1 / 51

Week 4

Week 4. Strategy use in Children: Formerly “Changes in the Software”. Last Week…. Information processing approach to cognitive development Changes may occur in the hardware : Capacity Speed Efficiency. Changes in Software. Knowledge base E.g. Chess, karate, golf… Strategies:

bien
Download Presentation

Week 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Week 4 Strategy use in Children: Formerly “Changes in the Software”

  2. Last Week… • Information processing approach to cognitive development • Changes may occur in the hardware: • Capacity • Speed • Efficiency

  3. Changes in Software • Knowledge base • E.g. Chess, karate, golf… • Strategies: • Goal-directed, deliberately implemented mental operations used to facilitate task performance

  4. Features of strategy development • Not linear • Used in many / most areas of cognitive functioning • Some are self-learned; others taught more formally • Continue to develop beyond first use • Great variability in what children use • Children integrate strategies that they have

  5. Training Studies • Began in 1960’s • 3 step model of strategy acquisition • No spontaneous use of strategy • Will not produce, but will use when shown • Produce and use on own

  6. Stage 1 characterized by mediational deficiency • Strategy shown to them fails to elicit better performance • E.g. Fail to use rehearsal to simplify memory task

  7. Stage 2 characterized by production deficiency • Can use strategies, but don’t think them up on own • Will rehearse if you tell them to • Part-way between stage 1 and 2…moving word example

  8. Moving Word Task BUS

  9. Moving Word Task BUS Children under 5 will say the card now says frog!!

  10. Our modification of the Moving Word task • 4-year-olds • 3 conditions: pre-made, on-site prep, prep on own • No clear strategy was evident • Were unable to give correct answer under any of these conditions • They may not have been using a strategy at all, or they misused the one they did pick!

  11. Point: • Children with production deficiency can learn a strategy but often appear to not have one to begin with • Are they completely a-strategic or strategy-free? • No – but their strategy may not be obvious

  12. What do production deficient children do?? • Primitive strategies that may lead them astray • May explain some phenomena (e.g. dccs, concentration)

  13. Argument against? • Huffman & Bray • Children may not be deficient: we may be asking wrong questions • See four things as important • Modality • Available tools? • Task difficulty? • Individual differences in span

  14. Huffman & Bray • Tested 7- and 11-year-olds • Lots of memory span measures • Primary measure had 4 conditions: • Auditory, no objects • Auditory, objects • Visual, no objects • Visual, objects

  15. Huffman & Bray • No age differences in strategy use • Little relationship between span and strategy • Qualitative differences in kind of strategy use • Younger children used more external strategies without orientation • They did not differentiate between load sizes • Objects helped all • All did badly in auditory

  16. Point… • Young children (< 7) are not always unable to use strategies, it just depends on how you ask them • Also, what you give them to help themselves

  17. Stage 3: • Older children at this stage thought to be perfect strategy users, but not so • Often exhibit a utilization deficiency, where they seem to use a strategy, but doesn’t really help • Bjorklund et al., 1994

  18. Bjorklund et al., 1994

  19. Memory Strategies or Mnemonics • Mnemonics Neatly Eliminate Man’s Only Nemesis: Insufficient Cerebral Storage • Dr. Mrs. Vandertrampp • Bedmas • I before e except after c, and when you say A, as in neighbour and weigh • You should get twice as much deSSert • FACE • Every Good Boy Deserves Fudge

  20. Memory Strategies • Only useful if they have meaning • Referring mainly to context-independent memory • We study different kinds of strategies • Rehearsal • Organization • Elaboration • Retrieval

  21. Rehearsal • Overt strategies: lip movement • Digit span • Studies of recall • Children will not use adequate rehearsal strategy until the age of around 12: • Passive vs. active rehearsal sets

  22. Organization • Remember this list: Knife, shirt, car, fork, boat, pants, sock, truck, spoon, plate

  23. Organization • Can be taught to cluster, but only if all things to recall are visually displayed (Ornstein et al.) • Why? IP says: Takes up too much space

