1 / 30

Introduction to Entanglement

Introduction to Entanglement. Allan Solomon, Paris VI. Mathematics Prelude. Paradigm: Quantum mechanics & Maths. Mathematics Prelude. Entanglement (Fr.) Intrication (Eng.) Intricate = Complexity involves Analysis, Algebra , Topology,Combinatorics.

beth
Download Presentation

Introduction to Entanglement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to Entanglement Allan Solomon, Paris VI

  2. Mathematics Prelude • Paradigm: Quantum mechanics & Maths

  3. Mathematics Prelude • Entanglement • (Fr.) Intrication(Eng.) Intricate = Complexityinvolves Analysis, Algebra , Topology,Combinatorics Borromean Rings – example of an entangled system

  4. Physics Prelude: EPR paradox Source emits spin singlet Measurement by Alice on |y> determines Bob’s measurement. The electrons are entangled.

  5. “Entanglement is the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics” Erwin Schroedinger, 1935.

  6. “Interference (in Classical and Quantum Mechanics) is just the fact that the sum of squares is not the square of the sum.” Richard Feynman

  7. 1 Vectors, Vector Spaces A basic operation for vectors is addition. For mathematicians therefore, vector addition presents no surprises. For physicists, vector addition is such a remarkable property that in quantum mechanics the phenomena it gives rise to it go by many names, superposition rule, interference, entanglement,…

  8. Vector notation Maths Notation Physics Notation Dirac

  9. 2 Bipartite Spaces Maths Notation Physics Notation If V1 has basis {ei} and V2 has basis {fj} then {ei Äfj, i=1..m,j=1..n} is a basis forV1ÄV2 Every vector in V1ÄV2 is a sum of products; but not every vector is a product. If it is a product, then it is said to be non-entangled.

  10. Bipartite Spaces: Entanglement Example: Not entangled Entangled “entangled” means not factorizable

  11. 3 States, Pure and Mixed (a) Pure States Vectors correspond to Pure states: example We may equally represent a Pure State |y> by the Operator (Projector) |y><y| which projects onto that state: NOTE: trace P=1 (Normalization) andP is Hermitian with (semi-)positive eigenvalues (0 and 1 ).

  12. States (b) Mixed States We define a (mixed) state r as a positive matrix of trace 1 Note: A mixed state is a mixture of pure states. which is a (convex) sum of pure states.

  13. Mixed state is not a unique sum of pure states Example:

  14. 4 Entropy of a State (Von Neumann Entropy) John Von Neumann Claude Shannon State r has eigenvaluesli usually log2 (E is entropy here!) Example(a): Pure state Every Pure State has Entropy Zero. Example(b): Mixed state Maximum entropy 1 for maximally random state.

  15. 5 Measures of Entanglement Entangled? E Measure Intuitively we expect It turns out that the (VN) Entropy gives a measure of entanglement for pure states; but not directly, as all pure states have entropy zero. We must first take the Partial Trace over one subsystem of the bipartite system.

  16. 6 Partial Trace If V = VAÄ VB then trB(QAÄ QB)=QA tr(QB) Extend to sums by linearity. Pure States: QA =|u1><u2| QB=|v1><v2| then trB (QAÄ QB)= |u1><u2| <v2| v1> Example (non-entangled state): Entanglement (Entropy of partially traced state) is 0.

  17. Example: Bell state John Stewart Bell |b>=(1/Ö2)(|0,0>+|1,1>) rb=(1/2)(|0,0>+|1,1>) )(<0,0|+<1,1|) TrB(rb)=(1/2)(|0><0| + |1><1|) =

  18. Example (Entangled state): Entropy of partially traced state is non-zero (=.55)

  19. Entangled state (intermediate) Pure state cos(q)|0,0>+sin(q)|1,1> = Þ So this measure of entanglement gives an intuitively correct variation from 0 (non-entangled) to maximum of 1 (Bell state) for PURE States.

  20. Recap: Definitions • A pure state may be represented by a vector or a positive matrix (Projection matrix) with eigenvalues 1, 0, … 0, 0, 0 • A mixed state is a (convex) sum of pure states and may be represented by a positive matrix of trace 1. • A pure state is separable (non-entangled) if it can be written as a product of vectors (factorizable). • A mixed state is separable if it can be written as a (convex) sum of separable (factorizable) pure states. • The expression of a mixed state as a convex sum of pure states is not unique.

  21. Measure of Entanglement • The entanglement E(y) of a pure bipartite state yÎVAÄVB is given by the Entropy of the Partial Trace of y • The entanglement E(r) of a mixed bipartite state rÎVAÄVB is given byE(r)=min{SliE(yi)| r= Sliyi}

  22. This definition of entanglement measure for Mixed States is very difficult to apply, requiring infinite tests. • Example (revisited) E(r)=3/4´0+ 1/4´1=0.25 E(r1)=1/2´0.118+ 1/2´0.118=0.118(this IS the min and therefore the entanglement )

  23. Concurrence C = 7 Concurrence (Physics viewpoint) • Spin Flip Operation qubit 2-qubit Factorizable state Bell state C=0 C=1 So Concurrence gives a measure of entanglement for PURE states

  24. Recall C varies from 0 to 1 so Concurrence gives a measure of entanglement for PURE states Equivalently (for pure states) C2=tr Concurrence (Maths viewpoint) Partial trace of Pure state r gives 2X2 matrix so Entanglement determined by eigenvalue equation l2-l+D=0 l=(1±Ö(1-4D))/2 Concurrence C2=4D

  25. Wootters’ Concurrence • Wootters[1,2] has shown that the form for C where the l’s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of in descending order Gives the entanglement for mixed states; i.e. it gives the correct minimum over Pure States. (Note the formula coincides with the previous for PURE states.) [1] Hill, S and Wootters, WK, PhysRevLett 78,26,5022(1997) [2] Wootters, WK, PhysRevLett 80,10,2245(1998)

  26. Feynman Nobel Lecture • The Development of the Space-Time View of Quantum Electrodynamics • “We have a habit in writing articles published in scientific journals to make the work as finished as possible, to cover all the tracks, to not worry about the blind alleys or to describe how you had the wrong idea first, and so on.”

  27. Tripartite entanglement • “Naïve Solution” • Extend Concurrence to 3-subspace Pure states by summing over (3) Partial Traces • Example Three Partial Traces are equal, each with Concurrence 2/3 , leading to a 3-concurrence of (1/3) (2/3+2/3+2/3)=2/3

  28. Tripartite states • However ………. The entangled state (1/Ö2)(|000>+|111>) has 3 equal partial traces which is separable (concurrence =0). Borromean Rings analogy – every cut leaves a separable system

  29. A funny “Resource” • Physicists do experiments on the principle that they can be replicated in other laboratories – invariance under transformations. • In Quantum mechanics, we expect our measurable quantities to be invariant under Unitary Transformations (or anti-unitary – Wigner) • This is NOT the case for Entanglement! Eugene Wigner

  30. Open Problems • What is the significance of Entanglement for Quantum Computing? • Find a measure of Entanglement for 3 (or more) qubits (tripartite spaces,..). • Interaction with the Environment (Dissipation of Entanglement)

More Related