1 / 23

Habitat Use and Substrate Preference of Eastern Sand Darters in Vermont

Habitat Use and Substrate Preference of Eastern Sand Darters in Vermont. Shannon O’Brien and Douglas E. Facey Department of Biology, Saint Michael’s College Colchester, Vermont USA. http://faculty.juniata.edu/yohn/esdarter.htm. Outline. Background on the eastern sand darter

alamea
Download Presentation

Habitat Use and Substrate Preference of Eastern Sand Darters in Vermont

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Habitat Use and Substrate Preference of Eastern Sand Darters in Vermont Shannon O’Brien and Douglas E. Facey Department of Biology, Saint Michael’s College Colchester, Vermont USA http://faculty.juniata.edu/yohn/esdarter.htm

  2. Outline • Background on the eastern sand darter • Methods and results from field studies • Methods and results from the lab experiment • General conclusions

  3. Introduction • Globally rare • Historical decline in other parts of their range, perhaps due to habitat alterations • Little historical data is available for the populations found in Vermont

  4. Objective • Field Studies (2001 and 2002) • Compare the substrate composition and the number of Eastern Sand Darters found to determine if their distribution was related to the substrate

  5. QUEBEC Richelieu River Missisquoi River Plattsburgh Lamoille River Winooski River Burlington NEW YORK VERMONT 0 20 kilometers Poultney River Study Sites • Poultney River (2001) • southern most part of Lake Champlain • 1-mile stretch • Winooski River (2002) • Near Burlington, VT • 6-mile stretch

  6. Field Methods • Sampled 10 X 3 m plots in areas that were less than 1 m deep • Substrate sample for each plot • Recorded number of fish caught for each plot focusing on ESD Analysis • Chi square for Poisson distribution to determine if randomly distributed

  7. Analysis • Separated substrate samples with sieves • 7 Substrate size categories • <.12mm • 0.12-0.23mm • 0.23-0.54mm • 0.54-1.0mm • 1.0-1.9mm • 1.9-4.1mm • >4.1mm • Calculated % composition by mass for each substrate size category

  8. Results from the Poultney River 42 eastern sand darters were found in 19 of the 99 different plots http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dfwmr/wildlife/endspec/estsndrt.html

  9. Results – Poultney River • Chi square(x2)= 17.85, P = 0.00002 , df=1 • Eastern sand darters were not randomly distributed according to the Chi square results for the Poisson Distribution

  10. Results – Poultney River • General Trends Between Eastern Sand Darter Density and Substrate Composition • Lowest density in plots with the highest percentage of gravel (> 1.9 mm) • Density increased as the percentage of gravel decreased, in most cases • The plots with 4 and 6 eastern sand darters had a high percentage of fine and medium sand (0.12-0.23 mm and 0.23-0.54 mm)

  11. Results from the Winooski River • 112 eastern sand darters were found in 12 of the 56 plots • Seventy-four of the eastern sand darters were caught in one plot http://www.nanfa.org/meetings/2001/pictures/cs/cs.htm

  12. Results – Winooski River • Chi square(x2)= 199.2, P = 6.07 x 10-43 • Eastern sand darters were not randomly distributed according the Chi square results for the Poisson Distribution

  13. Results – Winooski River • General Trends Between Eastern Sand Darter Density and Substrate Composition • Less abundant in areas with a high percentage of gravel (> 1.0 mm) • Large densities found in areas with a higher percentage of medium- sized sand (0.23-0.54 mm) and more coarse sand (0.54-1.0 mm)

  14. Summary of Results • Eastern sand darters were not randomly distributed in either river • Trends for eastern sand darter distribution and substrate composition • Higher density of fish in areas with low percentage of coarse substrate • Usually a high percentage of medium sized sand in areas with more eastern sand darters • Field studies did not test preference so followed up with a lab experiment to test preference

  15. Objective • Lab Study (2002) • Determine if eastern sand darters prefer a certain size particle when given a choice of 4 different sizes within a tank • Predictions • Eastern sand darters will show a preference for the smaller sized substrate

  16. Divided the bottom of 4 tanks into 4 equally sized rectangles with plastic dividers ~2.5 cm high Filled each rectangle with one of four different size particles 0.23-0.54 mm, 0.54-1.0 mm, 1.0-1.9 mm, or 1.9 -4.1 mm Each tank had a different orientation of the four particle sizes Fish were kept for one week and observed daily, approximately every 2 hours Recorded which size sediment they were over or burrowed into Performed chi square using the first observation made for each fish on their 4th day in the tank Determined if eastern sand darters showed a preference for burrowing in a substrate consisting of a certain sized particle Methods for Lab

  17. Results – Lab Study • A total of 49 fish were observed between August 2002 and Oct 2002 • Based on a total of 912 observations, eastern sand darters were burrowed 790 times (86.6 %) and were not burrowed 122 times (13.3 %)

  18. Eastern sand darters burrowed the most in sediment less than 1.0mm (73%)

  19. Used first observation made on 4th day for each fish that was burrowed (N=46) Chi square(x2)= 19.6, P< 0.005 , df=3 Showed a statistically significant preference for sediment ranging in size 0.23-1.0 mm Chi Square Analysis

  20. Conclusions • The Lab results supported the field observations from both the Poultney and Winooski Rivers • Utilize and prefer areas with a high percentage of sediment 0.23-1.0 mm in size • Sediment size influences their distribution • Indicates they are selective • Alterations in the sediment of rivers may impact their ability to utilize certain habitats

  21. Acknowledgements • Thanks to… • The Vermont Nature Conservancy, which generously funded the Poultney River Project in 2001 • The Lake Champlain Research Consortium for funding both the Poultney and Winooski River work • The Clare Boothe Luce Scholarship Fund which also providing funding for both projects References Daniels, R.A. 1989. Significance of burying in Ammocryptapellucida. Copeia 1989:29-34. Daniels, R.A. 1993. Habitat of the eastern sand darter, Ammocryptapellucida. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 8: 287-295. Facey, D. E. 1998. Status of the Eastern sand darter (Ammocryptapellucida) in Vermont. Canadian Field-Naturalist 112: 596-601

More Related