1 / 37

Pain in the ED: Is Low Dose Ketamine Effective?

Pain in the ED: Is Low Dose Ketamine Effective?. Alyssa Morris, R2 Grand Rounds May 14, 2009 . CASE. 45M MVC, brought in by EMS GCS 15, P= 96, BP= 100/62, O2 94% 2L NP Multiple orthopedic injuries CC of pain. Objectives. Briefly look at pain presentations in the ED

arella
Download Presentation

Pain in the ED: Is Low Dose Ketamine Effective?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pain in the ED:Is Low Dose Ketamine Effective? Alyssa Morris, R2 Grand Rounds May 14, 2009

  2. CASE • 45M MVC, brought in by EMS • GCS 15, P= 96, BP= 100/62, O2 94% 2L NP • Multiple orthopedic injuries • CC of pain

  3. Objectives • Briefly look at pain presentations in the ED • How well do we manage patient pain • Ketamine as an analgesic • Pharmacology of its analgesic properties • Evidence for its analgesic effectiveness • Mostly anesthesia literature • Evidence in ED population • Discuss if this is an option in our ED

  4. Pain In ED • Pain is most common reason for ED use • Accounts for up to 78% of visits to EDs • Underuse of analgesia is well documented • “oligoanalgesia” • Many of our patients leave still in pain • Studies show that we have not improved in satisfactorily treating pain in the ED

  5. Pain In ED- How well do we do? Journal of Pain. 2007;8(6):460-466 • Prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study of 842 pts in US and Canada • 60% were given analgesics • Median wait time for administration was 90 min • 41% of pts pain rating did not change during ED visit • 74% d/c in moderate to severe pain

  6. Pain Control • IV Meds • Fentanyl • Morphine • PO Meds • Tylenol • Ibuprofen • Toradol • Percocet • Morphine • Local anesthetics

  7. Ducharme’s Approach Ketamine • 0.3 mg/kg IV bolus over 10 min • 0.2-0.3 mg/kg/hr infusion

  8. Ketamine- Background • Derived from street drug PCP in 1962 • Been used in clinical practice since 1970s • First used as an anesthetic agent, especially in pediatric population • Became recognized as an analgesic when NMDA R was found to be important in pain response

  9. Ketamine- Effects • Sedation and amnesia • Analgesia (local and systemic) • Cardiac hemodynamically stable agent • +inotropy and chronotropy • Respiratory reflexes usually well preserved • Bronchodilation and increased pulmonary compliance

  10. Ketamine- Adverse Effects • Emesis • Salivary and tracheobronchial secretions • Increase in muscular tone • Emergence rxn • Transient laryngospasm • Respiratory depression

  11. Ketamine- Contraindications ABSOLUTE RELATIVE <12m old Procedures involving stimulation of the posterior pharynx Known or suspected CAD Glaucoma or acute globe injury Uncontrolled HTN Lesions assoc w high ICP • <3m old • Known or suspected psychosis

  12. Ketamine- Pharmacology • Highly lipid soluble • Crosses BBB quickly • Rapid onset of action and recovery • Peak concentration: 1min w IV, 5min w IM • Recover to baseline fxn: 15-30m w IV, 30-90 w IM • Hepatic metabolism • At >1mg/kg = dissociative agent, 0.1-0.5mg/kg = analgesic

  13. Ketamine- MOA • Noncompetitive antagonist of CNS NMDA Receptor • Usually excited by neurotransmitter glutamate • Involved in sensory input at the spinal, thalamic, limbic and cortical levels • Agonist at α and β-adrenergic receptor • Antagonist at muscarinic receptor of the CNS • Blocks reuptake of catecholamines • Agonist at opioid μ and Σ Receptor

  14. Ketamine Anesthesia • Not fully understood and is very complex • Creates a dissociation b/t the cortical and limbic systems • Sensory associative areas of cortex, limbic system and thalamus are directly depressed by ketamine • Higher CNS centers unable to receive or process sensory info • Emotional significance cannot be assessed • Results are anesthesia, analgesia, suppression of fear and anxiety, amnesia

