1 / 20

Bullying, Cyberbullying and Sexting

Bullying, Cyberbullying and Sexting . Eric G. Rodriguez & Maxine Longoria-Nash. Bullying. Take a deep breath. OCR: Bullying is often “discriminatory treatment” Do more than just discipline School is responsible for WHAT IT KNOWS or SHOULD HAVE KNOW

avak
Download Presentation

Bullying, Cyberbullying and Sexting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bullying, Cyberbullying and Sexting Eric G. Rodriguez & Maxine Longoria-Nash

  2. Bullying. Take a deep breath. • OCR: Bullying is often “discriminatory treatment” • Do more than just discipline • School is responsible for WHAT IT KNOWS or SHOULD HAVE KNOW • Label used to describe incident doesn’t matter as much as the nature of the conduct itself • What are you doing PROACTIVELY about bullying? • Who is your 504 Coordinator? • You are “responsible employees”

  3. Bullying • Expression: written, verbal, and through electronic means • Physical conduct • That occurs on school property, school sponsored or school related activities, or in a vehicle operated by the district • Physical harm, damage to property • Severe, persistent, or pervasive = intimidating, threatening or abusive educational environment

  4. Changes in Bullying law • Bullying: • exploits an imbalance of power between the student perpetrator and the student victim through written or verbal expression or physical conduct; and • interferes with a student’s education or substantially disrupts the operation of a school. • Cyberbullying, internet conduct, and texting are now included • Board may transfer victim OR bully • Staff development must include preventing, identifying, responding to, and reporting incidents of bullying • Boards must adopt certain policies, and the procedures for reporting bullying must be posted on your website

  5. Exhale. • Bullying: • exploits an imbalance of power between the student perpetrator and the student victim through written or verbal expression or physical conduct; and • interferes with a student’s education or substantially disrupts the operation of a school.

  6. What to do. • Take any report of bullying to the campus administrator or designee • Campus principal or designee reduces any oral complaint of bullying into writing • Investigate any report of bullying • Take interim steps to prevent bullying during investigation • Prepare a written report of investigation • Complete and send report to Superintendent or designee within 10 District business days

  7. If bullying occurred? • Take appropriate disciplinary or corrective action • Address misconduct consistent with student code of conduct • Corrective action may include counseling, extra monitoring and supervision, and/or other supports or interventions • Transfer (of victim or bully) to another classroom or campus • What if bullying occurred on bus or during extracurricular activities?

  8. Special Ed Considerations • No discipline until ARD committee has reviewed the conduct • If transferring a student in special education to another classroom or campus, this is likely a change of placement (and a discipline consequence) requiring ARD meeting

  9. Cyberbullying • No legal definition in Texas • Generally, any behavior or act of bullying that is conducted through some form of technology • Sending or posting harmful material • Other forms of social aggression using the Internet • Can occur any time, any place, and with anonymity

  10. School PropertyAcceptable Use Policy • Require students to sign AUP • Use of District technology is a privilege • Used for authorized purposes only • No right to privacy • Random monitoring of equipment • Can’t use it to harass, threaten, or intimidate others • Can’t use it to share, view or transfer unlawful, obscene or sexually-related content

  11. Student’s Personal Property • Probably not wise to ban all cell phones from school • Develop practical and defensible rules • Thorny issues related to possession or use of cell phones, including recording of voice or images • Make sure the options, and consequences, are clear

  12. Sexting • Texas Penal Code 43.26 • Knowing/intentional possession of • Visual material of child (under 18 at time image taken) engaging in sexual conduct • Person knows that material depicts the child • Find this on a student’s phone: • Don’t transmit it, or return it • Don’t delete it • Confiscate and secure it

  13. Sexting, cont. • Misdemeanor offense • Refers to “promoting” through electronic means from one minor to another, visual material depicting a minor engaging in “sexual conduct.” • Also prohibits possession of such material • But, not necessarily required to report possession of child pornography as a report of child abuse…

  14. Use of Technology Away from School • First Amendment – freedom of speech/expression dilemma • Does the school have a legitimate interest in regulating student behavior away from school? • Courts apply one of the “tests” that the U.S. Supreme Court has approved

  15. Tinker Test • Presumption that student expression is constitutionally protected • Unless school administrators can reasonably forecast a material and substantial disruption of school • Unspoken factor: severity of punishment • Public ridicule and hard feelings not enough • See O.Z. case (School wins, pg. 22), and compare with Layshock case (Student wins, pg. 19)

  16. Fraser Test • Expression at school/school activities that is lewd, sexually explicit, or vulgar is not protected • If it occurs away from school, then the school must show that the conduct was directly targeted or aimed at school activities • See Requa case (School wins, pg. 19)

  17. Bong Hits Test • Student expression that advocates illegal drug use is not protected • See Ponce case (School wins, pg. 20)

  18. Ponce Test • Student expression advocating demonstrably grave harm to the physical safety of students at school is not constitutionally protected. • See Ponce case (School wins, pg. 20)

  19. Public Ridicule Not Enough • Students win: • Comments are critical, vulgar, offensive, demeaning and personal… • School wins: • Comments include depictions of violence or threats; and student sexual harassment of school official

  20. Thank you! Eric G. Rodriguez Maxine Longoria-Nash Walsh Anderson erodriguez@wabsa.com mnash@wabsa.com

More Related