1 / 22

My PhD Project

My PhD Project. Quantifying Visual Cues of Psychological States in Interview Situations (QVCPS). 18/05/2005 Enrica Dente Email: enrica.dente@imperial.ac.uk Website: http://www.enricadente.com/imperial/. Contents. Problem Hypothesis Project Objectives Project Plan Achievements to Date

betty_james
Download Presentation

My PhD Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MyPhD Project Quantifying Visual Cues of Psychological States in Interview Situations (QVCPS) 18/05/2005 Enrica Dente Email: enrica.dente@imperial.ac.uk Website: http://www.enricadente.com/imperial/

  2. Contents • Problem • Hypothesis • Project Objectives • Project Plan • Achievements to Date • Conclusion Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  3. Problem • Most lie detection approaches can only detect “psychological states”, not “deception” (i.e. are less than 80% accuracy) [Vrij, 2004] • Manual observation of human behavior subjective and limited [Burgoon, 2005] • Polygraph, 100 years old lie detector problematic but still in use • Increased interest in alternative approaches: • Automated Face Analysis (i.e. changes in facial expressions) • Thermal imaging (i.e. changes in blood flow around eyes) • FMRI (i.e. BOLD) • Brain fingerprinting (i.e. brain waves) • Eye tracking (i.e. irregular eye movements in front of images ) • Intrusiveness yet to be addressed. Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  4. Hypothesis • Non skilled liars more likely to experience cognitive load and controlled behavior[Vrij, 2004] • Decrease of hand/finger movements when subjects lie yet to be proved (or disproved) • Quantification of observations required • Focus on tracking of hand/finger movements in interview situations • Real life cases can make a difference in results but problematic [Vrij 2005] • Verbal behavior required to add context to the tracking Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  5. Project Objectives • To automate the tracking of finger/hand movements in interview situations • Tocompute the frequency of hand and finger movements normalised to the baseline of each individual • To build a biomechanical model to aid hand gesture tracking • To provide a simple means of accessing and referring to the verbal behaviour, when required • Later, to compare the movements of the interviewee with the movements of the interviewer. Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  6. Project Plan • Year 1: • Skin Colour Modelling • Hand Tracking and Finger Position • Coding behaviour markup • Background Modelling • Graphical User Interface • Experimental Protocol • Year 2 and Year 3: • Kinematic models of upper body, limb and finger motion • Introduction of verbal behavior to add context to tracking • Train system to quantify different types of hand and finger movements • Writing up. Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  7. Achievements to Date: 1) Segmentation (a) Skin Colour Modelling • Color Predicate[Kieldsen, 1996] • Bayesian Posterior Map and Parzen colour space probability density estimates more accurate. (b) Hand Tracking and Finger Position • Connected Component and central moments • Centroid correspondence • Hands separation based on area and distance heuristics • Complex wavelet decomposition to detect changes in finger position. • Next Step: background modelling using parametric methods to address robustness. Figure 1 -Hand Tracking Figure 2 -Finger Orientations Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  8. (a) Skin Colour Modelling • Joint Conditional Density function in hue and sat for hand and non-hands (i.e. Parzen density estimation) where H and S represent hue and sat, Hn and Sn represent the observed values amongst the NH hands training set pixels, KH is a normalised constant and σ0 species the width of the kernel used in smoothing • Bayesian Posterior Map to identify most probable locations of skin in each frame where we assume that p(H,S | Hands) is approximated by the left hand side of Equation (1) and p(H,S | NonHands) is approximated by the left hand side of Equation (2). (1) (2) Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  9. Figure 3 - Likelihood function for hand regions in a), for non-hand regions in b) (a) Skin Colour Modelling (cont.) • Parzen colour space probability density estimates for hand and for non-hand regions • There is overlap between the two classes Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  10. (b) Hand Tracking and Finger Position HAND TRACKING: • Centroid correspondence of each object across frames from binary image created in (a) • Connected component analysis to label blobs. • Switch from a one-hand to two-hand state by using distance and area heuristics. FINGER POSITION: • Complex wavelet decomposition • Orientation of local image structure relatively invariant to local phase • Filter bank of complex wavelets, each tuned to one of four directions • We compare output of four complex masks to make estimate of the presence of a line or an edge in each direction • Vector indicating the direction of local image structure estimated by a weighted vector summation operation • Multirate scheme (i.e. series of different scales). Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  11. Finger Position Estimate • K/2 of the real and imaginary impulse responses of wavelets at scale 1 for K = 8 • Orientation field O(l) (m, n) is defined by: Figure 4 -WaveletKernels Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  12. Figure 5 (a) Hands together (b) Hands moving Finger Position Estimate (.cont) • Histogram of orientations for each hand in each frame • Weighting of the product of the orientation • Field magnitude and posterior skin tone map to appropriate histogram bin • Orientation density functions can be used to detect finger movement! Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  13. Achievements to Date:2)XML Markup for Behavior Coding Check Verbal behavior: Check Non Verbal behavior: Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  14. Achievements to Date:3) Graphical User Interface (GUI) Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  15. Achievements to Date:4) Experimental Protocol • Stakes low in current lie detection experiments: • Interviewees are asked to lie on simulated actions • Interviewees less motivated to lie than in real-life situations, performance less effective • Vrij’s real-life police interview limited to visual observation of one liar • Problem: questions based on prior knowledge of what the interviewees will lie on and when • Our experimental protocol aims to raise the stakes of deception detection in interview situations: • Solution: design experiments where interviewees are not told in advance what they have to lie on. Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  16. Literature Review1) Skin Colour Modelling • Non Parametric Methods • Create an histogram or lookup table (LUT) common and simple • However, storage required, bins may miss pixel values, noise removal and occlusion still an issue • Bayesian posterior map computed from “hands” and non “hands” histograms more promising than Colour Predicate • Parametric Methods • Model skin colour as components of mixtures of Gaussians • Provide robustness, no need for storage space and ability to interpolate or generalise the training data • However, they require accurate initialization and assume number of components to be known in advance Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  17. Literature Review1) Skin Colour Modelling • Parametric Methods (cont.) • Foreground and background modelled by a joint probability density function • Model parameters (i.e. means and covariance) for the Gaussians estimated from the training data using maximum likelihood or Bayesian inference • Updated online based on colour, on position and/or on motion information • Skin probability computed from Gaussian Probability Density Functions (PDF's) • However, in interview situations update cannot be based on assumption that foreground is moving. Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  18. Literature Review2) Kinematic 3-D models • Need accurate tracking of hand/finger gestures • Choice of degrees of freedom crucial • Choice of type of model (i.e. stick figure or statistical) • Need markers for validation • Need simple and consistent movements • Does deception occur fast or slow in interviews? • How can we track several movements at the same time? Number of cameras? • How visible can hand's edges be in interviews? Camera resolution? Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  19. Conclusion • Problem and Hypothesis: • Most lie detection approaches detect “psychological states”, not “deception” • Non skilled liars more likely to experience cognitive load and controlled behavior • Quantification of observations required • Achievements to Date: • Hand Tracking using Bayesian Posterior Map • Finger Position using Complex Wavelets • XML markup for correlating visual and verbal behavior • Experimental Protocol • Next Step: • Background modelling to address robustness. Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  20. Questions? Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  21. References • [Vrij, 2004] Vrij Aldert, Psychology, Crime and Law, Challenging Interviewees During Interviews, The Potential Effects on Lie Detection, 2004 • [Vrij2, 2004] Vrij Aldert, Why Professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159-181, 2004 • [Vrij, 2002] Aldert Vrj, Detecting Lies and Deceit : The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Inc • [Watson, 1081] Watson, K. W. Oral and written linguistic indices of deception during employment interviews. (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, 1981). Dissertations Abstracts International, 42, 06A 2367. • [Parker et al., 2000] Parker, A. & Brown, J., Detection of deception: Statement Validity Analysis as a means of determining truthfulness or falsity of rape allegations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 237-259, 2000 Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

  22. References (cont.) • [Bradley, 1993] Bradley MT, Cullen MC, Polygraph lie detection on real events in a laboratory setting, 76(3 Pt 1):1051-8, Percept Mot Skills. June 1993 • [Etcoff, 2000] Nancy L. Etcoff*, Paul Ekman, John J. Magee, Mark G. Frank, NATURE , VOL 405, 11 MAY 2000, Lie detection and language comprehension, 2000 Macmillan Magazines Ltd, Available Online: http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v405/n6783/full/405139a0_fs.html&content_filetype=pdf • [Kieldsen, 1996] R. Kjeldsen and J. Kender. Finding skin in color images. In Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 1996. • [Burgoon, 2005] J. Burgoon et al. An approach for intent identi- • cation by building on deception detection. In Proc. of the 38th Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. on Detection of Deception: Collaboration Systems and Technology, 2005. • [Bharath, 2003] A. Bharath and J. Ng. A Steerable Complex Wavelet Construction and Its Application to Image Denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. June 2003 Enrica Dente, QVCPS Project

More Related