  15. NMDA R and Pain • Pain is detected by 2 types of peripheral nociceptive neurons • A-delta nociceptors • C-fiber nociceptors • Prolonged firing of C-fiber nociceptors causes release of glutamate which activates NMDA R in spinal cord • spinal cord neurons become more responsive to all of its inputs • Hyperexcitable dorsal root ganglion • Wind-up phenomenon • Pain memory • Decreases neuronal sensitivity to opioid receptor agonists • Tolerance can develop

  16. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:362-5 • Prospective, convenience cohort • Quantify analgesic effect of a dose of o.1mg/kg IV morphine bolus is ED pts with acute, severe pain • Outcome: %pts whose pain decreased by >50% in 30 min • Results: • N-119 • 67% did not have a 50% reduction in pain

  17. Anesthesiology 2004;100:292-301 Objective: measure the analgesic effect of ketamine with use of MRI • 8 volunteers received noxious thermal and auditory stimuli and then given approx 0.5mg/kg of ketamine and brain areas mapped with MRI • Results: sig reduced pain scores with matched decrease in activity in brain • Concluded that ketamine analgesia occurs thru lower cortical processing in pain-related regions of brain

  18. Anesth Analg 2005;100:169-74. • ASA I/II, age 18-65, major elective open abdo, uro or ortho Sx • Randomized, double-blinded, to receive morphine 3mg Q5m until pain VRS <2 and either placebo (N/S) or Ketamine 10mg IV • End-pt: morphine consumption and time to effective analgesia (VRS<2) and time to return of pain (VRS>2)

  19. Conclusions • Low-Dose bolus of Ketamine improves effects of morphine • 40% Less opiate needed • Less time to analgesic effect • Less analgesic failures • No difference in adverse events

  20. Anest Analg 2003;96:789-95. • RDBCT • ASA I, II, III for abdo, ortho or thoracic Sx • End points: morphine consumption and time to effective analgesia using VAS • Received a bolus of 0.1mg/kg morphine IV • Then allowed 0.03mg/kg boluses of morphine (max of three) • Randomized to saline or ketamine 0.25mg/kg bolus

  21. Conclusions • Low-dose Ketamine bolus decreased the morphine consumption • Low-dose Ketamine decreased the time to effective analgesia • Low-dose ketamine group had better respiratory status and returned to baseline more quickly • Morphine alone group had more adverse events and took much longer to return to baseline hemodynamics

  22. Anesth Analg 2003;97:843-7. • RDBCT of pts needing abdo surgery • Outcome: consumption of morphine and VAS scores • Intervention: morphine boluses until VAS<30 then randomized to either morphine PCA (1mg w 7min lock out) and placebo or ketamine bolus of 0.5mg/kg then 0.12mg/kg/hr infusion

  23. Conclusion • Low dose bolus and then infusion of Ketamine reduces morphine consumption • No difference in VAS pain scores • No difference in side effects

  24. AJEM. 2007;25:385-390. • Prospective, multicenter, RDBCT • Objective: compare ketamine plus morphine to morphine alone • 0.1mg/kg of morphine IV, followed by 3mg Q5min until pain relief obtained (VAS<30/100) • +/- 0.2mg/kg Ketamine IV over 10 mins • Outcomes: morphine consumption and VAS at 30 mins

  25. Inclusion: • Trauma pts with VAS>60/100 • 18-70y.o • SBP>90, GCS 15, no resp distress • Exclusion: • Pts with psych hx • Renal/hepatic/resp failure • Chronic pain pts treated with opioids • N= 73; K=38, P= 35

  26. Conclusion • Ketamine reduced morphine consumption • No difference in hemodynamics • Generalizable to only some of our trauma patients as some are HD unstable • Not enough to change practice, but gives us another option to think about

  27. Summary • Pain is one of the most common ED presentations • Pain is inadequately managed in the ED • Low-dose Ketamine has been shown to be an effective and safe adjunct for pain control • Need more evidence

More Related