1 / 57

Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods

Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods. Jianhua Yue, Yue Wang, Gerard Schuster University of Utah. Problem: Ground Roll Degrades Signal. Reflections. Ground Roll. Offset (ft). 2000. 3500. 0. Time (sec). 2.5. PP Reflections. Converted S Waves.

arkadiy
Download Presentation

Overview of Some Coherent Noise Filtering Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of SomeCoherent Noise Filtering Methods Jianhua Yue, Yue Wang, Gerard Schuster University of Utah

  2. Problem: Ground Roll Degrades Signal Reflections Ground Roll Offset (ft) 2000 3500 0 Time (sec) 2.5

  3. PP Reflections Converted S Waves Problem: PS Waves Degrade Signal 0 Time (sec) 4.0

  4. Problem: Tubes Waves Obscure PP 2000 Depth (ft) 3100 0 Reflections Reflections Time (sec) Time (s) Aliased tube waves Converted S Waves 0.14 4.0

  5. Outline • Radon Filtering Methods • ARCO Field Data Results • Saudi Land Data • Multicomponent Data Example • Conclusion and Discussion

  6. Model Noise and Adaptive Subtraction Filter that Exploit Moveout Differences Two Classes of Coherent Noise Filtering

  7. F-K Dip Filtering Filtering in  - p domain linear  - p parabolic  - p hyperbolic  - p local+adaptive subtraction Least Squares Migration Filter Filtering Methods: Moveout Separation

  8. SIGNAL SIGNAL NOISE Overlap Signal & Noise NOISE Separation Principle: Exploit Differences in Moveout & Part. Velocity Directions Transform Frequency Time Wavenumber Distance

  9. Tau-P Transform Sum Transform Tau Time V=1/P Distance

  10. Tau-P Transform Transform Tau Time V=1/P Distance

  11. Mute Noise Transform Tau-P Transform Tau Time V=1/P Distance

  12. Problem: Indistinct Separation Signal/Noise Tau-P Transform Transform Tau Time V=1/P Distance

  13. Distinct Separation Signal/Noise Hi res. Hyperbolic Transform Tau-P Transform Transform Tau Time V=1/P Distance

  14. Breakdown of Hyperbolic Assumption Irregular Moveout * v v v v v v v v v Time Distance

  15. d = L m +L m Invert for m & m Kirchhoff Modeler s p s s P-reflectivity d = L m p p S-Refl. Kirchhoff Modeler Filtering by LSMF d PP Time PS Distance

  16. d = L m +L m s s 1. p p data unknowns 2. Find m by conjugate gradient p d = L m 3. Model Coherent Signal p p LSMF Method

  17. Outline • Radon Filtering Methods • ARCO Surface Wave Data • Saudi Land Data: Local Adapt.+Subt. • Multicomponent Data Example • Conclusion and Discussion

  18. RAW DATA OF ARCO X (kft) 1.8 3.6 0 Time (s) 2.5 Raw Data

  19. X (kft) X (kft) FK LSMF ARCO DATA 1.8 3.6 1.8 3.6 0 A A Time (s) B B 2.5

  20. ZOOM VIEW OF WINDOW “ A” X (kft) X (kft) 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 0.5 Time (s) 1.5 FK LSMF

  21. ZOOM VIEW OF WINDOW “ B” X (kft) X (kft) 2.0 3.45 2.0 3.45 1.5 Time (s) 2.5 FK LSMF

  22. Outline • Radon Filtering Methods • ARCO Surface Wave Data • Saudi Land Data: Local Adapt.+Subt. • Multicomponent Data Example • Conclusion and Discussion

  23. Local tau-p Aramco Saudi Land Data 0.0s 4.0s

  24. S N + Tau-p ~ ~ S N + -1 Tau-p Adaptive Subtraction = S N N S + -

  25. INPUT LOCAL TAU-P 0.0s Input After Noise Reduction 4.0s (courtesy Yi Luo @ Aramco)

  26. Input FK Signal FK F F K K

  27. Outline • Radon Filtering Methods • ARCO/Saudi Field Data Results • Multicomponent Data Example • Graben Example • Mahagony Example • Conclusion and Discussion

