1 / 14

Battery storage system for offshore windfarm

Battery storage system for offshore windfarm. S ae thor Asgeirsson Mateusz Kluska Jure Vetrsek. Akureyri , 1 9 .6.2009. Table of content. Site with description Wind resources and utilization Load modelling Intermittency issues Battery design Conclusions.

aulii
Download Presentation

Battery storage system for offshore windfarm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Battery storage system for offshore windfarm SaethorAsgeirsson Mateusz Kluska Jure Vetrsek Akureyri, 19.6.2009

  2. Table of content • Site with description • Wind resources and utilization • Load modelling • Intermittency issues • Battery design • Conclusions

  3. Wind resources and utilization • System location: Cleveland • 5 wind turbines (each 2MW) connected to grid and battery bank • Average wind velocity 8,08 m/s Power curve

  4. Households hourly load modelling • Small community with 1000 households • Average hourly load per household 2,88 kW Average hourly electricity load for a day in most critical month

  5. Problem • How to meet energy needs, when there is not enought energy from wind turbines?

  6. Problem

  7. Battery bank properties Battery stack performance

  8. Battery design • Nominal capacity23,993kWh. • Autonomy5.03hr. • 9 % capacity shortage.

  9. Battery

  10. Hourly battery state of charge

  11. Battery storage advantages • Grid parallel configuration • High system efficiency • Low maintenance • Low noise • Zero emission • Long lifetime <4500 cycles

  12. Conclusions • We were not modelling costs. • We designed our batteries to cover basic load during summer time - low production from wind turbines. • Peak power was provided by the grid. • Excess power was sold to the grid. • In general, if connection to the grid is available, one does not use batteries.

  13. References • Battery energy storage technology for power systems—An overview, K.C. Divya, Jacob Østergaard, Electric Power Systems Research 79 (2009) 511–520 • Water Quality Modeling: Decision Support Techniques for Lakes and Reservoirs, Volume IV Brian Henderson-Sellers, Richard H. French, Steve C. McCutcheon Edition: illustrated Page 37 • http://navigator.awstruewind.com/ • http://www.smallwindenergy.ca/en/Overview/CaseStudies/OffGrid.html • http://www.enernoc.com/enerblog/big-batteries/ • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium-sulfur_battery • http://www.wirefreedirect.com/battery_sizing.asp • http://navigator.awstruewind.com/ • Cleveland Wind Project http://blog.cleveland.com/business/2008/09/first_studies_encouraging_on_l.html • HOMER – The Micropower Optimization Model Software by NREL

  14. Questions?

More Related