer is the words were the appropriate thing to say under the circumstances;

  28. MESSAGE DESIGN LOGICS • Rhetorical design logic: • These people operate on the premise that communication is the creation and negotiation of social selves and situations; • Persons in conversation co-construct their own social realities; • Nothing is fixed;

  29. Rhetorical Design Logic • These people can use expressive logic design when they believe it will achieve their goals; • These people can use conventional design and adapt to custom; • They have the additional ability to redefine the situation in a way that defuses conflict; • They are proactive in seeking consensus, while down playing the raw use of power;

  30. RESEARCH FINDING ON MESSAGE DESIGN LOGIC • O’KEEFE found that average RCQ scores were lowest (20) for those who used an expressive design logic, a bit higher (21) for those who employed a conventional design logic, and highest (25) for those who used the rhetorical design logic; • O’Keefe found that 80% of the rhetorically sensitive messages were written by women;

  31. EFFECTS OF RHETORICAL DESIGN LOGIC ON COMMUNICATION • Rhetorical design logic results in communication outcomes that are more • persuasive; • comforting; • More sophisticated comforting messages result in users being better liked; • Users report feeling better about themselves and those they try to help;

  32. EFFECTS OF RHETORICAL DESIGN LOGIC ON COMMUNICATION • Relationship maintenance effects do not simply show that sophisticated communication skills result in sustaining friendships; • “Similar skills model”: Friendships tended to last when partners possessed matching verbal skills--high or low; • Sophisticated communication skills are an advantage only when a friend has the sophistication to appreciate them;

  33. EFFECTS OF RHETORICAL DESIGN LOGIC ON COMMUNICATION • Organizational Effectiveness: Results of a longitudinal study (Sypher and Zorn, 1986) on workers at an insurance company showed that more cognitively complex workers acquired better-paying jobs and were moving up through the ranks of the company faster than their less complex colleagues;

  34. LEARNING TO BE A SOPHISTICATED SPEAKER • Some research suggests that becoming a sophisticated speaker is learned; • Through nurture and discipline, children learn from their parents to be more sophisticated speakers;

  35. CRITIQUE • A major criticism of the theory is its reliance upon the simplistic RCQ measure; • Are efforts being undertaken to help children develop the self-reflective experiences to develop sophisticated communication?

More Related