640 likes | 649 Views
A New Developing Curriculum on the Transition Effects of the Vocational Training for Adult Learning Program – A Case Study of the Funeral Mortician Services. Presented by Kuei-Chih Chuang 1 Ph.D., Hung-Ju Tsai 2 Graduate School of Vocation & Technological Education
E N D
A New Developing Curriculum on the Transition Effects of the Vocational Training for Adult Learning Program – A Case Study of the Funeral Mortician Services Presented by Kuei-Chih Chuang 1 Ph.D., Hung-Ju Tsai 2 Graduate School of Vocation & Technological Education National Yunlin University of Science & Technology chuangkc@yuntech.edu.tw, g9643215@yuntech.edu.tw
Research Background • Considerations of adult learning development and utilization in transition training • Aging society increases the possibility of career transition. • Funeral Mortician Services (FMS)
Research Motivation • Demands of adult learning development • Self-development experiences • Effectiveness of career transition training in FMS industry
Research Objectives • To examine the variances between variables and effectiveness of transition training. • To examine the relationship between variables and effectiveness of transition training
Research Objectives (cont.) • To examine the correlation between trainee’s characteristics, teaching course, career support and effectiveness of transition training. • To examine the predictability between trainee’s characteristics, teaching course, career support and effectiveness of transition training.
Research Hypothesis • Each individual variable of FMS is independent. • There is no significant relationship between variables and effectiveness of transition training.
Research Hypothesis (cont.) • Each individual variable of FMS is interrelated. • There is a significant relationship between variables and transition training effectiveness.
Definition of Terms • Adults • Funeral Service Industry • Transition training
Scope of Research • Research objects • Samples • Selection
Limitations • Research objects • Source of samples • Source of research materials
Literature Review • Characteristics of adult learners • Concepts of transition training • Factors may influence the effectiveness of transition training • Relevant study of transition training • Contents of FMS
Fundamental of adult learning development • Characteristics of adult learning development • Adult learning principles
Concepts of Transition Training • Basic concepts • Meaning • Theories
Effecting Factors of Transition Training • Trainee’s characteristics • Course design • Workplace
Funeral Mortician Services (FMS) • Definition of FMS • Job classification • Job characteristics
Research Approach • Structure of research • Research process • Research objects • Means • Data management
Research Objects • 540 samples • Received over 280 hrs pre-service training from Jan. to Dec. 2008 • Qualified trainees who were re-employed.
Research Tools • Scale of effectiveness • Personal details • Learning motivation • Training course • Career support • Effectiveness of transition training
Research Tools (cont.) • Pre-test analysis: • 77/90 effective questionnaires (85.6%). • 60 questions remained after item, factor and reliability analysis. • Sample questionnaire: • 352/450 were collected (78.2%) • 330 of them were effective.
Pre-test Analysis(1/3) • Item Analysis • Using critical ration and relevant analysis to process question selection. • Using t ratio to determine the question differences through the group of the highest 27% and the lowest 27% of effective questionnaires. • Significance level must reach .01 and the absolute value of critical ration must be higher than 3.0. • The standard of question selection: absolute value: higher than .30with .01 significance level. • 1-6, 2-12, 3-1,3-16,3-19 were cut out.
Factor Analysis(2/3) • The KMO value of learning motivation is .818; teaching course .906, career support .871; transition training effectiveness .862 • KMO>.80 • 3-8, 4-2 were cut out.
Pre-test Analysis(3/3) • Reliability Analysis
Research Methodology • Questionnaire survey research • Interview
Data Management • Quantitative analysis • Qualitative interview survey
Analysis of Variances – Background Variables • There is no significant difference in trainee’s characteristics (P>.05). • There is a significant difference in employment situation (P=.000<.001) • H null is partially accepted.
Analysis of Variances – Background Variables (Cont.) • There is no significant difference in training course (P>.05). • There is a significant difference in employment situation (P=.000<.05) • H null is partially accepted.
Analysis of Variances – Background Variables (cont.) • There is no significant difference in career support (P>.05). • There is a significant difference in employment situation (P=.000<.05). • H null is partially accepted.
Analysis of Variances – Background Variables • There is no significant difference btw background variables and transition training effectiveness. • Gender, education, employment, expenses in the period between pre and post training shows there is a significant difference (P<.001).
Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness • H2-1:There is no significant difference between genders and training effectiveness. – Accepted
Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) • H2-2:There is no significant difference btw age and training effectiveness. – Rejected.
Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) • H2-3:There is no significant difference btw education level and training effectiveness. – Rejected.
Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) • H2-7:There is no significant difference btw martial status and training effectiveness.- Accepted
Analysis of Variance – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) • H2-8:There is no significant difference btw family financial burden and training effectiveness - Accepted
Analysis of Variances – Background Variables versus Training Effectiveness (cont.) • H2-6:There is no significant difference btw pre-training employment status and training effectiveness. - Rejected