1 / 39

warren sack / film & digital media department / university of california, santa cruz

social networks fdm 20c introduction to digital media lecture 13.04.2004. warren sack / film & digital media department / university of california, santa cruz. waiting list. 1. *** Kelley Lutter 2. *** Drew Little 3. *** Colin Reeves-Fortney 4. Frank Latt 5. *** Pauline Sales

andreas
Download Presentation

warren sack / film & digital media department / university of california, santa cruz

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. social networks fdm 20c introduction to digital media lecture 13.04.2004 warren sack / film & digital media department / university of california, santa cruz

  2. waiting list 1. *** Kelley Lutter 2. *** Drew Little 3. *** Colin Reeves-Fortney 4. Frank Latt 5. *** Pauline Sales 6. *** Janae Patino 7. Dan Kendall 8. Kevin Simpson 9. Stephen Conway 10. *** David Pene 11. David Merino 12. Michael Osorio

  3. waiting list 13. Karina Sainz 14. *** Marc Moorer 15. *** Jill Narciso 16. Scott Miyamoto 17. Kassandra Krause 18. Tyler Parkford 19. Thomas Mazawa 20. John Chou 21. Benjamin Manoochehr 22. Manfred Lee 23. Jonathan Freeman 24. Wendy Kordesch

  4. waiting list 25. Sherman Ng 26. Andrew Drinnan 27. Nicole Kunzik 28. Matthew Hermosillo 29. Caitlin Gilroy 30. Rebecca Reiner 31. Sarah McCaig 32. Joanna Leung 33. *** Victor John Irwin 34. Colin McNany 35. *** Hassan Alyassin 36. Brian Whitney

  5. waiting list 37. Ngoc Nguyen 38. Susan Yong-Tim 39. Noelle Alyassini 40. Kerby Olsen 41. Daniel Ebrahemi 42. Stephen Nesbitt 43. Andrew Borrelli 44. Igor Zingerman 45. Melissa Mabie 46. Cynthia Sarah Singh

  6. last time • the web as a technology • who is tim berners-lee? • an abbreviated reading of “the world-wide web” by berners-lee, et al. • what are URIs, universal resource identifiers? • what is HTML, the hypertext markup language? • what is HTTP, the hypertext transfer protocol? • the web as an art form • lisa jevbratt (1:1) • mark napier (shredder) • rsg collective (carnivore)

  7. key points (so far) • When technologies connect or separate people, they become media. • Technologies embody social, political, cultural, economic and philosophical ideas and relationships. • When a medium is new, it is often used to simulate old media. • New media do not replace old media, they displace them. • People make media and then media make people.

  8. key points • New media technologies usually reinforce existing social networks or even work to isolate people. • (BUT) When new media technologies facilitate new social networks, they simultaneously challenge existing social, political and economic relationships.

  9. outline for today • social networks as science • social networks as technology • social networks as popular culture • social networks as art • mini-project 2: add yourself to friendster

  10. social networks as science: field • social network analysis is an interdisciplinary social science, but has been of especial concern to sociologists; • recently, physicists and mathematicians have made large contributions to understanding networks in general (as graphs) and thus contributed to an understanding of social networks too.

  11. social network as science: definition • [Social network analysis] is grounded in the observation that social actors [i.e., people] are interdependent and that the links [i.e., relationships] among them have important consequences for every individual [and for all of the individuals together]. ... [Relationships] provide individuals with opportunities and, at the same time, potential constraints on their behavior. ... Social network analysis involves theorizing, model building and empirical research focused on uncovering the patterning of links among actors. It is concerned also with uncovering the antecedents and consequences of recurrent patterns. (from Linton C. Freeman)

  12. social network as science: history J.L. Moreno (1934) Friendship choices between 4th grade boys (triangles) and girls (circles)

  13. social networks as science: history kinship studies: Radcliffe-Brown, Levi-Strauss, etc. (see Jeff Tobin, faculty.oxy.edu/tobin/anth100/ outlines/05.html)

  14. social networks as science: history (see Jeff Tobin, faculty.oxy.edu/tobin/anth100/ outlines/05.html)

  15. social networks as science: history • Stanley Milgram (1967) “The Small World Problem,” Psychology Today • Milgram sent 60 letters to various recruits in Wichita, Kansas who were asked to forward the letter to the wife of a divinity student living at a specified location in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The particpants could only pass the letters (by hand) to personal acquaintances who they thought might be able to reach the target - whether directly or via a "friend of a friend". • “six-degrees of separation”

  16. social networks as science: history • Mark Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties” • Sometimes acquaintances are more valuable than friends (e.g., when one is looking for a job).

