1 / 36

UK nuclear industry Low Level Waste strategy

UK nuclear industry Low Level Waste strategy. LLW Policy. Published March 2007 following wide consultation Provides high level framework for taking waste management decisions which are: Safe Environmentally acceptable Cost effective

beata
Download Presentation

UK nuclear industry Low Level Waste strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UK nuclear industry Low Level Waste strategy

  2. LLW Policy Published March 2007 following wide consultation Provides high level framework for taking waste management decisions which are: Safe Environmentally acceptable Cost effective New waste category – high volume very low level waste (HV VLLW) – sub-category of LLW Emphasis in applying the ‘waste management hierarchy’

  3. LLW Policy More flexibility in disposal routes for LLW, including HV VLLW Disposal on or adjacent to nuclear sites Disposal to existing landfill Waste producers are responsible for developing their own waste management plans and strategies Plans must be informed by assessment of potential radiation exposures and risks Upper limits to exposures and risks are the same for all types of radioactive waste disposal sites Lower levels of controls needed for less active wastes

  4. Strategic mandate Policy requires NDA to publish a UK LLW Strategy and Management Plan for integrating LLW management throughout the UK Policy framework introduced a more flexible and fit-for-purpose approach for LLW management centred around the application of the waste hierarchy NDA drafting the UK Nuclear Industry LLW Strategy in parallel with DECC drafting of Non-nuclear Industry LLW strategy

  5. Partnership with LLWR • Partnership implemented as part of successful contract award at the LLW Repository • Purpose is to establish a UK-wide integrated National LLW programme to: • Drive technical innovation • Obtain substantial overall cost savings • Promote waste disposition acceleration • Develop and implement a National LLW Strategy

  6. Total 3M m3 VLLW 1.8M m3 LLW 1.2M m3 The challenge

  7. Inputs and outputs

  8. Inputs and outputs • Key Technical Reports and Strategies • NDA Strategy • Strategic and Site BPEO and Risk Assessments • Strategic Environmental Assessment • LLW Strategic Review • Topical Strategies for LLW Management; • LLWR Operational Strategy • Strategic Technical Briefs • 23 diverse LLW position papers and technical analyses • Life Time Plans and Integrated Waste Strategies • Stakeholder interactions

  9. Strategic Environmental Assessment

  10. SEA “A form of assessment …considers social, economic and environmental effects and appraises them in relation to the aims of sustainable development“ Consistent with Sustainability Appraisal

  11. Work so far Scoping Consultation July 08 Response to Scoping Consultation November 08 Assessment and Environmentaland SustainabilityReport November 08 to April 09

  12. Environment and Sustainability Report Outline of the strategy Relationship with other plans State of the environment Characteristics of affected areas Existing environmental issues Significant (+ve and –ve) effects Proposals to mitigate effects Why proposed options chosen Monitoring proposals

  13. Baseline and Key Issues National baseline using information from NDA and other sources Key Issues: LLWR capacity Discharges and Climate Hazard Reduction Transport Value for Money

  14. Realistic Options As many interrelated options have grouped into 3 ‘considerations’

  15. Treatment and Disposal Options Opportunity to divert from disposal in LLWR Flexible approaches to diverse wastes. Few sustainability objectives discriminate Some objectives inherently local Many options perform similarly Regulation  low radiological impacts

  16. Location of Waste Mangement Facilities Use of existing facilities positive Potential efficiencies with larger facilities Large facilities necessary for some options Transport and traffic is: Modest discriminator Key issue for local Stakeholders Economy and community Positive direct effects on economy Indirect economic effects Community well being

  17. Options for Maintaining Disposal Capacity Optimised use of LLWR preferred Dependant on environmental safety case Planning and regulatory approvals required Significant impacts of large retrieval

  18. …so, what is the proposed strategy?