  28. Graben Velocity Model X (m) 0 5000 0 V1=2000 m/s V2=2700 m/s V3=3800 m/s Depth (m) V4=4000 m/s V5=4500 m/s 3000

  29. PP1 Leak PP1 PP2 PP2 Leak PP3 Leak PP3 PP4 PP4 Leak Synthetic Data Offset (m) Offset (m) 5000 0 5000 0 0 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

  30. PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 LSMF Separation 5000 0 Offset (m) 5000 0 Offset (m) 0 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

  31. PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 True P-P and P-SV Reflection 5000 0 Offset (m) 5000 0 Offset (m) 0 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

  32. PP1 Leak PP1 PP2 Leak PP2 PP3 PP3 Leak PP4 Leak PP4 F-K Filtering Separation 5000 0 Offset (m) 5000 0 Offset (m) 0 Time (s) 1.4 Horizontal Component Vertical Component

  33. Outline • Radon Filtering Methods • ARCO/Saudi Field Data Results • Multicomponent Data Example • Graben Example • Mahagony Field Data • Conclusion and Discussion

  34. PS PS PS CRG1 Raw Data 0 Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

  35. PS PS PS CRG1 Data after Using F-K Filtering 0 Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

  36. PS PS PS CRG1 Data after Using LSMF 0 Time (s) 4 CRG1 (Vertical component)

  37. Filtering signal/noise using: moveout difference & particle velocity direction Don’t use a shotgun to kill a fly Conclusions Local tau-p and adaptive subtraction LSMF computes moveout and particle velocity direction based on true physics.

  38. Simple Filtering YES YES YES YES Complex Filtering No YES/No YES/no YES User Intervention Mild Yes Yes Yes Cost c $ $ $$$$ Proven YES YES YES Yes/No SUMMARY FK Linear Tau-P Parabolic Tau-P LSMF

  39. SAUDI DATA X(m) 88 2988 0 Time (s) 4.0 Raw Data

  40. SAUDI DATA AFTER FK & LSMF X(m) X (m) 88 2988 88 2988 0 A A B B Time (s) 4.0 FK LSMF

  41. CRG2 Data after Using F-K Filtering (vertical component) 0 Time (s) 4 CRG2 (Vertical component)

  42. CRG2 Data after Using LSMF (vertical component) 0 Time (s) 4 CRG2 (Vertical component)

  43. ZOOM VIEW OF WINDOW A X (m) X (m) 890 2088 890 2088 1.0 Time (s) 2.0 FK LSMF

  44. ZOOM VIEW OF WINDOW B X (m) X (m) 186 1189 186 1189 0.7 Time (s) 2.0 FK LSMF

  45. SAUDI DATA X(m) 88 2089 0 Time (s) 4.0 Raw Data

  46. SAUDI DATA AFTER FK & LSMF X(m) X (m) 88 2089 88 2089 0 A A B B Time (s) 4.0 FK LSMF

  47. ZOOM VIEW OF WINDOW “A” X (m) X (m) 327 1370 327 1370 0.6 Time (s) 2.0 FK LSMF

  48. ZOOM VIEW OF WINDOW “B” X (m) X (m) 186 621 186 621 0.4 Time (s) 1.4 FK LSMF

  49. Overview of SomeCoherent Noise Filtering Merthods Overview There are a number of different coherent noise filtering methods, including FK dip filter, Radon transform, hyperbolic transform, and parabolic transform methods. All of these methods rely upon transforming the signal into a new domain where the signal and noise are more separable. We will show that LSM filtering is another coherent filtering method, but is more precise in defining a transform that separates signal and coherent noise according to the physics of wave propagation. Examples show that this is sometimes a more effective ilter, but it is more costly.

  50. Multicomponent Filtering by LSMF PP d = L m +L m PS p p x s s d = L m +L m p p z s s PS PP Time Z Distance

More Related