1 / 12

Modeling & Simulation for Enterprise Test and Evaluation

Modeling & Simulation for Enterprise Test and Evaluation Shala Malone Combat Systems Performance Manager PEO IWS 7D 202 -781-2133 Shala.Malone@navy.mil Rich Reading Cutlass Systems Engineering LLC 301-129-1203 reading@cutlass-se.com 9 May 2007

bernad
Download Presentation

Modeling & Simulation for Enterprise Test and Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Modeling & Simulation for Enterprise Test and Evaluation Shala Malone Combat Systems Performance ManagerPEO IWS 7D202-781-2133Shala.Malone@navy.mil Rich Reading Cutlass Systems Engineering LLC301-129-1203reading@cutlass-se.com 9 May 2007 Distribution Statement A: approved for public release.

  2. Operational Context: Ship Self Defense Ship Defense MOE Probability of Raid Annihilation (PRA) is the ability of a particular stand-alone ship as a system to detect, control, engage, and defeat a specified raid of threats within a specified level of probability in an operational environment • Subsonic, supersonic, high diver • Hi-G maneuvers • Multi-mode seekers BattleTimeline ≈ 30 seconds BattleSpace ≈ 0-12 nmi

  3. Enterprise Test & Evaluation Master Plan The purpose of the Capstone Enterprise Air Warfare Ship Self Defense (AW SSD) Enterprise Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) is to consolidate all AW SSD at-sea testing and PRA Testbed testing • The AW SSD T&E Enterprise Strategy is founded on a two-tiered process to assess AW SSD warfare systems performance: • 1) Validate models with live testing • Operational Ship testing • Self Defense Test Ship (SDTS) testing • 2) Assess performance with models Test Events DT/OT-ET15 thru ET19are formal PRA Testbed events Includes DDG 1000, LHA 6, LCS and CVN 21 ship classes

  4. Navy Ship Self Defense T&E Enterprise IPT Structure SSD T&E Enterprise IPT Chair: PEO IWS Representatives: • DOT&E • COTF • OSD (AT&L) • SEA 06 • IWS WSEs • Ship Class Reps • IWS MPM Reps • N7 • N43 • N091 Chair NAVSEA PH Chair IWS 7D PRA Testbed Configuration Working Group SDTS Configuration Working Group Co-chairs: IWS 7D Ship Class rep Chair IWS 1TE Test Planning & ExecutionWorking Group Testbed Ship Class Baseline Testbed Ship Class Baseline Threat Representation Working Group Testbed Ship Class Baseline Chair N091 Sub-group chairs: N43 for targets, IWS 7D for models

  5. Enterprise PRA Testbed System Engineering – Drivers for Centralized IWS Leadership • Systems performance for PRA assessment spans different technical communities and multiple managing program offices • PRA will be assessed using a federation of interoperable simulations; it will not (cannot) be tested empirically • Complex, multi-spectral, integrated HK/EW problem space • Many specific parameters, assumptions, and limitations are negotiated between the testing and acquisition communities • The testing community is intent on consistent PRA assessment across ship classes and warfare system configurations • Different hulls, different configurations…same threat models, same virtual range conditions

  6. Enterprise PRA Testbed Components “Virtual Range” (Infrastructure) • Testbed Architecture: network interface layer, interface standards, functional allocation standards • Common Threat Models: seeker, airframe/autopilot, signatures, vulnerability • Common Environment Models: tailored authoritative databases, runtime environment data services “Virtual Test Ship”(specific to ship class) • Ship Characteristics • Signature, motion, launcher placements, etc. • Combat System Representation • Authoritative, “T&E quality” models of combat system elements “Virtual Range” Testbed Architecture Common Threat Common Environment Testbed Component Providers: IWS 7D Ship Class PM IWS Project Offices Navy PRA Testbed Ship Class Baseline Combat System Element Combat System Element Combat System Element Combat System Element Ship-specific Characteristics “Virtual Test Ship”

  7. Enterprise Testbed Construct • Provides Enterprise-level definitions and guidance for Testbed development • Single master document addressing: • CONOPS • Roles & responsibilities • Federation system engineering • Simulation architecture • Virtual Range development and use • VV&A process management • Configuration management • Draft in-process

  8. Current Simulation Framework Characteristics • HLA federation implementation • All system representations execute simultaneously for each ship defense engagement • Geographically distributed • Constructive simulation, conservative time management • System representations are a mix of digital models and tactical software • Most representations are a hybrid of tactical SWIL and digital model • Most tactical SW re-hosted to general purpose computers

  9. ASCM Seeker, Airframe, Autopilot Threat Types 5 reactive multi-threat raid Ship Motion & Signatures Decoys Threat/Ship Federate PRA Testbed Deployment LPD 17 Baseline JHU Applied Physics Lab Laurel, MD Naval Research Lab Washington, DC NAWC Weapons Division China Lake SIPRNET Virtual Range Instrumentation: SIMDIS, RePLAYS, HLA_Results Scenario & Environment Federate (SEF) Background Targets/ Emitters SPS-48E SPQ-9B SLQ-32 Network Interface Layer Key: Physics-based Model SSDS CEP Common Lethality Server RAM Missile Salvo RAM Launcher Tactical SWIL/HWIL Deployed over a series of4 spiral Builds

  10. Enterprise PRA Testbed Status • PRA Testbed Configuration Working Group Established Under Ship Self Defense T&E Enterprise • Chaired by IWS 7D, Shala Malone • Testbed baseline IPTs established for current Enterprise ship classes: LHA 6, DDG 1000, CVN 21, and LCS • LPD 17 Testbed Development Underway in Support of Ship Class OT&E • 3rd of 4 spirals completed; final Build integration May07 • LPD 17 assessment ‘runs for score’ commence Aug 07 • completion Planned for CY08

  11. CVN 21 Testbed Baseline LCS Testbed Baseline LHA 6 Testbed Baseline DDG 1000 Testbed Baseline LPD 17 Testbed Baseline Enterprise PRA Testbed Evolution Consistent Testbed development across ship classes and CS configurations Enterprise PRA Testbed Baselines … Common architecture, common threats & environment, model re-use Validated models, lessons learned, arch. advances Process Standards & Architecture Testbed Configuration Management PEO IWS 7D Leadership Common Virtual Range … SPS-48E SPS-49A ES CEC RAM CIWS SM-6 SIAP PEO IWS Project Offices SPQ-9B DBR Decoys SSDS TSCE ESSM OpenArch. Element System Representations

  12. Challenges Ahead • Relationship of PRA Testbed simulations to other M&S supporting system development and T&E • Improved mechanisms for injecting data needs into planning of empirical tests • Feedback of knowledge and capabilities to early phase acquisition systems engineering • Extension of PRA Testbed to address other MOEs • Evolution of PRA Testbed to next spiral of T&E Enterprise • battlespace extension, force level representation

More Related