  24. Organization • Very difficult strategy not typically evident until early teens • Hasselhorn (1992) showed children as old as 8 would not group pictures into categories • Extensive and explicit training may help, but have to be told to use strategy. • Children show a utilization deficiency until about 12 • Related knowledge of objects and vocabulary

  25. Elaboration • Can involve abstract imagery, which according to Piaget was not in place until 14, or this developmental phase…? • If learning a language, you might associate a word with a picture…

  26. Duck in Spanish is Poto: You may try to remember a duck in a pot

  27. Spanish word for horse is : Caballo, or cab-eye-o, so you may try to remember a horse hitting an eye (bull’s eye)

  28. Elaboration • Can involve abstract imagery, which according to Piaget was not in place until 14, or this developmental phase…? • If learning a language, you might associate a word with a picture… • Method of loci

  29. Retrieval Processes • Getting information out once it goes in • General questions = general answers • Focus on encoding, get them to pay attention to thing they are trying to remember, provide many cues (levels-of-processing) • By grade 6, children will benefit less from imposed structure, because they are using their own

  30. Knowledge and strategy use • 3 effects that knowledge has: • Effects of item-type • Better memory for familiar items • Non-strategic organization • Better memory if effortless org. is possible • Facilitating strategies • Good knowledge base about a set of items allows use of strategy

  31. Metacomponents • Consciousness of how one’s own thought processes work • Can be explicit or implicit

  32. Sternberg’s theory of intelligence Intelligence Knowledge acquisition components Metacomponents Performance components Strategy construction Strategy Selection Strategy Coordination

  33. Metacomponents • Meta-attention • Children do not always know how to pick and choose what they attend to • Evident in math problems…(Majumder, 2003)

  34. James has 3 muffins. He has 2 muffins fewer than Ben. Mark has 14 muffins, which is 8 more than Hal. How many muffins does Ben have? • Children have difficulty with these • Performance correlated with measures of inhibition (Simon task)

  35. Metamemory • Awareness of one’s own memory abilities • Adults underestimate; children overestimate • Some kids (<7 years) fail to recognize usefulness: do not generalize • E.g. Fabricius & Hagen, 1984

  36. Metamemory trajectory 1st grade: will not gain from learning strategy 3rd grade: if they know it helps , they will use it 6th grade: do not require help

  37. Metamemory in ASD • Children with ASD thought to be passive, no active participation in IP • Strategy use only evident in simplest tasks (rote recall) • Bebko & Ricciuti looked at strategy use in children with ASD

  38. Bebko & Ricciuti, 2000 • Task: recall picture cards in either a specific order or in open recall • First classified them as rehearsers or non-rehearsers, then gave them tasks

  39. B & R, 2000 • Results • High functioning children with ASD showed strategy use, especially in open task • Moderate ASD group had less rehearsers, but again more in the open task • Also: higher verbal abilities = more strategy use • However: strategy use still lower than expected given their VMA

  40. Metamemory in ASD • Underscores importance of the task demands again • Serial recall demands may have over-loaded them

  41. Accounting for strategy development… • Why do they sometimes use them and sometimes not? • Why do they sometimes benefit and sometimes not? • Why do they revert from less to more sophisticated and more to less sophisticated?

  42. Siegler’s Adaptive Strategy Choice Model • Children use strategies at all points in time during development (all kinds available) • The difference is in the choice of strategy • Adding example: sum vs min vs fact retrieval • When one fails, child can fall back on older strategy • Development occurs in a series of overlapping waves

  43. Strat. 3 Strat. 1 Strat. 4 Use Strat. 2 Age

  44. Cost of strategy use • Will it use up space? • Do they have the space?

  45. Case’s theory of processing efficiency Younger Child Older Child Operating Space Storage Space Operating Space Storage Space

  46. Siegler’s ASCM • Feature of variability • Feature of integration • Siegler gives child a lot of credit…

  47. Good information processing model Good thinking processes Motivation capacity metamemory Knowledge base strategies

  48. Using this model, Pressley et al. noted 3 stages of knowledge instruction: • Specific strategy knowledge • Relational knowledge • General strategy knowledge

More Related