1 / 19

MUCH detector layout studies

MUCH detector layout studies. Outline MUCH detector FRRC project plan Implementation of realistic module design Segmentation algorithm Visual display for MUCH Straws in MUCH. Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (PNPI & SPbSPU). MUCH detector. Purpose : measurements of

aleda
Download Presentation

MUCH detector layout studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MUCH detector layout studies • Outline • MUCH detector • FRRC project plan • Implementation of realistic module design • Segmentation algorithm • Visual display for MUCH • Straws in MUCH Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (PNPI & SPbSPU)

  2. MUCH detector • Purpose: measurements of • vector meson decays: • J/ψ →µ+µ- • φ→ µ+µ- • ω→ µ+µ- • Physics impact: in-medium modification of hadrons, chiral symmetry restoration, deconfinement at high baryonic densities. • The main design feature: sandwich stracture – active absorbers for the suppression of background hadrons and efficient tracking of signal muons FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  3. Track statistics / central event FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  4. FRRC Project plan • Research method based on Monte-Carlo simulation of detector response. • Framework: CBMROOT + UrQMD generator + Geant3. • Steps: • Development of flexible software tools aimed for realistic geometry simulations. • Implementation of passive materials and support structures. • Development of tracking algorithms tuned for dimuon reconstruction. • Development of visualization tools. • Optimization of absorbers: position, materials, thickness. • Optimization of detector segmentation. • Choice of detector type (GEM, micromegas, straws etc). • Main expected result: realistic detector concept which meets experimental challenges in the most optimal and cost-effective way. FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  5. Old (simplified) design • Stations are simulated as simple shapes – 3 mm disks filled with argon gas • Distances between layers and absorbers are not realistic (too small) • No support structures, no module design • Parameter files are huge, full of irrelevant numbers, hardly readable, not flexible FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  6. Module design in ALICE FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  7. Schematic layout of GEM module Pads Readout electronics PCB Argon Spacer Support structure Fasteners GEM foils FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  8. Implementation of module design Front side Back side Overlap • Layers: • Modules are arranged in rows on both sides of each layer • There is an overlap of active volumes to avoid dead zones in y direction FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  9. Support structures and modules • Support structures: • Each support structure is composed of two parts to assure easy installation around the pipe • Estimated thickness ~ 1.5 cm • Material: carbon plastics (ρ = 0.1 ρC) • Implemented as composite shapes in cbmroot • Module: • Module size is mostly restricted by the GEM foil production technology • Active volume: 256 x 256 mm x 3 mm, argon • Spacers: 5 cm in y, 0.5 cm in x; material: noryl, implemented as composite shapes • Active volume implemented as TGeoBox for simple modules and as composite shapes for modules with a hole X spacers Active volume Y spacers FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  10. Detailed geometry: general view Module design Simple design • Two layers at each station • Three layers at the last trigger station • Modules are automatically located on the surface of support structures • Cables, gas tubes, PCBs and front-end electronics are neglected at the moment FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  11. Geometry input file: much_standard_straws.geo # General information MuchCave Zin position [cm] : 105 Acceptance tangent min : 0.1 Acceptance tangent max : 0.5 Number of absorbers : 6 Number of stations : 6 # Absorber specification Absorber Zin position [cm] : 0 40 80 120 170 225 Absorber thickness [cm] : 20 20 20 30 35 100 Absorber material : I I I I I I # Station specification Station Zceneter [cm] : 30 70 110 160 215 340 Number of layers : 2 2 2 3 3 3 Detector type : 1 1 1 2 2 2 Distance between layers [cm]: 10 10 10 7 7 7 Support thickness [cm] : 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Use module design (0/1) : 1 1 1 0 0 0 # GEM module specification (type 1) Active volume lx [cm] : 25.6 Active volume ly [cm] : 25.6 Active volume lz [cm] : 0.3 Spacer lx [cm] : 0.5 Spacer ly [cm] : 5 Overlap along y axis [cm] : 2 # Straw module specification (type 2) Straw thickness [cm] : 0.4 FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  12. Class hierarchy CbmMuchGeoScheme CbmMuchStation CbmMuchLayer CbmMuchLayerSide CbmMuchModule CbmMuchSector CbmMuchPad FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  13. Automatic segmentation: algorithm y Hit density vs R x // Set minimum allowed resolution for each station Double_t sigmaXmin[] = {0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04}; Double_t sigmaYmin[] = {0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04, 0.04}; seg->SetSigmaMin(sigmaXmin, sigmaYmin); // Set maximum allowed resolution for each station Double_t sigmaXmax[] = {0.32, 0.32, 0.32, 0.32, 0.32, 0.32}; Double_t sigmaYmax[] = {0.32, 0.32, 0.32, 0.32, 0.32, 0.32}; seg->SetSigmaMax(sigmaXmax, sigmaYmax); // Set maximum occupancy for each station Double_t occupancyMax[] = {0.05, 0.05, 0.05, 0.05, 0.05, 0.05}; seg->SetOccupancyMax(occupancyMax); FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  14. Automatic segmentation: results Simple design Module design • Sector sizes at the first station are mostly determined by occupancy restrictions • Starting from the 3rd station sector sizes are determined by the required resolution • The smallest pad size in the default setup is ~2 mm (resolution ~ 600 μm). FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  15. Visual Event Display: Layer view Layer view functionality: • Switch between stations and layers • Info on stations • Zoom • Show info on hits, points and sectors • Switch off sectors, modules, layer sides, hits and points • Select particles with required PDG code and mothers • Browse events • Clickable sectors producing zoomed module views FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  16. Visual Event Display: Module View Zoomed module view Fired pads are marked with blue gradient colors reflecting the accumulated charge Found hits are marked with black markers FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  17. Visual Event Display: Cluster View Cluster view can be opened by clicking on a cluster in a module frame. It is aimed to help in optimization of hit finding algorithms. FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  18. Straw tubes in Much geometry 4 m;  4 mm robustness high detection efficiency 100% geom. acceptance 97%/m rate capability 4 MHz/cm2 spatial resolution 200 m radiation length 0.2 % X0 granularity > 10 cm2 occupancy > 10% FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

  19. Calendar plan FRRC seminar, 9 June 2009

More Related