1 / 12

Fighting corruption in the Italian Public Sector Law N ovember 6 2012

Fighting corruption in the Italian Public Sector Law N ovember 6 2012. Prof. Fabio Cintioli Scuola Nazionale di Amministrazione. Corruption in Italian P ublic Sector

alexis
Download Presentation

Fighting corruption in the Italian Public Sector Law N ovember 6 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fightingcorruption in the Italian Public SectorLaw November 6 2012 Prof. Fabio Cintioli Scuola Nazionale di Amministrazione

  2. Corruption in ItalianPublic Sector (i) a problemfor the Administration, in terms of compliance with European and nationalregulations; in terms of reaching the goals of public bodies and assessing the national public interest (buona amministrazione ex art. 97 Costituzione della Repubblica italiana); (ii) a violation of fundamentalEuropeanrights, according to the citizens’ right to goodadministration; (iii) a weakness for the institutional and economicsystemas a whole in the era of crisis.

  3. The tools of the new law: (i) new criminaloffences; (ii) a code of conduct for the administrationprovided by the law: anticorruptionas an intermediarylevelbetween the criminalsector and the administrativeregulation; a new meaning of the word corruption in the Italianlegalsystem;

  4. (iii) enhancingtransparency; (iv) assessingpotentialconflictsof interest in the public bodies; (v) improvingcompetition in the public procurementsector.

  5. New offences • Corruptionbetween private parties • An increase in sanctions • More information sharedbetween public bodies and criminalprosecutors

  6. More transparency in administrativeprocedures • Law August 8, 1990, n. 241: transparencyin administrativeprocedures in order to protect a single citizen’s particular right before the AdministrativeBodies: the defensivefunction of transparency; • Transparencyas a value: the interest of the citizens (and political parties, NGOs, etc.) in having a full knowledge of public actions in order to make the Public Sector fullyaccountable.

  7. e.g. the obligation to explain the legal and factualbasis of a permit (the duty of a full explanation of the decisions: article 3, law 1990 n. 241): in the interest of the citizenwhoisasking for it and in the general interest in a transparentadministrativeaction; • the role of the internet; the use of internet as a duty for officials;

  8. > the right of access to administrativedocuments and information: from the entitlement of the single citizenwhoisinterested in the particular procedure to the widespread right allowed to everycitizen;

  9. More transparencyabout the personal situation, performance and interest of officials and employees • The anticorruptionprograms and the most sensitive sectors: • (i) The anticorruptionprogram of the Public Sector Ministry; • (ii) The anticorruptionprogram of the single Administrative Body;

  10. (iii) giving the rules of a new code of conduct to the Public Sector; • (iv) preventingcorruption and wrongdoing in the internalaffairs of the Administration; • The role of the officialresponsible for compliancewith the anticorruption law and hisowndisciplinaryliability.

  11. Avoiding the potentialconflict of interest in administrativeprocedures • A new regulationabout the candidability and the legitimacy of access to parliamentary, governmental and public offices • Transparency for elected members of Parliament and Regional Council

  12. New regulation for transparency in public procurementtenders • The riskytrade-off betweenregulation and efficiency. The widespread duty of launchingtenders in the selection of contractors • The extension of the transparencyrules to the state-owned company: the limits and pros and cons

More Related