  17. social networks as science: equivalence A A and B are “structurally equivalent” because they connect to the same people and thus have equivalent positions in the network. B

  18. social networks as science: centrality Diane is central; Jane is not. See www.orgnet.com/sna.html

  19. social networks as science: bridges if you’re a boy in this network (a triangle) and you want to meet a girl (a circle), who are you going to call for an introduction?

  20. social networks as science: bridges this guy, right?

  21. social networks as science: social capital • if you connect separate networks you have bridging capital • if you are central to a network you have bonding capital

  22. social networks as science: bowling alone • sociologist robert putnam claims that united states citizens no longer know or trust their neighbors and thus communities have lost their social capital • when did we start to lose it? after the second world war • what media technology came into wide-spread use after the second world war? • recall today’s key points

  23. social networks as technology • email, newsgroups, and weblogs • in the design of the arpanet (the forerunner to the internet) email was an afterthought!

  24. social networks as technology • search engines: e.g., Google (http://google.com) • Google’s Page Rank algorithm gives more weight to popular webpages. • A webpage is considered popular if many other webpages link to it. • compare this to search engines built specially for weblogs; e.g., Cameron Marlow’s http://blogdex.net

  25. social networks as technology • collaborative filtering and/or recommender systems; e.g., amazon.com’s feature: “People who bought this book also bought...”

  26. social networks as popular culture • e.g., six degrees of kevin bacon • bacon number: definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Degrees_of_Kevin_Bacon • kevin bacon has a bacon number of 0 • an actor, A, has a bacon number of 1 if s/he appeared in a movie with kevin bacon • an actor, B, has a bacon number of 2 if s/he appear in a movie with A • etc. • try this with the internet movie database: e.g., http://imdb.com/name/nm0000102/board/nest/4534991 • or, have it done automatically here, at the “oracle of bacon”: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/oracle/

  27. social networks as popular culture • “Fixing” the networks; e.g., Google hacking • try the query “miserable failure” at google.com

  28. social networks as popular culture • social software; e.g., friendster, orkut, tribe, etc. • recall the article by danah boyd: what happens to social networks when they are explicitly declared? • “[danah] emphasize[s] how users have repurposed the technology to present their identity and connect in personally meaningful ways while the architect works to define and regulate acceptable models of use.” • to understand “artificial” social networks we need to rethink the social scientific concepts of “equivalence,” “centrality,” even “node” and “link.”

  29. social networks as art Ben Discoe’s, Friendster Map http://www.washedashore.com/people/friendster/friendster1.html

  30. social networks as art Mark Lombardi, Global Networks http://www.pierogi2000.com/flatfile/lombardi.html

  31. social networks as art Official Computer Scene Sexchart http://www.attrition.org/hosted/sexchart/

  32. social networks as art • Josh On (Futurefarmers), They Rule • http://www.theyrule.net/

  33. social networks as art Jonah Peretti, Nike Sweatshop Email http://depts.washington.edu/ccce/polcommcampaigns/peretti.html

  34. social networks as art Warren Sack and Sawad Brooks http://translationmap.walkerart.org Warren Sack, Conversation Map http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~sack/cm

  35. social networks as art Angie Waller, Data Mining the Amazon http://www.couchprojects.com/amazonweb/pages/title.htm

  36. social networks as art • Thanks to Steve Dietz for these art links. See here for more examples: http://www.yproductions.com/WebWalkAbout/archives/000377.html#more

  37. visualizing (social) networks • See Martin Dodge’s “Cybergeography” website for many examples of how networks can be visualized: http://www.cybergeography.org/atlas/atlas.html

  38. mini-project two • create a friendster profile for yourself, • link to people who you know in this course, and • draw a social network of the relationships between you, your friendsters, and your friendsters’ friendsters. • due: next tuesday, april 20th

  39. next time • guest lecture by noah wardrip-fruin, artist, writer, and the editor of the new media reader

More Related