1 / 32

Media’s impact on public opinion & policy: implications for journalists by: Guy Berger, Rhodes Journalism & M

Media’s impact on public opinion & policy: implications for journalists by: Guy Berger, Rhodes Journalism & Media Studies. “. Public opinion sets the bounds of the possible – especially as regards the shape of policy and the exercise of power.

aislin
Download Presentation

Media’s impact on public opinion & policy: implications for journalists by: Guy Berger, Rhodes Journalism & M

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Media’s impact on public opinion & policy:implications for journalists by: Guy Berger,Rhodes Journalism & Media Studies

  2. Public opinion sets the bounds of the possible – especially as regards the shape of policy and the exercise of power. Qtn: how do orthodoxies change – cf. women’s role, privatisation and liberalisation? Qtn: where does media fit in? That’s why understanding media’s impact is important. ”

  3. Contents: • THE ACTORS AND DYNAMICS • 5 models of action in media-policy • Other issues in media-policy • HOW MEDIA INFLUENCE WORKS • 3 theories of media impact • CONCLUSION

  4. THE ACTORS: • the public public opinion • the media • policy people

  5. Specific players: • media: different platforms, premier outlets, media stars (Oprah) • public: general public, civil society groups incl NGOs, business, global forces, individuals. • policy people: the makers and the implementers. • Qtn: who drives the process?

  6. Five models of how the relationship works: • Liberal democratic • Muckraker model • Bypassing civil society • Manipulation model • Propaganda picture

  7. 1. Liberal democratic model MEDIA COVERAGE 2 3 PUBLIC + OPINION 1 GOVT RESPONDS i.e. The public is the active source of public opinion eg. Aids activists win coverage, affect govt

  8. 2. Muckraker model PUBLIC + OPINION 2 MEDIA COVERAGE 1 GOVT RESPONDS 3 i.e. Media coverage is active source of public opinion eg. Exposure of child abuse

  9. 3. Bypassing Civil Society 2 GOVT RESPONDS MEDIA COVERAGE 1 = “PUBLIC OPINION” i.e. Media impacts on govt, irrespectv of real public opinion eg. Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky

  10. 4. Manipulation model 2 MEDIA COVERAGE GOVT INITIATES 1 PUBLIC + OPINION 3 i.e. Government is the originator of public opinion eg. Iraq war in US, Info scandal, discredit leader’s rivals

  11. 5. Propaganda picture MEDIA COVERAGE 2 GOVT INITIATES 1 i.e. Government is the originator, circuit incomplete eg. media coverage pleases govt, ignores public

  12. Summing up (a): • Policy people infer Public Opinion from media, • and they use media to promote their policies. • Often it is interaction of media & politicians (not the public) that affects govt policy & practice.

  13. Summing up (b): • But civil society also has a real role to play as in the first model. • In practice, many situations combine aspects of all five models. • Media is assumed to be a factor in all five

  14. Other issues 1: • Enthusiastic, one-sided & simplistic treatment in the media = rapid policy change; • Eg. anti-retrovirals • Complexity & debate = slower policy action. • Eg. genetically modified crops • Effect on politicians & policy is a transition: mobilisation -> action -> maintenance -> fade (as the media intensity declines).

  15. Other issues 2: • Some media more influential than others: eg. TV greater on dramatic & short-term events. • But often TV takes its cue from print. • Intermedia agenda-setting power. For example, some titles set “the story” for others. • Note: power of international media and cultural imperialism.

  16. HOW MEDIA INFLUENCE WORKS

  17. The making of “public opinion” • What is public “opinion”? • Theory 1: indirect effects • Theory 2: direct effects • Theory 3: deeper effects

  18. Defining Public Opinion ·Knowledge and information ·Beliefs (about reality) ·Values (about goodness) ·Norms (about behaviour)   => attitudes, which in turn => contextualise and colour specific opinions on specific issues. • Public Opinion = a set of shared attitudes based on: knowledge, beliefs, values, norms. • i.e heart-and-head on an aggregated scale

  19. Influence: Theory 1 • Very Indirect effects (“Tertiary-level effects”): • Media creates new publics, causes changes in politics, alters people’s time allocation. • A “media dense” environment will have greater effect in this area, even on identities • Much less the case in most of Africa.

  20. Influence: Theory 2a 2. Most Direct effects (“Primary effects”): Works on short-term attitudes and opinions A. Stimulus-response (S-R) theory: Overly-powerful view. But true that S-R exists in affective responses: fear, tears, identification, anger, laughter, arousal. Suicides, fashions, riots. Less-powerful view: S-R is modified by psycho variables, socio variables, 2 step diffusion.

  21. Influence: Theory 2b 2. Most Direct effects (“Primary effects”) cntd: B.Uses & gratificationstheory: Audiences act on media; they make the effects. But: • People do change through media exposure, • Messages are not open-ended, • There are unobvious effects (= consumerism), • Reinforcement, rather than change, effect. Still: U&G valid ‘cos audiences not purely passive

  22. Influence: Theory 3 3. Direct, but deeper, effects or influence (“Secondary effects”):  Works on beliefs, values, norms, worldviews (foundation of attitudes & opinions) More longterm, & relatively powerful: • Agenda-setting effects • Paradigmatic effects.

  23. Influence: Theory 3a 3. Direct, but deeper, effects or influence (“Secondary effects”): A. Agenda-setting effects: • Defines what is NB. • Affects not what you think, but what you think about. • Plays to advantage of specific forces.

  24. Influence: Theory 3b 3. Direct, but deeper, effects or influence (“Secondary effects”): B. Paradigmatic effects: • How you think about the agenda: • i.e. “framing” what has been “primed”. • Thiseffect defines reality & norms. • Defines what is wise, normal, praiseworthy, acceptable, right. And what is: • deviant, disgusting, outdated, unacceptable.

  25. Influence: summing up What theories we’ve covered: • Stimulus-response effects • Modified S-R • Uses and gratifications • Agenda-setting • Paradigms There is value in all of them. Media impacts on public opinion and policy in all these ways

  26. CONCLUSION • Audience role and “decoding” • Public Opinion – fact or fiction? • Summing up impact

  27. Audience role Media effects are subject to receiver decoding: • hegemonic, (b) negotiated, (c) oppositional a. “Hegemonic decoding”: Reinforcing influence operates at 2ndary level. You accept the media’s agenda, the paradigm & the attitude-opinion effects.

  28. Audience role cntd b. “Negotiated decoding”: You accept the paradigm, maybe even agenda, you stop at the attitudinal stuff. Question: Why? Ans: Situated & Mediated meaning levels c. “Oppositional decoding”: a “weak effects” approach. Implies a resistance orientation.

  29. Public opinion: fact or fiction? Very notion itself of Public Opinion can be argued to be an effect of media coverage. A construct that masks real power – that of media, their owners and their sources (such as govt or PR companies). Self-fulfilling: policy people – who influence so much media coverage – gain their own understanding of Public Opinion from the self-same media.

  30. Policy impact: But even fictions have impacts: • Affect the circuit of policy making, via media & bypassing media, and upon media (affecting its interests & operations). • Influence the decoding by audiences: the setting of media agendas and framing • Influence audience decoding via effect on knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

  31. Summing up Media, public, policy people = a dynamic & powerful triangle! that is sometimes not a triangle! and that works at diff levels, issues, times!

  32. Understanding Journalists need to grasp the complexities and the nuances about actors, PO, influence. In this way, strategise & heighten our impact The continent needs optimum relationships. Think about it. Act upon it. Be a conscious player in public opinion

More Related