1 / 28

Probing Dark Energy Birefringence by CMB polarization

Probing Dark Energy Birefringence by CMB polarization. Kin-Wang Ng ( 吳建宏 ) Institute of Physics & Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan IOP Mar 27, 2013. Collaborators: Guo-Chin Liu (TKU) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS)

anson
Download Presentation

Probing Dark Energy Birefringence by CMB polarization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Probing Dark Energy Birefringence by CMB polarization Kin-Wang Ng (吳建宏) Institute of Physics & Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan IOP Mar 27, 2013 Collaborators: Guo-Chin Liu (TKU) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Da-Shin Lee (NDHU) Wolung Lee (NTNU)

  2. The Hot Big Bang Model What is CDM? Weakly interacting but can gravitationally clump into halos What is DE??Inert, smooth, anti-gravity!!

  3. Do We Really Need Dark Energy

  4. SNAP satellite CMB /SNe /LSS Constraints on Physical State of Dark Energy Equation of State w = pDE / ρDE Sabaru LSST JDEM EUCLID

  5. Quadrupole anisotropy Thomson scattering e Linearly polarized CMB Anisotropy and Polarization • On large angular scales, matter imhomogeneities generate gravitational redshifts • On small angular scales, acoustic oscillations in plasma on last scattering surface generate Doppler shifts • Thomson scatterings with electrons generate polarization

  6. SKY MEASUREMENT RAW DATE MAPMAKING MULTI-FREQUENCY MAPS FOREGROUND REMOVAL CMB SKY MAP CMB Measurements • Point the telescope to the sky • Measure CMB Stokes parameters: T = TCMB−Tmean, Q = TEW – TNS, U = TSE-NW – TSW-NE • Scan the sky and make a sky map • Sky map contains CMB signal, system noise, and foreground contamination including polarized galactic and extra-galactic emissions • Remove foreground contamination by multi-frequency subtraction scheme • Obtain the CMB sky map

  7. Decompose the CMB sky into a sum of spherical harmonics: T(θ,φ) =Σlm alm Ylm (θ,φ) (Q − iU) (θ,φ) =Σlm a2,lm 2Ylm (θ,φ) q (Q + iU) (θ,φ) =Σlm a-2,lm -2Ylm (θ,φ) l = 180 degrees/ q CTl=Σm (a*lm alm) anisotropy power spectrum CEl=Σm (a*2,lm a2,lm+ a*2,lm a-2,lm ) E-polarization power spectrum CBl=Σm (a*2,lm a2,lm− a*2,lm a-2,lm) B-polarization power spectrum CTEl= −Σm (a*lm a2,lm) TE correlation power spectrum magnetic-type electric-type (Q,U) CMB Anisotropy and Polarization Angular Power Spectra

  8. Theoretical Predictions for CMB Power Spectra Boxes are predicted errors in future Planck mission • Solving the radiative transfer equation for photons with electron scatterings • Tracing the photons from the early ionized Universe through the last scattering surface to the present time • Anisotropy induced by metric perturbations • Polarization generated by photon-electron scatterings • Power spectra dependent on the cosmic evolution governed by cosmological parameters such as matter content, density fluctuations, gravitational waves, ionization history, Hubble constant, and etc. T TE E B [l(1+1) Cl/2p]1/2

  9. CMB Anisotropy CTl 2013

  10. CMB Polarization Power Spectra 2013

  11. Best-fit 6-parameter ΛCDM model 2013

  12. Beyond ΛCDM model Tensor/Scalar Ratio and Spectral Index 2013 ns=0.9675 and r < 0.11 (95% CL) r=Tensor/Scalar =Ph(k)/PR(k) at k0=0.05 Mpc-1

  13. Constant w w=w0+wa z/(1+z)

  14. Observational Constraints on Dark Energy • Smooth, anti-gravitating, only clustering on very large scales in some models • SNIa (z≤2): consistent with a CDM model • CMB (z≈1100): DE=0.70, constant w=−1.7+0.5/−0.3 (Planck 13+WMAP) • Combined all: DE=0.69, constant w=−1.13+0.13/−0.14 (Planck 13+WMAP+SNe) • A cosmological constant? Not Yet! Very weak constraint on dynamical DE with a time-varying w

  15. What is Dark Energy • DE physical state is measured indirectly through its gravitational effects on cosmological evolution, but what is the nature of DE? • It is hard to imagine a realistic laboratory search for DE • Is DE coupled to matter (cold dark matter or ordinary matter)? If so, then what would be the consequences?

