1 / 27

Complexity as a Result of Competing Orders in Correlated Materials.

Complexity as a Result of Competing Orders in Correlated Materials. Adriana Moreo Dept. of Physics and ORNL University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. Supported by NSF grants DMR-0443144 and 0454504. Outline. CMR manganites (short overview) High-Tc cuprates Phonons (new results)

bebe
Download Presentation

Complexity as a Result of Competing Orders in Correlated Materials.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Complexity as a Result of Competing Orders in Correlated Materials. Adriana Moreo Dept. of Physics and ORNL University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA. Supportedby NSF grants DMR-0443144 and 0454504.

  2. Outline • CMR manganites (short overview) • High-Tc cuprates • Phonons (new results) Common theme emerging: Clustered states and dramatic effects as a result of small perturbations (complexity)

  3. CMR manganites: PI CE-type Spin, charge, orbital order FM metal Rich phase diagram, several states competing. Common feature of many Strongly Correlated Electronic systems. Potential application in “read sensors”?

  4. Clean limit result: T T T* CO FM CO FM FM Stripes W W SG T First order or tetracritical See also Akahoshi et al. PRL 2003; Argyriou et al., PRL; De Teresa Toy Model with disorder Burgy et al., PRL87, 277202 (2001). See also Nagaosa et al. CO FM W Phase Competition in the Presence of Quenched Disorder

  5. H=0 Rotates easily H=0.01 MR ratios as large as 1000% at H=0.01. CMR effect due to inhomogeneous states Tc T* Field is small, but effective spin is large! Elastic effects (see also Bishop, Egami,…) are important for this to occur in both D=2 and 3 (Burgy et al, PRL 92, 097202 (04)). See also K. Yang, H. Ahn et al., … Resistor Network: FM up FM down Insulator Disorder

  6. Field=0 Field>0 FM regions Conjectured CMR State in Manganites A similar picture will emerge in our high Tc analysis. High susceptibility to external magnetic fields: rapid rotation of preformed nano-moments (see also Cheong et al.)

  7. Theory: Bi, tri, or tetracritical in clean limit. Induced by quenched disorder (II) Similar Scenario in Cuprates?

  8. LSCO (Yamada et al.) Ca2-x Nax Cu O2 Cl2 STRIPES? Hanaguri et al. TILES? BiSCO (Hoffman et al.) Switch to phenomenology for underdoped region … PATCHES? Large clusters and computational methods needed. New Trends: Inhomogeneities in cuprates. Are stripes universal? YBCO Homogeneous?

  9. Homes’ Law Homes et al., Cond-mat/0410719 • Cuprates in all regimes follow the law. • BCS SC follow the law in the dirty limit only.

  10. t Charge DOF Spin DOF J S=1/2 t=1, 2D J~2 J’=0.05 S=1/2 J’ A Spin-Fermion Model as aphenomenological model for HTSC A.M. et al., PRL 84, 2690 (2000); PRL 88, 187001 (2002) (S classical)

  11. Phenomenological SC vs. AF competition Monte Carlo results for ``mean-field-like’’ model of mobile electrons coupled to classical AF (A.M. et al., PRL 88, 187001 (2002)) and SC order parameters (Alvarez et al., cond-mat/0401474). Two parameters: J and V. V=1-J/2 Tetracritical

  12. T* Quenched disorder leads to clusters and T*, as in manganites. Highly inhomogeneous Coulombic centers, as in Sr++. Each provides 1h.

  13. Random orientation of the local SC phases in glassy underdoped region T* AF or CDW Manganites Cartoonish version of MC results SC

  14. SC clusters arches in FS Quasiparticle dispersion in 20x20 cluster 60% AF and 40% d-wave SC. Alvarez et al. AF background sc AF ARPES Yoshida et al. Spin Glass region (no SC) Theory vs Experiment

  15. Effects of Quenched Disorder on a Landau-Ginzburg model with only AF and SC order parameters (no mobile electrons). AF+SC SC AF TRI TETRA

  16. ``non-SC glass’’ ``Inhomogeneous’’ superconductors “Colossal” Effects in underdoped regime? (``Giant proximity effect’’ Decca et al. PRL, and Bozovic et al. submitted to Nature). High susceptibility to ``external SC fields’’ Giant proximity effect? (Alvarez et al., PRB71, 014514 (2005))

  17. Half-Breathing along x Half-Breathing along y Breathing Shear See Y. Yildirim and A.M. cond-mat/0503292 Adiabatic Phonons

  18. Hamiltonian for Phonons Diagonal Coupling: Off-Diagonal Coupling: Stiffness:

  19. Diagonal Term Shear mode Stripes become more localized

  20. Diagonal Term Breathing mode Shear mode Half-Breathing mode

  21. Off-Diagonal Term The stripes become more dynamic

  22. Diagonal Term on Uniform State Shear Mode Breathing Mode Stripes are induced in a uniform ground state

  23. Phonons in the t-J model Half-breathing mode Extended breathing mode Phonons stabilize tiles and stripes A.M. and J. Riera (in preparation)

  24. Quantum Phonons Phonons stabilize stripes! Half-breathing mode

  25. Conclusions • Experiments + theory have revealed nano-scale inhomogeneities in TMOs. Intrinsic PS or first-order transitions smeared by disorder maybe at work. • The mixed-phase states appear to cause the CMR. They may contribute to the unusual behavior of underdoped cuprates. ``Colossal’’ effects may extend beyond manganites. • Phononic degrees of freedom in cuprates seem to produce competing charge inhomogeneous states like stripes and tiles due to breathing and half-breathing modes. Buckling modes will be studied.

  26. Collaborators G. Alvarez (ORNL) C. Sen (FSU) E. Dagotto (UT/ORNL) M. Mayr (Stuttgart) T. Hotta (Tokai) S. Yunoki (Trieste) J. Riera (Argentina) Y.Yildirim (UT) References • A. M. et al., Science 283, 2034 (1999). • J. Burgy et al., PRL 87, 277202 (2001). • G. Alvarez et al., PRB71, 014514 (2005). • Y. Yildirim et al., cond-mat/0503292.

  27. ---------------------------------------

More Related