1 / 25

The Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and the Decision Making Process

The Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and the Decision Making Process. Bobbie Klein 1 Lisa Dilling 1, 2 Western Water Assessment 1 Center for Science and Technology Policy Research , University of Colorado Boulder 2 Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado Boulder.

beulahs
Download Presentation

The Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and the Decision Making Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and the Decision Making Process Bobbie Klein1 Lisa Dilling1, 2 Western Water Assessment 1Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado Boulder 2Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado Boulder

  2. The Colorado Motivation for study Consistent with WWA’s mission to provide information that can assist decision makers, we wanted to learn: • Who are CBRFC stakeholders, what do they feel are their current and future vulnerabilities, and how do they cope? • How can the dust on snow and bark beetle research be useful to CBRFC stakeholders?

  3. Methodology • Reviewed literature on decision maker use of forecasts. While a variety of factors explain non-use of forecasts, generally a key determinant of forecast use is perception of risk based on previous experience. Forecast skill is generally not as critical to use. • In consultation with CBRFC, developed a survey covering 3 areas: • background information about stakeholders • vulnerability (weather and climate events respondents have experienced or expect to experience) and coping mechanisms • how stakeholders use forecasts; knowledge of/concern about dust on snow and bark beetle • Pretested survey with water managers • Compiled list of current and potential CBRFC stakeholders including CBRFC stakeholder meeting attendees, managers of ~80 reservoirs monitored by CBRFC, NWS forecasters, Bureau of Reclamation roster of water users in the Upper Colorado Region, emergency managers • Distributed survey to 141 stakeholders via Survey Monkey last summer; 70 stakeholders responded

  4. Background information about stakeholders

  5. Survey respondents work for: • federal agencies (23) • water conservancy districts (11) • regional water entities (9) • municipal water utilities (8) • flood control districts (3) • organizations providing either research, consulting, or work on policy issues (3) • state agencies (2) • irrigation districts (2) • electric power providers (2) ~half describe affiliation as water management, 14% govt forecasting, 8% emergency mgmt/flood control; the remainder scattered among ag, research, energy, water treatment, recreation, environmental, etc.

  6. II. Vulnerability and Coping Mechanisms

  7. Events experienced in past 10 years

  8. Problems caused by events

  9. Perception of likelihood of future events

  10. Past use and effectiveness of coping mechanisms

  11. Likelihood of using coping mechanisms in future

  12. Top short- and long-term concerns Short-term • Climate variability/change incl extreme events and drought • Water supply/demand balance • Budget issues • Wildfire Long-term • Climate variability/change incl extreme events and drought • Water supply/demand balance • Colorado River Compact issues • Population growth

  13. III. Use of forecasts and decision making

  14. Decision for which CBRFC forecasts are useful • Reservoir operations such as timing and volume of releases (15) • Flooding (7) • Issuing warnings (6) • Drought response (4) • Environmental issues (3) • Power (2) • Irrigation, maintenance, treatment plant, purchases, field work (1 each)

  15. Factors that limit use of CBRFC forecasts

  16. Next steps One-on-one interviews of ~10-15 survey respondents. Possible areas of inquiry: • Short and long-term organizational concerns • Coping mechanisms – past and future • How CBRFC forecasts and other information are used in decision making; how much weight is given to this information • What information about the dust on snow and bark beetle research would be useful to decision makers; what form should the information take

  17. For questions about CBRFC stakeholder survey: Bobbie Klein Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado Boulder bklein@colorado.edu For questions about WWA dust on snow and bark beetle research: Ben Livneh ben.livneh@gmail.com

  18. For more information and contacts for all of the projects mentioned and many more: Western Water Assessment website: http://wwa.colorado.edu/

More Related