1 / 17

Single Photon Detector Workshop NIST Gaithersburg

Single Photon Detector Workshop NIST Gaithersburg. Physical Model for Dark Count and the Development of InGaAs/Si Single Photon Detectors. Y.-H. Lo , Yimin Kang, Huaxin Lu UC San Diego A. Pauchard, M. Bitter, Z. Pan, R. Dimitrov, S. Hummel Nova Crystals, Inc. Outline.

amiel
Download Presentation

Single Photon Detector Workshop NIST Gaithersburg

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Single Photon Detector Workshop NIST Gaithersburg Physical Model for Dark Count and the Development of InGaAs/Si Single Photon Detectors Y.-H. Lo, Yimin Kang, Huaxin Lu UC San Diego A. Pauchard, M. Bitter, Z. Pan, R. Dimitrov, S. Hummel Nova Crystals, Inc.

  2. Outline • Physical model for dark count and afterpulsing effect • - critical dependence on device parameters and operational conditions. • - single photon quantum efficiency and the importance of k-factor (electron/hole ionization ratio) • Development of InGaAs/Si APDs

  3. Counting in the Dark Dark count probability: Pd = 1 - e (-Nd*) the probability that there is at least one dark carrier triggering a breakdown when the average effective dark carriers number is Nd* where Nd*= Nd Pa Nd is the number of dark carriers in SPAPD’s gain region within gated pulse duration Pa is the probability of a carrier initiating an avalanche with Geiger mode gain [1] Dark carrier generation + Avalanche initiation Dark count [1] R.J. McIntyre, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-20, pp.637-641, 1973.

  4. 1 t I 2 t t Ntrapped0/td T t 3 4 Four Mechanisms for Dark Carrier Generation Primary dark carrier: IDM -- primary dark current which undergoes the multiplication process Residual primary dark carrier: GB -- gain-bandwidth product of APD M0 -- gain when APD is biased at the DC offset Afterpulse dark carrier: Residual afterpulse dark carrier: td -- detrap time T-- pulse period t*tr -- transit time Ntrapped0 -- trapped carriers per pulse

  5. t Effect of Primary Dark Current on Dark Count Dark count rate is approximately proportional to the primary dark current IDM of APD, provided afterpulse effect is negligible. • voltage pulse width: 2ns • detrap time td : 200ns • pulse repetition rate f: • 100kHz • GB = 30GHz • DC offset gain M0 :5

  6. I t Effects of the DC Bias and the Gain-Bandwidth Product Low DC bias (therefore low DC gain) and large GB product can reduce the dark count rate, but the effect is relatively modest. • voltage pulse width: 2ns • detrap time td : 200ns • pulse repetition rate f: • 100kHz • IDM=0.1pA

  7. Effect of Afterpulse The contribution of afterpulse depends critically on the ratio between the detrap time and the interpulse interval. When td/T > 10%, the afterpulse effect rises sharply. • voltage pulse width: 2ns • single-photon quantum • efficiency: 20% • number of photon per • pulse: 0.1pp • Gain at DC offset M0: 10

  8. Afterpulse Effect (Cont.) The relative importance of afterpulse effect increases with the increasing Geiger mode threshold gain. • Voltage pulse width: 2ns • Single-photon quantum • efficiency: 20% • Number of photon per • pulse: 0.1pp • Gain at DC offset: 10

  9. k=0.002 k=0.02 k=0.002 Photoelectron Detection Probability Breakdown Probability k=0.02 Voltage in excess of Vb ,and is roughly proportional to V/Vb Breakdown Probability – Calculation of Single Photon Quantum Efficiency Low ionization ratio (k-factor) increases the breakdown probability triggered by a single incident photon (i.e. high SPQE) * H. Dautet, et.al., Applied Optics, vol.32, No.21, pp.3894-900 (1993). Mt is the discriminator threshold setting.

  10. Simulated Sub-Geiger Mode APD Impulse Response DC Gain used in this simulation: 6,000 (before breakdown) The Geiger-mode gain (within 2ns pulse window) of InGaAs/Si APD is about 40 times higher than InGaAs/InP APD, manifesting the importance of k-factor. The result indicates that InGaAs/Si APDs can have a much higher single-photon quantum efficiency than InGaAs/InP APDs under the same operation condition.

  11. Summary • To achieve low darkcount and high single-photon quantum efficiency, one likes to have APDs that have • Low primary dark current (< 1pA) • Low trap density in the multiplication region • Short detrap time (< 10% of the interpulse time interval) • Low DC bias (low prepulse gain) and high GB product • Small k-factor (critical to single-photon quantum efficiency) All these lead to the conclusion that Si APDs should have superior performance to InGaAs/InP APDs for single-photon detection.

  12. Large Area, Covalently Bonded InGaAs/Si Structure TEM SEM III-V Si 4x4 cm2 InGaAs/Si wafer

  13. InGaAs-on-Si APDs

  14. Room Temperature DC Characteristics of InGaAs/Si APD

  15. Temperature Dependence of Breakdown Voltage Gsi = 0.026 V/C GSi 4 times smaller than GInP

  16. Excess Noise and k-Factor F (M=10) = 2.2 F (M=50) = 2.8

  17. Summary InGaAs/Si APDs can be fabricated on large area wafers with high process yield. InGaAs/Si has shown high DC gain and normal breakdown behavior. Both the k-factor and the temperature dependence of the breakdown voltage of InGaAs/Si APDs are the same as Si APDs. The temperature dependence of the primary dark current needs to be investigated.

More Related