1 / 28

Policy-Making and Implementation: English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21 st Century

Policy-Making and Implementation: English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21 st Century. National Conference on Student Assessment June 25, 2014. English Language Proficiency Reexamined. ELPA21 Overview Evolution of Standards & Assessments for ELLs State of the Lead State: Oregon

avak
Download Presentation

Policy-Making and Implementation: English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21 st Century

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Policy-Making and Implementation: English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century National Conference on Student Assessment June 25, 2014

  2. English Language Proficiency Reexamined ELPA21 Overview Evolution of Standards & Assessments for ELLs State of the Lead State: Oregon State and Federal Policy: Implications for Implementation

  3. ELPA21 Overview Margaret Ho (WA), English Language Proficiency Assessment Coordinator and Former ELPA21 Chairperson

  4. Project Overview • Awarded $6.3 million four-year Enhanced Assessment Grant, September 2012 • 11 participating states • Fiscal Agent: Oregon Department of Education • Project Management Partner: Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) • Collaborative Partners: • Understanding Language Initiative (Stanford University) • National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) of the University of California, Los Angeles • National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) of the University of Minnesota

  5. ELPA21 Consortium States

  6. Assessment System Features • Comprehensive online delivery • Innovative Technology Enhanced Items (See our session on Innovative Items on Thursday 9-10 a.m.) • Cohesive system to integrate with existing district policies and enhance the student’s experience through strong engagement, and minimal testing time • High-quality communications for the states’ adaptation for constituents and high quality resources for professional development • Sustainability to respond to states’ need for valid and reliable assessment, maximize information, and minimize cost

  7. System Timeline • Item bank development (ongoing) • Contrasting Groups Study, Jan. 2015 • User Acceptability Testing, Jan. 2015 • Field Test, Feb./Mar. 2015 • Operational Summative Test, SY 2015-2016 • Screener, SY 2016-2017

  8. Evolution of Standards & Assessments for ELLs Kenji Hakuta, Director of the Understanding Language Initiative at Stanford University & Principal Investigator for ELPA21

  9. The Cyclops Problem

  10. New Paradigm Discourse Text (complex text) Explanation Argumentation Purpose Typical structure of text Sentence structures Vocabulary practices Content Language

  11. ELP Standards: When ELLs use language effectively as they progress toward independent participation in grade-appropriate activities to attain college and career readiness, they can….

  12. State of the Lead State: Oregon David Bautista, Assistant Superintendent Education Equity Unit

  13. New ELP Standards & ELP Assessment • States are benefiting from the research, expertise, and education theories of our partners while our partners are learning from practitioners and on-the-ground implementation • ELPA21 Consortium Approach Leads to a Common ELP Assessment and ELP Standards as well as Shared Learning, Ownership, and Resources • Professional development • Online Curriculum Resources • Including Massive Open Online Course(s) (MOOC) • Item Development

  14. But, How Will ODE Support? • House Bill 3232 - Strategic Investment Funding • ELP Standards Professional Learning Grant • ELP Standards Work Group • MOOC Karen Thompson (Oregon State University) & Kenji Hakuta (Stanford University, Understanding Language) • Additional ODE Supports • Technical assistance visits, web meetings • Communicate WestEd/CCSSO web-based supports • Connect to practice through E-Newsletter

  15. ELP Standards Professional Learning Grant • Grant Eligibility • Non-Competitive grant awarded to districts that meet the following criteria based on 2012-2013 LEP Collection data: • The ELL population of the district exceeds 500 total. • The student population is comprised of 15% or more ELLs. • 34 districts meet these criteria • PD Grant funding distributes $8.50 p/ELL • 48,000 total students

  16. ELP Standards Professional Learning Grant Recipients by district

  17. Project Timeline • PLT 1 – April, 2014 • Focus on shifts • Deepen understanding of new ELP Standards • PLT 2 – June, 2014 • Planning for ’14-’15 district-specific professional learning • Plan Plan • MOOC – October, 2014 • PLT • School-based PLCs • PLT 3 – October, 2014 • Unit plan design • Finalize professional learning plans • Professional Learning Design • PLT 4 – February, 2015 • Finalize ELP-aligned Unit • Pilot • Pilot Pilot • PLT 5 – April, 2015 • Share for feedback • Reflect and revise • Reflect & Revise • PLT 6 – June, 2015 • Present & post • Share achievements in professional learning

  18. Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) • In addition to the PLT Conferences and the ELP Standards Work Group, ODE is working with Kenji Hakuta of Stanford’s Understanding Language and Karen Thompson from Oregon State University to design a MOOC to further our collective understanding and experience with the ELP Standards.

  19. The View from Here (Oregon) - State and Federal Policy: Implications for Implementation Doug Kosty, Assistant Superintendent

  20. Policy Implications for using new generation ELP assessments • Increasing guidance, support, and resources for educators to teach to the new standards • Recognize the impact on current and former ELLs who have been instructed and demonstrated growth based on previous ELP standards • The impact of college and career ready ELP standards on AMAOs • Ongoing growth and sustainability of consortia • State policies differ in the criteria used to to screen and determine growth and proficiency

  21. ELPA21 Governance Overview • Consortium Council • Membership: One representative from each member state appointed by the state’s education chief • Duties: Determines the broad picture and general scope of the ELPA21 system, makes policy recommendations, initial contact for expenditure of funds. • Executive Board • Membership: One representative from Oregon, plus five at-large representatives from member states elected by the Consortium Council • Duties: Final voice and decision-making entity on all issues and recommendations from the Consortium Council, coordinates policy formulation, and signs off on all major deliverables. • Task Management Teams

  22. ELPA21 Decision-Making

  23. Communications with USED • Monthly Meetings • Includes subset of Executive Board and as necessary reps from CCSSO, CRESST, & Understanding Language • Focus on Terms, Conditions, and Timeline

  24. David Bautista, Assistant Superintendent Education Equity Unit Oregon Department of Education david.bautista@state.or.us Kenji Hakuta, Lee L. Jacks Professor of Education Stanford University Principal Investigator for ELPA21 hakuta@stanford.edu Margaret Ho, WELPA Coordinator Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction ELPA 21 Former Executive Board Chair margaret.ho@k12.wa.us Doug Kosty, Assistant Superintendent Instruction, Standards, Assessment and Accountability Unit Oregon Department of Education doug.kosty@state.or.us Questions?

  25. Visit ELPA21.org for more information The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal government.

More Related