  16. V(φ) DE as a Scalar Field kinetic energy K potential energy S= ∫d4x [f(φ) ∂μφ∂μφ/2 −V(φ)] • EOS w= p/ρ= ( K-V)/(K+V) Assume a spatially homogeneous scalar field φ(t) • f(φ)=1 → K=φ2/2→ -1 < w < 1quintessence • any f(φ)→ negative K→ w < -1phantom .

  17. A Coupling Dark Energy? • Weak equivalent principle (plus polarized body) =>Einstein gravity =>φFF (Ni 77) • Spontaneous breaking of a U(1) symmetry, like axion (Frieman et al. 95, Carroll 98) • DE coupled to cold dark matter to alleviate coincidence problem (Uzan 99, Amendola 00,..) • etc ~

  18. Affect the locations of CMB acoustic peaks Increase <w> Time-averaged <w>= -0.78 Time-varying Equation of State w(z)(Lee, Ng PRD 03) =0.7 =0.3 SNIa Redshift Last scattering surface

  19. DE Coupling to Electromagnetism Carroll, Field, Jackiw 90 This leads to photon dispersion relation ± left/right handed η conformal time then, a rotational speed of polarization plane

  20. magnetic-type electric-type β γ φ CMB photon TE spectrum Liu,Lee,Ng PRL 06 DE induced vacuum birefringence – Faraday rotation of CMB polarization

  21. Parity violating EB,TB cross power spectra

  22. Source term for polarization Radiative transfer equation μ=n·k, η: conformal time a: scale factor ne: e density σT: Thomson cross section Faraday rotation Rotation angle

  23. Power spectra g(η): radiative transfer function ST: source term for anisotropy SP=SP(0) r=η0 -η

  24. 2003 Flight of BOOMERANG Likelihood analysis assuming reasonable quintessence models <TB> c.l. M reduced Planck mass Constraining β by CMB polarization data More stringent limits from WMAP team and QUaD team ‘09

  25. Gravitational-wave B mode mimicked by late-time quintessence evoution (z<10) Future search for B mode Lensing B mode mimicked by early quintessence evolution CAUTION!Must check with TB and EB cross spectra

  26. Dark energy perturbation Including Dark Energy Perturbation time and space dependent rotation • Perturbation induced polarization power spectra in previous • quintessence models are small • Interestingly, in nearly ΛCDM models (no time evolution of • the mean field), birefringence generates <BB> while <TB>=<EB>=0

  27. Dark energy perturbation with w=-1 Lee,Liu,Ng 13 Birefringence generates <BB> while <TB>=<EB>=0 B mode B mode

  28. Summary • Future observations such as SNe, lensing, galaxy survey, CMB, etc. to measure w(z) at high-z or test Einstein gravity • However, it is also important to probe the nature of DE • DE coupled to cold dark matter => effects on CMB and matter power spectra, BAO • DE coupled to photon => time variation of the fine structure constant and creation of large-scale magnetic fields at z ~ 6 • Using CMB B-mode polarization to search for DE induced vacuum birefringence - Mean field time evolution → <BB>, <TB>, <EB> - Include DE perturbation→ <BB>, <TB>=<EB>=0 - This may confuse the searching for genuine B modes induced by gravitational lensing or primordial gravitational waves, so de-rotation is needed to remove vacuum birefringence effects Kamionkowski 09, Ng 10

More Related