1 / 16

Involving Disabled Users in the Development of e-Services

Involving Disabled Users in the Development of e-Services. Margita Lundman The Swedish Handicap Institute. User groups. Target group: approx. 10-20 % of the population in Europe Disability groups, e.g. people with visual impairments hearing impairments deafness

aowen
Download Presentation

Involving Disabled Users in the Development of e-Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Involving Disabled Users in the Development of e-Services Margita Lundman The Swedish Handicap Institute

  2. User groups • Target group: approx. 10-20 % of the population in Europe • Disability groups, e.g. people with • visual impairments • hearing impairments • deafness • speech and language impairments • motor impairments • cognitive impairments

  3. Using e-services • People with disabilities use e-services for the same reasons as everybody else • Potential problems using e-services: • Reading and writing • Using images • Perceiving sound based information • Handling input devices • Comprehension of complex, abstract information • Difficulties concentrating, navigating, locating information

  4. Design for All • Designing mainstream products and services to be accessible by as broad a range of users as possible • Accessible websites according to WAI Content Guidelines • a practical application of DfA

  5. Rationale for user involvement • Democracy • Influence and participation • Effectiveness, improved end results • Usable services, meeting user needs • Efficiency • Improved work process

  6. UN rules and conventions • UN Treaty to protect the Human Rights of disabled people, 2006 • Ensure access to information, communications and other services, including electronic services and emergency services. • UN Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, 1993 • Consultation of disabled users

  7. EU policies • EU Resolution on e-Accessibility, 2003 • Empower people with disabilities to take increased control • European Commmission i2010 eGovernment Action Plan, 2006 • No citizen left behind

  8. Bättre tillsammans - a project on user involvement • 2002-2006 • The Swedish Handicap Institute (SHI), User organisations and Centre for Speech Technology, CTT and Centre for User Oriented IT Design, CID, at KTH, Stockholm • The Swedish Inheritance Fund

  9. Goals • Strenghten the influence and participation of users with disabilities in the development and provision of ICT • A project on methods

  10. Project activities • Dialogues with users • Experiences, expectations, potentials of technology • A workshop methodology • Reality based video prototypes • Studies • Involving disabled users in research work • Involving disabled users in product development • Users as a resource; Involving people with learning disabilities • Studies related to children and young people • Master’s theses • Guidelines, how to facilitate user participation

  11. Methodology considerations • An approach • Professional, with respect, in an ethical manner • Preparations • Collecting information • Significant others • Elderly people

  12. Workshops • Westerlund & Lindquist, CID • Participants • People with neuropsychiatric disorders • Deaf, sign language users of 3G • Meaningful solutions based on users’ perceptions of everyday life • Simple means for visualizing scenarios • DVD, including ”video prototypes” and reports on the methodology

  13. Virtual focus groups • Henrik Ingrids, SHI and TEMO • Video conference via the Internet • Easy access, familiar environment • Two sessions • Young people with dyslexia • Deaf, sign language teenagers • Task oriented dialogue, less social interaction

  14. The video conference system

  15. Evaluation and dissemination • Project activities positively evaluated by the disabled participants • Results available, in Swedish, at the project website, www.hi.se • Ongoing dialogue on future products and services requested

  16. Dissemination of results, recipients • Actors developing ICT products and e-services • Researchers at universities • Students at design schools, technical universities, and programmes on human-computer interaction • Market study actors • Governmental authorities(user studies, procurement)

More Related