1 / 9

The image, science, & impact of the behavioral sciences: Can we do better in the next 10 years?

The image, science, & impact of the behavioral sciences: Can we do better in the next 10 years?. ************************ Barb Wanchisen, Executive Director The Federation of Behavioral, Psychological, & Cognitive Sciences ***********************. 22 Member Societies.

arnie
Download Presentation

The image, science, & impact of the behavioral sciences: Can we do better in the next 10 years?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The image, science, & impact of the behavioral sciences: Can we do better in the next 10 years? ************************ Barb Wanchisen, Executive Director The Federation of Behavioral, Psychological, & Cognitive Sciences ***********************

  2. 22 Member Societies • Society for Computers in Psychology • Society of Experimental Social Psychology • Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology • Society for Judgment and Decision Making • Society for Mathematical Psychology • Society of Multivariate Experimental Psychology • Society for Personality and Social Psychology • Society for Psychophysiological Research • Society for Research in Psychopathology • American Educational Research Association • American Psychological Association • Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback • Association for Behavior Analysis • Behavioral Genetics Association • Cognitive Science Society • Human Factors and Ergonomics Society • International Behavioral Neuroscience Society • International Society for Developmental Psychobiology • Massachusetts Neuropsychological Society • National Academy of Neuropsychology • Psychonomic Society • Society for Behavioral • Neuroendocrinology

  3. What are the behavioral sciences to “us” versus “them”? • “Social/Behavioral” is one word in DC and covers many disciplines with a diversity of approach and methodology – we are all lumped together for good or for worse • Within just Psychology, we are a many-headed hydra, maybe pre-paradigmatic, and many of us don’t like to be called “psychologist” – note the long name of the Federation for one thing!

  4. How are the behavioral sciences perceived in DC? • Overall: “Soft” science; a first area to cut in financially-tough times • “Some of this science is good, but hasn’t all the important stuff been done?” • “Can’t you determine a quantifiable goal to reach in say 10 years?” • “You should focus on consistent methodologies.” • Will we always be perceived as the “weakest” of the sciences?

  5. Science in DC funding circles • Legislators, at various points in 20th century, have been interested in social issues like war and poverty and wanted us to get funding • “Natural” science is viewed as both qualitatively different from social sciences & the exact opposite: that both are science, just with different topics of concern (more controversial in social science) • NSF was born in 1950 without us: soon a few studies of ours was funded there • In the 1960’s, hearings were held on establishing a possible NFSS (or NSSF)

  6. National Foundation for Social Sciences? “Footnote 11. The actual distribution of the fifty-three witnesses who testified at a 1967 hearing was tallied up this way in a congressional staff study: No attitude expressed about an NFSS 12 In favor of its creation 14 Opposed to its creation 20 Unclear, undecided, equivocal 5 Unclassifiable position 2 (Senate Committee on Government Operations, Subcommittee on Research and Technical Programs, Staff Study: The Use of Social Research in Federal Domestic Programs, part 4, “Current Issues in the Administration of Federal Social Research,” April 1967, 6).” - Gieryn, T. F. (1999) Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.

  7. Working for a more unified approach, or at least a “faux” unified approach? • . • Maybe Dr. Phil isn’t to blame for everything… • Change begins at home: for me, the advocacy/association community • Science itself: even just within “psychological science” maybe we can identify a name we all want to be called …but there are other bigger issues • Media’s view: you can sometimes get as many opinions as there are social/behavioral scientists when asked a question • Greater unification may serve us well: we need infrastructure for it

  8. Suggested reading . Gieryn, T. F. (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

  9. THE END! Looking forward to some good dialogue!

More Related