1 / 9

CTSC Administrative Overview

CTSC Administrative Overview. CTSA Administrative Leadership Committee October 2, 2007. Michael Gillis, MBA Associate Director for Administration Dean’s Office. 2921 Stockton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Sacramento, CA 95817 michael.gillis@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/ctsc.

bayard
Download Presentation

CTSC Administrative Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CTSC Administrative Overview CTSA Administrative Leadership Committee October 2, 2007 Michael Gillis, MBAAssociate Director for Administration Dean’s Office 2921 Stockton Boulevard, Suite 1400Sacramento, CA 95817 michael.gillis@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/ctsc

  2. CTSC Organizational Structure • External • CTSA Consortium Members • EAB • UCD Advisory Committees (e.g., science advisory board, CAB, Education Program Advisory Panel) • Partners – VANCHS, Shriners • Internal • Executive leadership (Dean, EAD for Research) • Governance and Oversight Committee • CRRC (formerly GAC) • Weekly Executive Strategy Tteam Meeting • Weekly ‘Staff’ Management Meeting

  3. CTSC Organizational Structure • PI Leadership (Scientific Direction and Collaborations / Vision) • Program, UCD and SOM faculty • SOM and UCD executive leadership • Program leadership • Administrative Oversight (Operational and Programmatic Management) • Staff supervision and guidance • Program management • Project management

  4. CTSC Organizational Structure • Program/Core Leadership • Motivated CTSC faculty • Serve as Program/Core Directors (generally at 5% effort) and Co-Directors (generally at 10-15% effort) • Set the tone and direction of each program • Engage in consortium committees and sub-committees • Staff Leaders in Administration, PCIR/RKS, Informatics • Serve at 100% effort • Execute the strategy of the individual core program with direction from CTSC leadership

  5. CTSC Administrative Structure CTSC is not the GCRC and can not be managed under the GCRC model Administrative oversight includes • Program operations • Re-Engineering of processes (e.g., GAC) • Development and execution of a strategy (e.g., pilot calls, industry collaborations) • Coordination and integration with campus department and centers • Monitoring program/core activities and progress • Constant communication with PI

  6. CTSC Administrative Structure • Administrative Team: • Associate Director for Administration • 2.0 FTE Administrative Support (Executive Support, Internal Communication, Calendar Management) • 1.0 FTE Administrative Analyst V (Grants Management Activities, Financial Modeling, Annual Reports Preparation) • 1.0 FTE Manager, Research Facilitation and Industry Alliances • 1.0 FTE (Indirect) Evaluation Analyst II • 1.0 FTE (Indirect) Community Program Representative III

  7. CTSC Challenges • Engagement, integration and motivation of ‘limited’ appointment CTSC Directors/Co-Directors (Faculty) • Education of campus faculty and staff to convey what the CTSC ‘IS’ and what it ‘IS NOT’ • The CTSC develops partnerships and collaborations • The CTSC does not allocate funding/resources to individual programs / investigators • Limited (and shrinking) resources and high expectations • Leverage other NCRR programs • Coordinate/Share resources with UCD programs (e.g., Cancer Center)

  8. CTSC Successes • Cohesive, dedicated and independent staff • Further developed culture of cooperation and partnership among consortium members as well as investigators, centers and departments • Increased communication across institution and broader awareness of research activities underway • Integration of the CTSC into the institutional framework and recognition as critical resource for Investigators and Research Staff • Growth of interdisciplinary research proposals and projects • NeuroTherapeutics Research Institute (Hagerman) • National Children’s Study – NCS (Hertz-Piccioptto) • Flexibility to re-engineer processes and cultivate a collaborative scientific environment

  9. Questions

More Related