  19. Strategic Vision • Protect human health and the environment • Facilitate ongoing hazard reduction and decommissioning • Provide continued capability and capacity for the management and disposal of LLW in the UK • Provide a framework for development and implementation of LLW management plans • Consider impacts of waste management options on a national scale • Provide strategic value and balance for LLW Management • Minimise the environmental and social impacts • Provide the most advantageous use of the current repository

  20. Health, safety, security, and environment Waste characterisation and segregation Effective risk-based and proportionate regulation Flexibility and fit-for-purpose solutions Sound business cases and robust decision making Availability of waste routes critical Stakeholder and community engagement vital to new routes NDA waste management facilities available on suitable commercial terms Integrated waste management – important strategic interfaces Environmental and Strategic Principles

  21. Three Strategic Themes

  22. WMH - Avoidance & characterisation • Waste avoidance • Good practice, contaminated land planning, decommissioning planning, decontamination, R&D • Characterisation • NICOP on Clearance and Exemption, R&D, good practice, standard approaches • Sort and segregate • Good practice, incentivise (inc. pricing at LLWR), assistance to consignors ~ new containers

  23. WMH - Minimise, Re-use, and Recycle • Compaction • Continued use of compaction, better packaging • Decay storage • Consideration of decay storage on a case-by-case basis • Re-use and recycling • Maximise opportunities for re-use and recycling of materials; identifying end users for soil, rubble and demolition materials; landscaping

  24. WMH - Treatment • Metal decontamination/melting • Incineration • Will not actively pursue energy recovery due to complexity • Market driven • Supply chain investment; stable competitive market; centralised LLWR procurement services; flexibility needed before disposal • Existing NDA site waste infrastructure • Must demonstrate value for money

  25. Make Best Use of Existing Assets • Optimised use of LLWR • Only appropriate wastes consigned for disposal requiring engineered multi-barrier containment and meeting Conditions for Acceptance • Co-mingling of exempt and VLLW in containers intended for the LLWR shall be avoided as practicable • Early Contingency planning • Replacement national repositories • Integration with deep geological repository and new nuclear build programmes and strategies

  26. Make Best Use of Existing Assets • Optimised Waste Packaging • New packages for enhanced transportation and disposal • Centralised through LLWR to improved integration • Improved Waste Inventory • LLWR will compile best available information on LLW Inventory • Support to national capacity planning and future business cases

  27. Make Best Use of Existing Assets • Improved Methods of Transport • Coordination through LLWR, Consignors, and treatment and disposal facilities in the UK and overseas • Centralised through LLWR to improved integration • LLWR to prepare transport strategy with preference for use of rail infrastructure where practicable and cost effective

  28. New Routes • LLWR • New waste services for all consignors to use • Disposal • Final unretrievable disposal is the end point for all LLW • Options to be considered on a case-by-case basis • VLLW disposal and controlled burial • Disposal capacity needed in near term • Supply chain to be utilised in developing new routes for consignors

  29. New Routes • Proposals for on-site disposal • appropriateness of the site • a comparison with other options – existing facilities? • consideration of the potential benefits • robust Environmental Safety Case • stakeholder interests (public acceptability; supply chain) • impacts on potential future uses of the site • long term impacts on the site (de-licensing, end state and end use)

  30. Three Strategic Themes

  31. Volume Reduction 150,000 HHISOs (2.9million m3) New Repository Required in 2020 New Repository Required in 2080 LLWR Capacity What could be achieved….

  32. …what does this mean in practice?(Strategy implementation)

  33. Strategy Implementation • Lots of good work already being done • Driving the right behaviours and working with others • How it all fits together • Influencing • What we can and can’t do… • UK LLW Management Plan • the detailed initiatives that help us implement this strategy • Operational strategy for LLWR

  34. National LLW Management Plan • Draft National LLW Management Plan will initiate implementation of strategy innovations • Developed by LLWR and issued to NDA on 17 February 2009 • Consulted at National LLW Strategy Group • Focus on: • Implementation of the waste hierarchy • Long-term sustainability • Use of good practice and innovative technology • Available on LLWR website (www.llwrsite.com)

  35. Near Term Deliverables

  36. Longer-Term Expectations • UK LLW Strategy is intended to be flexible and dynamic • Give clear strategic direction for delivery • Maximum synergies across the UK • Optimum flexibility • Alignment for NDA sites via Site Strategic Specifications • Allows for proportionality, affordability, and balance • Update National Strategic Reviews every 2 years • Update National LLW Management Plan annually • Policy Strategy Site Plans

More Related