1 / 9

Watershed Assessment, Tracking, and Environmental Results (WATERS) Forum December 7, 2004

Watershed Assessment, Tracking, and Environmental Results (WATERS) Forum December 7, 2004. Andrew Battin, Director IESD/OIC/OEI U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Data Enterprise License Agreements (ELAs). Working Capital Fund Service ’05 Geospatial Tools and Data.

beate
Download Presentation

Watershed Assessment, Tracking, and Environmental Results (WATERS) Forum December 7, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Watershed Assessment, Tracking, and Environmental Results (WATERS) Forum December 7, 2004 Andrew Battin, Director IESD/OIC/OEI U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  2. DataEnterprise License Agreements (ELAs) • Working Capital Fund Service ’05 • Geospatial Tools and Data. • Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) • TeleAtlas/Geographic Data Technology (GDT) • Dun and Bradstreet • Ordering/Help Desk Service through central support desk at RTP • For More information • http://intranet.epa.gov/rtpgis/esriepaela.html • Gregory Gwaltney, 202 566-1710 • Matt Leopard, Chief of Information Services and Support Branch, OEI on 202 566-1698

  3. DataAdditional Activities • NLCD - $155K • NatureServe • Web service • Agency-level negotiated data acquisitions • Schools • Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) • Developing EPA Remote Sensing Requirements

  4. DataOEI Locational Improvement Efforts • “glue” that ties data for multi-source analysis • Locational Improvement Strategy: • Goal 1: Improve Location in Facility Registry System data • Goal 2: Improve Location in Data Flows • Goal 3: Improve Tech Infrastructure • Goal 4: Develop Locational Policies • POCs: Kevin Kirby, 202.566.1656 Matt Leopard, 202.566.1698

  5. Integrating OW efforts intothe Exchange Network • Exchange Network is the top priority for CIO, and resources will continue for this effort • OW/State partners have identified key data need for exchanging hydro data and features • Exchange Network allows real time sharing of all information resources (including geo) • Coordinate with states on potential for leveraging the exchange network for this purpose • Grant Program

  6. Integrating OW efforts into theEnterprise Architecture: CDX • CDX hosts web forms and “node” services for reporting environmental data across various EPA programs • eNOI • UCMR • eBeaches • ESAR (STORET) under development • As part of locational improvement, Programs want to integrate address mapping and other Geo tools into the web-based flows • Continue to explore WebRIT and its role for enhancing feature location data to support CDX hosted applications

  7. Integrating OW efforts intoTarget EA: Registries • EA “System of Registries (SOR)” consists of facility registry system, substances registry system, and others • EHPTA is defining how SOR addresses polygon, linear, and non-facility locations of interest • OW has addressed non-facility locations through the Reach Address Database (RAD) • Can the RAD be a component of the EA (~ water feature registry)? • Conduct assessment of RAD linkage to FRS

  8. Questions? Andrew Battin battin.andrew@epa.gov 202.566.2140

More Related