1 / 21

6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE

6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE. performance-based Maintenance approach DB/P3. Edward P. Pensock, Jr. P.E. Strategic Project Division Director Texas Department of Transportation. Design-Build vs. CDA Contracts. Design-Build. CDA. Does not include private financing Not a prescriptive design

allen-perez
Download Presentation

6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 6THANNUAL CONFERENCE

  2. performance-based Maintenance approach DB/P3 Edward P. Pensock, Jr. P.E. Strategic Project Division Director Texas Department of Transportation

  3. Design-Build vs. CDA Contracts Design-Build CDA • Does not include private financing • Not a prescriptive design • Innovation by the Developer • Review at project level as packages are released • Coordination with FHWA as needed • May include optional Capital Maintenance Agreement • Limited to 3 projects per fiscal year approved by Commission • Construction must be estimated at $50 million or more • Similar to D-B, but may be done as: • Toll Concession • Design-Build Finance(f) • Design-Build-Operate-Maintain • Design-Build-Maintain • Design-Build • Use of independent engineer • More risk transfer than D-B • May include private financing • Limited to specific projects identified in Senate Bill 1730 11

  4. TxDOT Business Programs • Delivery Methods: Risk Allocation Assignments1 1 Actual risk assignments may vary by project 2 Eminent Domain delays retained by the owner

  5. DB/P3 Maintenance Contracts • Developer responsible for design, construction, operations, maintenance and handback • Long term 15-25 years Mandatory O&M Period • 5 to15 year O&M Performance Requirements may apply to a DB + CMA

  6. Performance-Based Approach Compensation to TxDOT resulting from Maintenance Contractor’s failure to meet the performance requirements. • Technical Provisions TxDOT defines desired project outcome in the technical requirements General Maintenance Obligations Maintenance Management Plan (Reviewed and Approved by TxDOT) • Performance requirements, • Measurement procedures, • Threshold values at which maintenance is required, • Inspection procedures and frequencies, and • Subsequent maintenance to address noted deficiencies, • Impacts to Related Transportation Facilities

  7. Maintenance Agreements • Non-Compliance Events • D&C Work • O&M Work • Non-Compliance Points • Payment Deductions • Increased oversight if triggers are exceeded • Warning notice of default if points accumulate and exceed threshold • Liquidated Damages • Unplanned lane closures • Safety defect not repaired • Comprehensive Maintenance Agreements and Capital Maintenance Agreements • Option for maintenance agreements if pricing acceptable • Achieves price certainty • Efficient for projects with unique features • Beneficial to achieving long-term ownership of design by the developer • Non-compliance handled through Non-compliance Points or Liquidated Damages

  8. O&M Agreements Examples Concession(50 year term of contract): SH 130 Segments 5 & 6 North Tarrant Expressway Segments 1 & 2 I-635 LBJ Freeway Design/Build(three-5 year Capital Maintenance Agreements): SH 130 Segments 1 - 4 DFW Connector Dallas Dallas Horseshoe SH 99 (Grand Parkway) Segments F1, F2, and G IH 35E Managed Lanes Project Loop 1604 Western Extension

  9. O&M Agreements Examples • Design-Build – Extended Comprehensive Maintenance Agreements (COMA) • SH 183 Managed Lanes – • 25 year maintenance responsibility (also includes five year extended construction financing) • Loop 375 Border Highway West – • 15 year maintenance responsibility

  10. Questions? Edward P. Pensock, Jr., P.E. Strategic Projects Division Texas Department of Transportation Office: 512-936-0903 E-Mail: Ed.Pensock@txdot.gov

  11. 6THANNUAL CONFERENCE

  12. Key Considerations in TxDOT’sTotal Maintenance Specification John Roberts TxDOT Maintenance Division Performance-Based Contracts

  13. Key Considerations • Internal Input • Industry Input • Effect Measures of Performance

  14. Internal Input • Meeting with internal personnel to develop expectations of performance that are realistic/desired. • Evaluate input to provide consistency of expectations statewide. Goal = buy-in

  15. INDUSTRY INPUT • Are our expectations realistic? • Bring good ideas for better execution. • Have we provided clear communication of expectations? Goal = decrease risk during execution

  16. Effect Measures of Performance • Condition Assessment • Key Performance Indicators (KPI) • Payment Reduction Strategy Goal = Perform. Get Paid Don’t Perform. Don’t Get Paid

  17. What are the results?

  18. What are the results? • Failure to submit the initial Quality Management Plan within the first 60 days = 5% reduction in payment the 1stmonth & then a 10 % reduction in payment thereafter. • Failure to submit the Safety Plan within the first 30 days = 5%percent reduction in payment in the 1stmonth & a 10% reduction in payment each month thereafter. • Others

  19. Example kpis

  20. KPI Payment methodology # of Meeting Requirements/Total # of Occurrences = % Compliance

  21. Questions John A. Roberts, P.E. (512) 416-3083 John.Roberts@txdot.gov

More Related