1 / 25

Measuring children’s participation rights

Whistler, 26 th -30 th October 2009 Gerison Lansdown. Measuring children’s participation rights. Participation... Where are we?. Huge progress over past 20 years, but..... Lack of clarity of definition Lack of legal frameworks Cultural barriers and adult resistance

bevis
Download Presentation

Measuring children’s participation rights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Whistler, 26th-30th October 2009 GerisonLansdown Measuring children’s participation rights

  2. Participation... Where are we? • Huge progress over past 20 years, but..... • Lack of clarity of definition • Lack of legal frameworks • Cultural barriers and adult resistance • Lack of adult capacities and awareness • Lack of tools for assessing/measuring work being done

  3. Why is it necessary to measure participation • To assess the strengths and weaknesses of initiatives • To identify the support and resources needed to strengthen initiatives • To provide evidence to support the case for political commitment to the realisation of children’s participation rights. • To provide evidence to enable replication and sustainability of programmes • To demonstrate effectiveness to donors • To identify the legislative and policy environment needed to promote and respect children’s right to participation • To enable children to gain a greater understanding of what they hope to achieve.

  4. Challenges • There are no agreed indicators • It is difficult to construct universally applicable indicators of relevance to different cultural, social and economic contexts • Children themselves have a role to play in determining the indicators against which they wish to measure initiatives in which they are involved. • The outcomes of participation are often qualitative not quantitative and therefore hard to measure • Many of the desired outcomes of participation relate to sustainable long-term changes in children’s lives which cannot be measured within a short time period.

  5. Purpose of tool • To map the extent to which participation is institutionalised at all levels of society; • To provide a tool for determining priorities for building a culture of respect for children’s right to express views and be taken seriously; • To help determine the nature of participation at the outset of a project or programme; • To establish goals for participation and help monitor the extent to which those goals are realised; • To monitor and evaluate the scope, quality and impact of participation at the end of a project or programme

  6. Two dimensions to address • The external environment – laws, policies, information, attitudes, opportunities which facilitate or impede participation • The internal environment – the nature, quality and impact of participation itself

  7. The external environment: • Indicators to measure legal entitlements to participate • Indicators to measure the right of access to information • Indicators to measure awareness-raising on children’s participation rights • Indicators to measure opportunities to influence public decisions • Indicators to measure respect for children’s participation in their daily lives

  8. Indicators: legal entitlements to participate • Child-friendly court procedures are introduced for child victims and witnesses • Respect is given to children’s evolving capacities • Confidential mechanisms are in place for children to complain and to seek redress in cases to abuse, without fear of reprisals • Children are entitled to be heard at all stages of child protection procedures • Children in public care are entitled to be involved in decision-making processes affecting their lives • Children are entitled to be heard in civil proceedings affecting them eg custody, access and adoption • Children and adolescent are legally supported and permitted to form their own organisations to forward child rights • All schools are required to support the establishment of democratic school councils. • Family law includes provisions on parental obligations including the obligation to involve children in decisions affecting them.

  9. Indicators: the right of access to information • Primary (and secondary) education is compulsory and free. • Children have access to independent information from a wide range of sources • Information is readily available in child-friendly and accessible formats that are appropriate for children of different ages and disabilities. • Human rights and child rights education is included in the school curriculum. • Children have knowledge about their rights, and how to realise them.

  10. Indicators: awareness-raising on children’s participation rights • Child rights training, including a focus on participation, is introduced at pre- and in-service levels for all professionals working with and for children. • Programmes of parent (for both mothers and fathers) education on child rights and child participation are developed and made widely available. • Policy makers are sensitive to and aware of children’s right to participation

  11. Indicators: opportunities to influence public decisions • Children are consulted on development of local and national government legislation, policies, services and resource allocations • Children are represented in local and national governance bodies • Children have the right to establish their own organisations  • Democratic child-led organisations are supported at national and local level. • Children have meaningful opportunities to control their own organisations • Children have the opportunity to use broadcast media to communicate their own views. • Children have access to progressive technologies e.g. information communication technologies

  12. Indicators: respect for children’s participation in their daily lives • Children are consulted within families when decisions affecting them are being made. • Schools provide a child friendly, participatory and inclusive learning environment. • Children can access confidential health care services, including reproductive health care • Children can access community based child protection services • Children participate in local community actions. • Child friendly cities and communities are introduced.

  13. Example: Access to legal entitlements

  14. Example: Access to information: Indicators

  15. The internal environment:Measuring child participation within programmes Three dimensions….. • Scope - what degree of participation has been achieved and at what stages of programme development - in other words – What is being done? • Quality - to what extent have participatory processes complied with the agreed standards for effective practice – in other words – How is it being done? • Change - what have been the changes – on children and young people themselves, on families, on the supporting agency, and on the wider realisation of children and young people’s rights within families, local communities and at local and national governmental level – in other words – Why is it being done?

  16. Scope of child and adolescent participation throughout the programme cycle • Point of engagement - Children can be involved at different stages in the process of developing a programme – from the initial concept through to implementation and monitoring and evaluation. The earlier they are involved, the greater their degree of influence. • Level of engagement - At each stage of developing a programme, there are three potential levels of engagement for children. The extent to which children are empowered to exercise agency within an initiative will be influenced by the level at which they are participating. However, all three are valid approaches and can be appropriate, depending on the goals of the programme or initiative.

  17. Consultative processes Characterised by being: • Adult initiated • Adult led and managed • Lacking any possibility for children to control outcomes

  18. Collaborative processes Characterised by being: • Adult initiated • Involving partnership with children • Empowering children to influence or challenge both process and outcomes • Allowing for increasing levels of self-directed action by children over a period of time

  19. Self-initiated processes Characterised by: • The issues of concern being identified by children themselves • Adults serving as facilitators rather than leaders • Children controlling the process

  20. Example: Measuring the scope of participation

  21. Measuring the quality of participation • An ethical and transparent approach • Child sensitive and enabling environment • Voluntary and relevant participation • Inclusive participation • Safe environment • Trained, committed and sensitive staff • Training and support for children • Community, professional and family links • Commitment of resources

  22. Example: Quality participation: Indicators

  23. Quality participation: Indicators

  24. Measuring the changes associated with participation • Changes experienced by children themselves • Changes in parents views/attitudes • Changes in staff views/attitudes • Changes in services/programmes/organisations/ institutions • Changes within the community • Changes in the realisation of children’s rights/ government

  25. Example: Changes associated with participation: indicators

More Related