1 / 14

A brief history of regulation

Regulation: The Journey 13 th November 2013 John O’Mahony Assistant Director Regulatory Framework & Performance Homes & Communities Agency. A brief history of regulation. The Housing Corporation’s compliance based approach The TSA’s move to an assurance based approach

allayna
Download Presentation

A brief history of regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regulation: The Journey13th November 2013John O’MahonyAssistant Director Regulatory Framework & PerformanceHomes & Communities Agency

  2. A brief history of regulation • The Housing Corporation’s compliance based approach • The TSA’s move to an assurance based approach • TSA strong focus on consumer regulation role • A very low tolerance of failure on viability issues

  3. The Current Model • A progression from previous approaches, recognising the regulatory inheritance and the skills and capabilities at our disposal • Designed to focus on obtaining assurance about compliance with economic standards and in particular on governance and viability • Designed to enable the regulator to spot issues before they become unmanageable problems • Predicated on protecting social housing assets (and associated debt)

  4. Types of provider • Long-tailed market in transition • 1,200 stock-owning PRPs • 900 <1,000 units (RASA): 4% stock & falling • 300 >1,000 units: 96% stock • 67 >10,000+ units: 51% stock & growing • For-profitsown negligible stock • 350 providers in groups: 74% units

  5. Key financials • Sector assets: £119bn • Funded by £48bn private finance, £44bn grant • Social housing turnover: £11.6bn (up 8%) • Operating costs: £9.8bn (£3.9k/unit, up 1.9%) • Surplus after tax: £1.8bn – up £700m due to: • Sector-wide interest cover = 116% (up from 106%) • Recent Stock transfers normally <100% • Maturing stock transfer sub-sector is a driver * All figures 2011/12 Global Accounts of Housing Associations. Figures in brackets 2010/11 Global Accounts.

  6. Our view • Sector adapting to challenging times • Operating margins strengthening since 2008/09 • Falling real operating cost/unit since 2008/09 • Governance and Financial Viability Judgements • 4 strap-lines: G1 to G4 and V1 to V4 • Since December 2012 published 180 judgements for RPs:

  7. Roles and responsibilities – key players in Government • DCLG on housing policy framework • HCA grant-funds new homes / stock transfer / regeneration; except in London – GLA • HMT interest in capital funding, macro-economy • HMT/DWP on welfare • Local Authorities • Planning • Allocations etc. • Funder (SP etc.) • As provider (with a self-financing HRA )

  8. Roles and responsibilities – key players in private sector • Housing Associations • New “for-profit” entrants • Lenders • Representative bodies (NHF, Northern Housing Consortium, PlaceShapers’, CIH)

  9. The rationale for regulation Theory • Absence of market levers for tenants • Weak incentives to deliver VFM / optimise market structure Bottom line • Government has invested £44bn, and wants that money to protect stock and deliver HB savings • Lenders take comfort from regulation / tacit Government support – reflected in cost debt and therefore cost of grant

  10. A bespoke regulatory settlement • Evolved alongside grant arrangements • Key role to provide lenders comfort • Limited role on consumer protection • Price controls lie with Government • Majority of providers are not-for-profit and will recycle surpluses • New entrants can now include for-profit providers

  11. Role of HCA Regulation – regulatory controls and powers • The regulator has four main controls: • It sets registration criteria that aspiring entrants have to meet • It sets standards that all providers have to meet and publishes judgements • It has a disposal consents regime that controls the disposal and charging of social housing assets • It has a constitutional consents regime that controls the restructuring of not for profit providers • It also a range of intervention powers that it can use to ensure its standards are being met • These range from enforcement notices through to the ability to remove stock from providers after a statutory inquiry

  12. How has the model changed • Private Finance….historic debt is “under-water”; margins, longevity, capital market • Welfare reform….cuts (under-occupation, dependants), Universal credit and direct payment……new caps in Spending Round 2015/16 • Indexation of rents…traditionally RPI+1/2%; Spending Round 2015/16: moved to CPI +1% per year from 2015-16 for 10 years. • Grant…were once c.50% costs, now c.15%

  13. How has the model changed (cont.) • S106….market development limited and contribution not returning to pre-credit crunch levels • Diversificationwithin the sector (activities, business structures, for profits entrants, commercialisation of traditional sector) • Regulation….period of transition over the past 5 years……. the Regulation Committee …..…changes to the Regulatory Framework……….Fees and link to VfM announcement in Spending Round 2015/16

  14. Success to date • The sector and the regulator have successfully navigated the economic slowdown despite some close calls • The regulator has maintained core focus on viability throughout the other upheavals • The regulator has found an operating model that has dealt with the governance failures that have occurred but without often using formal powers • The sector is still able to access funding at highly competitive rates

More Related