1 / 26

ORDERS OF PROTECTION Guns and Forms

ORDERS OF PROTECTION Guns and Forms. Order of Protection. June 22, 2005 Annual Judicial Conference. Judge Elizabeth R. Finn Presiding Judge Glendale City Court. State Firearms Statute. Defendant can be prohibited from possessing or purchasing firearms . State Firearms Statute.

albany
Download Presentation

ORDERS OF PROTECTION Guns and Forms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ORDERS OF PROTECTIONGuns and Forms Order of Protection June 22, 2005 Annual Judicial Conference Judge Elizabeth R. Finn Presiding Judge Glendale City Court

  2. State Firearms Statute Defendant can be prohibited from possessing or purchasing firearms

  3. State Firearms Statute • Court finds credible threat to physical safety • Defendant shall not possess firearms or (checkbox) ammunition • Defendant shall transfer firearms immediately but no less than 24 hours after service

  4. Lautenberg Amendment18 U.S.C. 925 (a)(1) • No possession of firearm if convicted of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence • Effective date September 30, 1996 • Relationship test: marriage, lived together or child in common • No exemptions BUT RETROACTIVE • A.R.S. 13-907 applies if no serious physical injury or deadly weapon or victim under 15 years of age

  5. STATE STATUTE BRADY INDICATOR 6. The Court finds that the Defendant represents a credible threat to the physical safety of the Plaintiff and/or may inflict bodily injury or death on the Plaintiff. 10. 6. The Court finds that the Defendant represents a credible threat to the physical safety of the Plaintiff and/or may inflict bodily injury or death on the Plaintiff. 10. The Defendant received actual notice of this hearing and had an opportunity to participate and the plaintiff and defendant have the relationship of intimate partner.

  6. BRADY-FIREARMS Subtitle D 110401 • 18 U.S.C. 921(a),922(d) & 926(a) • Must be intimate partner (child, spouse or former or living together now or in past) • No finding of credible threat necessary – do not have to check #6 • Lasts for the length of the order • Issued after hearing in which person received actual notice • Exemptions

  7. Contrasts • State statute • Protective orders only • No hearing required • No relationship required • Lasts length of order • No exemptions • Brady • Only AFTER a hearing • Must meet relationship test • Lasts length of Order • Exemptions • Lautenberg • Criminal convictions • Relationship test • Lifetime prohibition • No exemptions

  8. Assume Relationship Met • Judge holds hearing – no changes – what paperwork needs to be generated? • Notice to Sheriff of Brady Disqualification

  9. BRADY FORM IF NO CHANGES AFTER HEARING Court Case No. Court No., NCIC Court No., DPS ___________________ Plaintiff ___________________ Date of Birth -vs- ___________________ Defendant _____________________________ NOTICE TO SHERIFF OF BRADY DISQUALIFICATION No change at hearing

  10. Changes in New Forms

  11. Current Form

  12. New Form AZ Prohibits Release of SSN

  13. New Form AZ Prohibits Release of SSN

  14. New Form AZ Prohibits Release of SSN

  15. Current Warnings

  16. AZ Prohibits Release of SSN

  17. Verify Validity AZ Prohibits Release of SSN

  18. Current FormMandatory Orders

  19. New Form Mandatory Orders

  20. Current Form

  21. New Form AZ Prohibits Release of SSN

  22. Changes • Member of household • Combined line for school and other • Deleted setting for hearing • Merged counseling line into other • Brady not mentioned • Use Notice to Sheriff form

  23. Changed Logic • Instead of saying: No contact in person, in writing etc., now will state • No contact except as checked. So if no checks, then no contact at all • Will save time for judges • Will save data entry for clerks • Will be more enforceable by law enforcement providing more victim safety

  24. New No Contact Phrase

  25. More to Come • Workgroup still working on other forms • AOC will need time to program CPOR • AOC will need time to program AZTEC to produce the form and update CPOR • Contact: • bobjames@superiorcourt.maricopa.gov • efinn@glendaleaz.com

More Related