1 / 19

Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response

Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response . J.M. Siegford, G. Rucker, & A.J. Zanella Animal Behavior and Welfare Group Dept. Animal Science, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824. Introduction.

anisa
Download Presentation

Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effect of a Maze Task on Salivary Cortisol of Pigs at Weaning and on Subsequent Fear Response J.M. Siegford, G. Rucker, & A.J. Zanella Animal Behavior and Welfare Group Dept. Animal Science, Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824

  2. Introduction • Learning, memory and regulation of the stress response are mediated by the brain region known as the hippocampus. • Learning & memory: • e.g., Bannerman et al., 2002; Castro et al., 1989; Maaswinkel et al., 1997; Rosenzweig et al., 2003 • Stress: • e.g., Blank et al., 2002; Broom & Zanella, 2004; Dachir et al., 1993; Fuchs & Flugge, 2003; Kaiser et al., 2003; McEwen, 2001

  3. Enhancing coping responses in pigs • Biologically relevant hippocampal-dependent tasks may help integrate cognitive processes, encouraging development of an adaptive stress response. • Cooper & Cox, 2001 • Neonatal handling alone does not benefit pigs. • e.g., Weaver et al., 2000;

  4. Hypothesis • Performing hippocampal-dependent tasks may reduce stress-related physiological and behavioral consequences of early-weaning. Prediction • Piglets performing a maze task (MT) prior to weaning will show less stress at weaning, better ability to solve other spatial tasks, and lower subsequent fear responses.

  5. Study Design • Piglets from 4 litters divided into 3 treatment groups: • Hippocampal enhancement (HE, n=9) • Isolation control (IC, n=9) • Sow control (SC, n=9) • Trained and tested in MT from 5-11 days of age • Number of trials taken to learn maze and time taken to solve maze were recorded

  6. Study Design: Maze Task • 4x/day on days 5-11 • Max of 5 min/exposure and 10 min between exposures • Piglets trained in the maze by shaping

  7. Study Design • Piglets weaned by litter on day 12 • Piglets tested for spatial memory using a water maze task at 14 days of age • (Laughlin & Zanella, 2003) • Fear response of pigs examined using open field tests at 49-51 days of age

  8. Study Design: Water Maze • Spatial memory task on day 14 • 5 exposures separated by 10 min intervals • Maximum of 20s to solve the task • Exposure ends when pig locates and stands on platform • Latency to reach platform is recorded

  9. Study Design: Open Field chair • 3 open field (OF) tests over days 49-51 • OF1 = alone • OF2 = w/ball • OF3 = w/person • 5 min total • 1 min for acclimation • 4 min of testing ball Gate

  10. Study Design • Additional measures taken: • Weights taken daily until 21 days of age, then weekly until 49 days of age • Saliva collected before and after: the last MT, weaning, water maze, and open field tests

  11. Cortisol Levels at MT • Saliva was collected immediately before and after the MT on day 11 to measure cortisol * P = 0.04

  12. * * Cortisol Levels at Weaning P < 0.001

  13. Water Maze • Male IC pigs were slower to escape the maze than pigs of all other groups P = 0.07

  14. Fear Response at 50 days • Pigs spent less time in the center of the open field in OF1 compared to OF3 b a P < 0.001

  15. a b b Fear Response at 50 days • IC pigs spent more time in the periphery in OF1 than did IC or HE pigs in OF3 P = 0.03

  16. * Fear Response at 50 days • In OF3, HE touched the unfamiliar person more times than pigs in other groups P = 0.008

  17. Body Weights • No differences were seen in weights of piglets at weaning or up to 7 weeks of age (P > 0.05 in all cases)

  18. Implications • Handling alone was not responsible for changes seen in behavior • All animals were handled to a similar degree • MT may result in less fear of novel persons and places suggesting benefits of cognitive stimulation for young pigs. • MT did not negatively affect growth of pigs.

  19. Thank you • The MSU Swine Teaching and Research Center • Cheryl Leece • MSU McNair/SROP Program • USDA NRI #2001-2440 to A.J. Zanella funded this study

More Related