1 / 13

Recent results

Recent results. Marc & Qian. Outline. 3D uniformity scan End cap TOF counter test result Report of moving laser box. 3D Uniformity Scan. 40. 65. 66. Y. 13. 14. 39. 170. 164. (0.300,0.335). 12. 157. 163. 11. 156. 150. 10. 143. 149. 9. 142. 136. 8. 129. 135. 7. 128.

beata
Download Presentation

Recent results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent results Marc & Qian

  2. Outline • 3D uniformity scan • End cap TOF counter test result • Report of moving laser box

  3. 3D Uniformity Scan

  4. 40 65 66 Y 13 14 39 170 164 (0.300,0.335) 12 157 163 11 156 150 10 143 149 9 142 136 8 129 135 7 128 122 6 115 121 Origin (0.240,0.275) 5 114 108 4 101 107 3 100 94 2 87 93 52 53 78/79 1 26 27 86 80 (0.180,0.215) X • We used USTC DAQ system to do the 13x13 3D uniformity scan = 171 total files, which covers a 3mm x 3mm square area. The reason for 171 is because we repeated the origin measurement three times (1st time is at initial origin, 2nd time is on the grid, 3rd time is final file.)

  5. The percent variation over 2.5mm x 2.5mm ~ 13%.

  6. Summary / Conclusion: 1. We did this test before we move the “Moon” Box. 2. We know from our 2 D linear X,Y scans via O-Scope, that we are able to achieve uniformity on the order of ~4%. 3. We now conclude that the USTC/main DAQ interface requires more fine tuning. 4. We know from the ref-PMT data (reading from faster O-Scope) that the laser is quite stable. 5. (To be continued…)

  7. End cap TOF counter test

  8. Hole B Hole A Hole A Hole B We set the HV of EC and Barrel TOF separately to achieve both gain = 1E+5. The Barrel TOF signal’s PH is 165.1 mV. For Hole B, if we use solenoid 3 with 63% transparency, the PH is 164 mV

  9. Summary / Conclusion: • According the EC TOF Fiber installation method, the both holes are easy to achieve. • Using Hole A, we don’t need to use solenoid 3 or filter, the EC TOF and Barrel TOF signals’ PH are almost the same, and Hole A is more stable than Hole B when we wiggled the fiber. Marc & Qian 老善 刘倩

  10. Moving Laser Box

  11. Before we moved the Moon Box, we tested the Ref-PMT PH:

  12. We’ve moved the “Moon Box” into the rack. Then we tested the PH: CH1 (460): 185.8 mV CH2 (486): 195.8 mV

  13. Summary / Conclusion: • After we moved the moon box, we need to do the alignment again. • The PH decreased about 8%. Marc & Qian 老善  刘倩

More Related