1 / 12

Greece – OP “Competitiveness & Entrepreneurship” Pilot Indicators Exercise

Hellenic Republic Ministry of Development, Competitiveness, Infrastructures, Transportation & Networks. Greece – OP “Competitiveness & Entrepreneurship” Pilot Indicators Exercise Managing Authority of Operational Programme  "Competitiveness & Entrepreneurship"   Christos Drymousis

andriam
Download Presentation

Greece – OP “Competitiveness & Entrepreneurship” Pilot Indicators Exercise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hellenic Republic Ministry of Development, Competitiveness, Infrastructures, Transportation & Networks Greece – OP “Competitiveness & Entrepreneurship” Pilot Indicators Exercise Managing Authority of OperationalProgramme  "Competitiveness & Entrepreneurship"   Christos Drymousis UNITA1 - "Programming & Evaluation of OP" March 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

  2. Choice for implementation of New Logical Framework: Energy Sector • Priority Axis 4: Integration of the country's energy system and strengthening of sustainability • Questions: • What are our strategic priorities for the Energy Sector? • Which Result Indicators can demonstrate this direction better? • Will our Output Indicators contribute to change in the Result Indicators? • Do we know the baseline values for 2008? Are there validated data? • Could we evaluate the contribution of policy actions? How?

  3. Restructuring of Priorities

  4. Result Indicators (1/3)

  5. Result Indicators (2/3)

  6. Result Indicators (3/3)

  7. Output Indicators

  8. Implementation in Priority 1

  9. Conclusions (1/3)About Current Framework • Phrasing of the Priority Axis 4 of OP: • not very clear & open to interpretation, but • flexibility to include or substitute a project • Output Indicators: • somehow vague, not always related directly to their results • do not always reflect the intended effects of the OP explicitly • Result Indicators for Natural Gas  referring to committed values (not actual) or to population covered (potentially, but not necessarily) • Result Indicator – “Annual decrease of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CO2)” initially not linked to every action separately, as considered result of all • Heavy reliance on the Monitoring System  fine as long as data reported in a timely and correct manner

  10. Conclusions (2/3)About New Logical Framework • Indicators: • Result  clear & directly linked to policy intervention • Output  well-defined & measurable • Data / Sources: • explicitly identified for each indicator • statistically validated data - promptly collected mostly by Ministry of Environment, Energy & Climate Change • Baseline values: • available only after energy inspections are conducted / no values indicated • difficulties in defining when change can be expected (i.e. consumption of natural gas, real data one year after the end of project)

  11. Conclusions (3/3)General Comments • In the design phase of an OP  wide variety of fields (R&D, Tourism, Entrepreneurship, Financial Engineering, Energy, Culture, etc.): • no information about resource allocation or programme architecture • not always easy to implement the “smart approach” to other areas (i.e. measurement of state aid effect to exports of an enterprise) • sometimes difficult to determine the exact time of expected change to actually emerge • Concentration is the key:fewer indicators - deliberation process • Data / Databases: • proper monitoring – statistically validated past data • identification of intended results that reflect the strategy of the OP • Results: affected by other factors, like great economic crisis & recession (i.e. energy saving not by interventions, but because of decreased oil / electricity consumption in houses)

  12. Q & Q U E S T I O N S A N S W E R S Thank you very much for your attention ! A

More Related