1 / 21

Evaluating a multi-media based tool for self-learning geographical information

Evaluating a multi-media based tool for self-learning geographical information. Dr Francisco Escobar RMIT University Isaac Franc é s University of Alcal á , Spain Assoc Professor Ian Bishop Dr Andre Zerger The University of Melbourne. Overview. Background What’s GIS?

awen
Download Presentation

Evaluating a multi-media based tool for self-learning geographical information

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating a multi-media based tool for self-learning geographical information Dr Francisco Escobar RMIT University Isaac Francés University of Alcalá , Spain Assoc Professor Ian Bishop Dr Andre Zerger The University of Melbourne

  2. Overview • Background • What’s GIS? • Multimedia and GIS learning • GISWEB implementation process • Evaluation • Conclusion

  3. Background • 1999 Priming grant, $6,000 – University of Melbourne • 2000 T&L(M&ET) project grant - University of Melbourne • Evaluation project – University of Alcala de Henares, Spain. 2001-2002

  4. What’s GIS? A computerised system to capture, store, update, manipulate, analyse and display geographically referenced information (ESRI)

  5. Multimedia and GIS learning • Suitability for multimedia: • New discipline • Spatially dynamic concepts • Algorithms shielded by GIS software • Multiple disciplines / backgrounds

  6. Multimedia and GIS learning • Pioneers: • GISTutor: Birbeck College London • ESRI Virtual Campus • Our approach: • Latest technology and WWW • Full interactivity • Free access • Generic approach (not software based)

  7. Multimedia and GIS learning • Our expectations: • In-lecture tool • Improved: • Access to learning • Productivity • Quality of student learning • Student attitudes to learning

  8. GISWEB: implementation process • Involvement of all GIS lecturers in Geomatics, The University of Melbourne • Students’ contribution • Web designer • Software development: • Macromedia director, Dreamweaver, Flash • Shockwave animations • HTML and Java Scripts • An Internet browser is the interface

  9. www.geom.unimelb.edu.au/giswebContent • Background on MM-University of Melbourne • Modules • Glossary • References • Feedback form • Site map • Contact details • People

  10. Content: modules

  11. Modules structure

  12. Interactivity • Animations • Self assessment

  13. Current use • The University of Melbourne • RMIT • University of Alcalá de Henares, Spain • University of Auckland, New Zealand • University of Birmingham, UK • A self-paced learning tool • Tightly integrated into existing learning • Lectures • Practical

  14. Evaluation • Students feedback • Ease of navigation • Look and feel • Information and illustrations • Technical difficulties • Written comments • Usage statistics • Developers perception • Formal examination

  15. Students feedbackUniversity of Alcaláde Henares • 55.88% consider that contact hours could be reduced, BUT • the majority also prefer the lecturer’s presence when learning GIS concepts

  16. Usage statistics www.sli.unimelb.edu.au./weblog/gisweb/log.html

  17. Developers perception Initial costs In lecture tool After lecture reference tool Assignments and lecture notes usage

  18. Formal examination • University of Alcaláde Henares: • MM functionality, animations and interactive tools in particular, helped students to learn dynamic GIS concepts, • The adoption of tools like GISWEB appeared to be more advantageous in students with none or little background in GIS, • Individualised teaching and learning can be assisted by tools like GISWEB where students learn at their own pace; and • Users of GISWEB learnt better and faster.

  19. Issues • Cost: time and money • Difficulties to find skilled programmers • Obsolescence

  20. Conclusions • Positive feedback • Relevance to learning has been determined • Further evidence required • Further developments: • Problem based modules

  21. Acknowledgments The team: Fiona, Gary, Joianna, Jessica, and Karen

More Related