1 / 21

NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM POM 06 BRIEF

NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM POM 06 BRIEF. Ed Chergoski NAVSEA 04L52 04 November 2003. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM. NAVSEA 04L52 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. NAVSEA Budget Specialist Gail Miller. NSWC Seal Beach Engineering and Technical Specifications Procurement Training Liaison Program Office Support.

ailis
Download Presentation

NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM POM 06 BRIEF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAMPOM 06 BRIEF Ed Chergoski NAVSEA 04L52 04 November 2003

  2. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM NAVSEA 04L52 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT NAVSEA Budget Specialist Gail Miller NSWC Seal Beach Engineering and Technical Specifications Procurement Training Liaison Program Office Support NSWC Corona Calibration Standards Allowancing and Procurement ICP Development NSWC Earle SPETERL to COSAL conversion Allowancing &Configuration Mgt

  3. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Team Construct IHD Det Earle IHD Det Seal Beach NSWC Corona John Lupi (90%) Steve Makieil (100%) Len Rice (9%) Joe Teti (100%) Kathy Saunders (80%) Kathy Ingenhousz (94%) Rich Devenero (100%) Mark McHugh (100%) Ernie Davison (100%) Steve Mosczynski (100%) Donna Morse (100%) Greg Hogan (100%) Iksang Ro (5%) Program Support Dennis Kelly (100%)

  4. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM

  5. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM

  6. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Priority Functional Group Annual Maintenance Average Cost per Unit 1 Signal Generator $5,382,838.49 $5,289.17 2 DMM $4,301,951.42 $503.92 3 Baseband Generator $3,722,906.30 $1,032.23 4 Synchro Indicator $3,520,850.94 $1,337.19 5 Spectrum Analyzer $2,197,164.55 $2,802.43 6 Calibrator $2,111,725.80 $4,925.84 7 Logic Analyzer $1,952,713.16 $3,023.59 8 Oscilloscopes $1,801,961.62 $962.43 9 Voltmeter $1,498,560.14 $1,293.58 10 Frequency $1,229,301.89 $918.69 11 LAN/WAN $1,178,429.61 $3,778.66 This denotes the total annual costs by functional group including calibration and repair, and then, for those that are bolded, reprioritized based on Fleet requests that the TMDE program resolve issues with problematic or obsolete groups of equipment

  7. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Mechanics of analysis • POM construct was based on individual GPETE model reliability and maintenance cost, ‘Cost of Ownership’. • MOCC data from 1998 through mid-2003 was used to derive 3 values for each individual model number: • Repair (Failure Rate): likelihood that a model would fail calibration or be submitted for repair (expressed as percentile) • Calibration: average hours expended to calibrate a given model • Beyond Economical Repair (BER): model submitted for calibration fails (is rejected), is submitted for repair, and shows no completed repair, subsequent calibration, or recall date (expressed as count). Cost is projected as outright procurement cost for standard model in the SCAT. • Based on these 3 values, the annualized costs of maintaining the Navy inventory, as reported by TEMIS, was calculated.

  8. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Assumptions and influencing factors • MOCC data integrity, while improving, varies greatly between reporting years. • MOCC data reflects multiple entries for individual GPETE items • 197,866 GPETE line items reported by MOCC • 95,882 GPETE line items reported by TEMIS (derived from SCLSIS) • Hinging Fleet expenditures on model vice SCAT will identify the ‘bad actors’ in Navy inventory • Ignoring platform application will provide the best averaged sample of actual equipment performance/reliability • Inadequate reporting of repair part expenditures justifies excluding repair part costs from repair calculations.

  9. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Mathematics • Calibration Costs • Repair Costs • BER Costs

  10. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM 5 Year Procurement Plan Three key requirement areas: • Outfitting • Based on Deploying Battle Groups • Obsolete Equipment • Standardization • In addition to engineering considerations we consider the following when performing standardization: • Models with short calibration intervals • Models with low inventory quantities • SCAT Code Consolidation - RM&A

  11. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM

  12. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM This curve (shown below) indicates that the average maintenance costs for most test equipment begins to rise sharply at an economic age of 14.7 years. Within most GPETE functional groups, this is the point at which purchase of new equipment to replace obsolete inventory becomes fiscally imperative. Based on historical control numbers however, the current GPETE inventory of over 127,000 line items worth roughly $340M can only be completely replaced every 42.5 years.

  13. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAMFUNDING PROFILE CONTROLS: SPONSOR FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 N76 OPN 327 2,442 3,268 2,970 2,800 2,851 2,905 2,956 N77 OPN 1,109 1,085 1,305 1,338 1,302 1,330 1,351 1,376 N78 OPN 1,791 1,752 4,268 2,086 2,075 2,112 2,152 2,191 N096 OPN 443 480 573 536 553 563 574 585 N091 OPN 151 147 174 167 171 175 178 182 N43 OPN 1,594 1,552 1,650 1,693 1,740 1,772 1,806 1,840 N43 O&M,N 419 436 458 456 463 477 492 504 N6 OPN 817 795 991 930 1,241 1,266 1,286 1,311 SCN *524 *730 * * * * * * • SCN ANNUAL FUNDING AMOUNT AND SOURCE DETERMINED BY SPECIFIC PLATFORMS IN THE SCN OUTFITTING PHASE NOTE: THE ABOVE FUNDING PAYS FOR GPETE AND CALIBRATION STANDARDS EQUIPMENT AND PROGRAM LABOR COSTS

  14. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Projected Budget Requests • FY($M) 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Tot • Emergent Technology 0.7 0.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 4.8 • Standard/Modern 5.0 5.0 12.8 12.8 12.9 12.9 12.8 64.7 • Maintenance Initiatives 0.4 0.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 9.4 • Budget Totals for all Initiatives 16.4 16.4 16.4 14.8 14.6 79.1

  15. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Projected Cost Avoidance by test equipment family

  16. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Standardization Initiative To implement Fleet wide GPETE modernization by using standardization within families of test equipment that perform similar basic functions. Procurements over time has resulted in a variety of models that perform similar functions. This has created a huge footprint for logistics support. We have broken down our approximate 900 individual equipment types into functional groups. This provides opportunity to consolidate models as well as defined SCAT codes relative to maintenance. The analysis has been completed for the first two groups, oscilloscopes and digital multimeters.

  17. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM StandardizationConstruct • Process Organization • 77 Measurement Discipline (functional) Groups • Lifecycle Management Plan for Each Group • Long Term Budget Plan • Technical Evaluation • FY02/03 - Scopes & Meters • Scopes - (12 SCATs to 3, 71 Models to 6) • DMMs - (38 SCATs to 15, 241 Models to 35) • FY04 - work planned • Function and Signal Generators, Frequency Counters, & Megohmmeters

  18. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Class Standard Allowancing Initiative This effort incorporates a methodology by which test equipment requirements across particular ship class or like operational shore activities are optimized to incorporate cost-of-ownership concepts by overall inventory standardization. This process provides an efficient and effective means for inventory control, equipment modernization and configuration management

  19. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAMclass allowancing sample – partial MCM construct

  20. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM Calibration Standards Modernization • To define and standardize the NAVSEA process for determining laboratory standards allowances and the associated procurement policy • Establishes the roles and responsibilities assigned by NAVSEA to support TMDE calibration functions. • Re-initiates Laboratory Allowance Reviews • Performs Production workload analysis • Identifies candidates for modernization

  21. NAVSEA TMDE PROGRAM • Major/Management Issues • Lack of OM & N Funding adversely impacts on available labor to perform engineering functions • Lack of OPN Funding adversely impacts on program’s ability to match execution to Fleet requirements

More Related