1 / 24

An Investigation into the Effects of n-type Doping in InAs Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors

An Investigation into the Effects of n-type Doping in InAs Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors. Steven P. Minor Group: Brandon Passmore, Jiang Wu, Dr. Manasreh, Vasyl Kunets, & Dr. Salamo Microelectronic-Photonics REU University of Arkansas July 25, 2007. Presentation Outline.

anoki
Download Presentation

An Investigation into the Effects of n-type Doping in InAs Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Investigation into the Effects of n-type Doping in InAs Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors Steven P. Minor Group: Brandon Passmore, Jiang Wu, Dr. Manasreh, Vasyl Kunets, & Dr. Salamo Microelectronic-Photonics REU University of Arkansas July 25, 2007

  2. Presentation Outline • Introduction to Quantum Dots Infrared Photodetectors (QDIPs), Interband and Intersubband Transitions • Experimental Design • Results • Conclusion • Acknowledgements

  3. Why are QDIPs important? • Two significant advantages over the one dimensionally confined Quantum Well Infrared Photodetector (QWIP) • Can operate at normal incident light due to the three dimensional carrier confinement. • Can operate at near room temperature due to high photoconductive gain and low noise.

  4. What’s a Quantum Dot? • Also known as artificial atoms. • Carriers are confined in three-dimensions. • An example would be InAs grown on GaAs.

  5. Interband Transition • Interband transitions occur when electrons in semiconductor materials absorb photons and are excited from the valence band to the conduction band.

  6. Intersubband Transitions • Intersubband transitions are optical excitations between the quantized energy levels within the conduction band of semiconductor heterostructures.

  7. Different types of Quantum Emission • Field-assisted tunneling occurs when electrons pass through a barrier in the presence of a high electric field. • Thermionic Emission is the flow of charged particles called thermions from a charged metal or a charged metal oxide surface, caused by thermal vibrational energy overcoming the electrostatic forces holding electrons to the surface.

  8. Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE)

  9. 300 nm n-GaAs: Si 2 x 1018 cm-3 50 nm GaAs Spacer 2 ML InAs QDs x10 50 nm GaAs Spacer 500 nm n-GaAs: Si 2 x 1018 cm-3 S.I. GaAs (100) Substrate Growth Objectives • Vary carrier concentrations in the Quantum Dots • Control Sample: Undoped • Dependent Samples: • 1 x 1017 cm-3 • 5 x 1017 cm-3 • 1 x 1018 cm-3

  10. Spin Coater (CEE-100)

  11. Mask Aligner (K.S.- MJB3)

  12. Electron Beam Evaporator (Edwards 306)

  13. Fabricated Devices

  14. Measurement Equipment • Doping Concentrations • Accent Electrochemical Capacitance-Voltage Pro • Photoluminescence • Bomem Fourier-transform Infrared Spectrometer • Current-Voltage • Keithley Semiconductor Characterization system • Photoresponse • Bruker Fourier-transform Infrared Spectrometer • Standford Research System low-noise preamplifier

  15. Results • ECV

  16. Results • Photoluminescence

  17. Results • Dark Current • Measured at 77 K

  18. Results • Photoresponse • Measured at 77 K.

  19. Results • Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)

  20. Results • Used a computer program to detect dots and calculate the average quantum dot density per cm2. • Averages • Dot Height: 5 nm • Lateral Diameter: 28 nm • Dot Density: 2.44 x 1010 cm-2

  21. Results • Optimal Photoresponse was observed from the sample in which the carrier concentration donated 2 electrons per dot.

  22. Conclusion • Introduced to graduate level research • Learned about nanostructures and infrared photodetectors • Experimentally verified previous research results

  23. Acknowledgements • Dr. Manasreh • Brandon Passmore • Jiang Wu • Vasyl Kunets • Eric Decuir • Dr. Salamo • Ken Vickers and Renee Hearon

  24. References • B. F. Levine, “Quantum well infrared photodetectors,” J. Appl. Phys.,vol. 74, p. R1, 1993. • M. O. Manasreh, Semiconductor Heterojunctions and Nanostructures. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005, ch. 10, pp. 457–528. • Shih-Yen LIN, Yao-Jen TSAI and Si-Chen LEE, “Effect of Silicon Dopant on the Performance of InAs/GaAs Quantum-Dot Infrared Photodetectors,” Japanese J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 43, No. 2A, 2004, pp. L 167–L 169 • J. Phillips, K. Kamath, X. Zhou, N. Chervela, and P. Bhattacharya, “Photoluminescence and far-infrared absorption in Si-doped self-organized InAs quantum dots,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(15), 13 October 1997. • A. D. Stiff-Roberts, X. H. Su, S. Chakrabarti, and P. Bhattacharya,” Contribution of Field-Assisted Tunneling Emission to Dark Current in InAs–GaAs Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors,” IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MARCH 2004. • Jie Liang, Ying Chao Chua, M. O. Manasreh, Euclydes Marega, Jr., and G. J. Salamo, “Broad-Band Photoresponse From InAs Quantum Dots Embedded Into InGaAs Graded Well,” IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS, VOL. 26, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2005.

More Related