1 / 10

“The Types of Legitimate Domination"

“The Types of Legitimate Domination". Max Weber (1925). Domination/Authority. D omination/authority : the probability that certain specific commands (or all commands) will be obeyed by a given group of persons

anila
Download Presentation

“The Types of Legitimate Domination"

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “The Types of Legitimate Domination" Max Weber (1925)

  2. Domination/Authority • Domination/authority: the probability that certain specific commands (or all commands) will be obeyed by a given group of persons • Every genuine form of domination implies a measure of voluntary compliance, i.e., an interest(based on ulterior motives or genuine acceptance) in obedience

  3. Domination/Authority • Rule over a considerable number of persons requires a staff, or a special group that can normally be trusted to execute general policy as well as specific commands • Obedience can result from a range of motives: • Custom • Affective ties • Material interests – but purely material interests result in a relatively unstable situation • Ideal motives • Belief in legitimacy

  4. Ideal types of legitimate authority • Authority is defined by claim to legitimacy • Weber specified three types: • Rational-legalauthority: rests on a belief in the legality of enacted rules • Traditional authority: rests on the established belief in the sanctity of immemorial traditions • Charismatic authority: rests on the devotion to the exceptional sanctity, heroism or exemplary character of an individual person

  5. Legal Authority • Legal Authority rests on the acceptance of the following mutually interdependent ideas: • Any given legal norm may be established by agreement or by imposition, on grounds of expediency or value rationality or both, with a claim to obedience at least on the part of the members of the organization • Every legal norm consists essentially in a consistent system of abstract rules that have been intentionally established • The superior is subject to an impersonal order by orienting his actions to it in his own dispositions and commands • The person who obeys authority does so as a member of the organization and what he obeys is the only law • The person who obeys authority does not obey a person in authority as an individual, but rather as the superior of an impersonal order

  6. Traditional authority • The commands of a traditional authority are legitimized in one of two ways: • partly in terms of tradition • partly in term’s of the master’s discretion • So far as action follows principles at all, they’re things like ethical commonsense, equity, or utilitarian expediency • Not formal principles

  7. Charismatic authority • Charismatic authority depends on relationship between leader & followers • Recognition of charisma by subjects • Leadership must somehow benefit followers • Charismatic community forms and is animated by charismatic qualities of leader & followers • Charisma constitutes a “call,” “mission,” or “spiritual duty” • despises traditional or rational everyday economizing or seeking regular income thru continuous economic activity • Charisma has revolutionary force, it’s often transformative

  8. Routinization of charisma • By definition charismatic authority is exceptional, not an everyday thing • Charisma either fades away or becomes routinized • It cannot remain stable but must become traditionalized or rationalized or both • Motives behind the transformation: • Ideal and material interests of followers in the continuation of the community • Still stronger ideal and stronger material interests of staff, disciples, and party workers continuing relationship

  9. Has capitalism turned us all into rational actors out to maximize our material self-interest? • Does instrumental rationality accurately characterize most social action? • Does it even characterize our economic behavior? • Other motivations to consider?

  10. House of Sand and Fog (2003) • Storyline: An abandoned wife is evicted from her home and starts a tragic conflict with the house's new owners • The ‘American Dream’ gone awry

More Related