1 / 43

George W. Holcomb, III, M.D., MBA Surgeon-in-Chief Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Missouri

Current Thoughts About Laparoscopic Fundoplication in Infants and Children CIPESUR Meeting Uruguay 2011. George W. Holcomb, III, M.D., MBA Surgeon-in-Chief Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Missouri. Gastroesophageal Reflux. GER – presence of gastroesophageal reflux

bikita
Download Presentation

George W. Holcomb, III, M.D., MBA Surgeon-in-Chief Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Missouri

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Current Thoughts About Laparoscopic Fundoplication in Infants and ChildrenCIPESUR MeetingUruguay 2011 George W. Holcomb, III, M.D., MBA Surgeon-in-Chief Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Missouri

  2. Gastroesophageal Reflux GER – presence of gastroesophageal reflux GERD – symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux • Wt loss/FTT • ALTE • Pulmonary Sxs., RAD • Esophagitis: pain, stricture, Barrett’s

  3. GERDBarriers to Mucosal Injury • Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) • Esophageal IAL • Angle of His • Esophageal motility

  4. What Do We Know Now That We Did Not Know in 2000?

  5. Preoperative Evaluation • 24 hr pH study – gold standard in many centers • Only measures acid reflux • Impedance – acid & alkaline reflux • Upper GI contrast study -reflux seen in only 30% • Endoscopy - visualization only not sensitive • Endoscopy with biopsy – probably most sensitive • Gastric emptying study ? – not performed at initial operation • Esophageal motility study - not needed in children?

  6. Children’s Mercy Hospital (Jan 2000 – June 2007) 843 fundoplications ( 3.6% op. vol.) UGI – 656 pts pH study – 379 pts Sensitivity UGI – 30.8% AAP, 2009 J Pediatr Surg 45:1169-1172, 2010

  7. Children’s Mercy Hospital UGI – 656 pts Abnormality (other than GER) – 30 pts (4.5%) Suspected malrotation – 26 pts (4.0%) AAP, 2009 J Pediatr Surg 45:1169-1172, 2010

  8. Children’s Mercy Hospital Preoperative UGI – 656 pts Influences management - 4% Malrotation is the most common finding AAP, 2009 J Pediatr Surg 45:1169-1172,2010

  9. Preoperative EvaluationGastric Emptying Study ?

  10. GERDFundoplication Indications for operation (U.S.) • Failure of medical therapy • ALTE/weight loss in infants • Refractory pulmonary symptoms • Neurologically impaired child who needs gastrostomy

  11. Options for Fundoplication • Laparoscopic vs open • Complete (Nissen) vs Partial (Thal, Boix-Ochoa, Toupet)

  12. Laparoscopic Fundoplication Issues/Questions

  13. pCO2 • FRC • pH • pO2 Effects of Pneumoperitoneum • SVR • PVR • SV • CI • Venous Return (Head up)

  14. Proceed With Caution • VSD with reactive pulmonary HTN • CAVC – ( PVR 2o to pCO2, pO2, pH) • Neonates (in general) with reactive or persistent P-HTN • Palliated defects with passive pulmonary blood flow (Glenn, Fontan procedures) – Risk is pulmonary flow, reversal of flow thru shunt and clotting of shunt • Any defect adversely affected by SVR • HLHS • CHF (unrepaired septal defects: VSD, CAVC) • Risk is acute CHF 2o to afterload & shunting, unbalancing the defect

  15. Laparoscopic Fundoplication • Is dysphagia a common problem following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in infants and children?

  16. Intraoperative Bougie Sizes PAPS, 2002 J Pediatr Surg 37:1664-1666, 2002

  17. Laparoscopic Fundoplication • Can stab (3mm) incisions be used rather than cannulas for laparoscopic operations?

  18. Laparoscopic Fundoplication

  19. The Use of Stab Incisions 2000-2002 PAPS, 2003 JPS 38:1837-1840, 2003

  20. Laparoscopic Fundoplication • Is there a financial advantage with the laparoscopic approach when compared to the open operation?

  21. Clinical and Financial Analysis of Pediatric Laparoscopic versus Open Fundoplication100 Patients Total Charges Similar (LF - $11,449 OF - $11,632) IPEG 2006 J Lap Endosc Surg Tech 17:493-496,2007

  22. Laparoscopic Fundoplication5)Should the esophagus be extensively mobilized? Technique 2000 - 2002

  23. Current ThoughtsTechnique 2003 - 2010 • Less mobilization of esophagus • Keep peritoneal barrier b/w esophagus & crura

  24. Current Thoughts • Secure esophagus to crura at 8, 11, 1 and 4 o’clock

  25. Laparoscopic FundoplicationCurrent Technique - 2010 Please use this link if you experience problems viewing the video above.

  26. Why The Change in Technique?

  27. Personal Series - CMHJan 2000 – March 2002 Group I - 130 Pts No Esophagus – Crural Sutures Extensive Esophageal Mobilization Mean age/weight 21 mo/10 kg Mean operative time 93 minutes Transmigration wrap 15 (12%) Postoperative dilation 0 APSA, 2006 J Pediatr Surg 42:25-30, 2007

  28. Personal Series - CMHApril 2002 – December 2004 Group II - 119 Pts Esophagus – Crural Sutures Minimal Esophageal Mobilization Mean age/weight 27 mo/11 kg Mean operative time 102 minutes Transmigration wrap 6 (5%) Postoperative dilation 1 APSA, 2006 J Pediatr Surg 42:25-30, 2007

  29. Summary The relative risk of wrap transmigration in patients without esophago-crural sutures and with extensive esophageal mobilization was 2.29 times the risk if these sutures were utilized and if minimal esophageal dissection was performed.

  30. Group II119 PatientsEsophago-Crural Sutures # PatientsTransmigration% 2 silk sutures 20 5 25% (9, 3 o’clock) 3 silk sutures 43 1 2.3% (9, 12, 3 o’clock) 4 silk sutures 56 0 0% (8, 11, 1, 4 o’clock)

  31. Patients Less Than 60 Months The relative risk of transmigration of the wrap is 2.03 times greater for Group I than for Group II APSA, 2006 J Pediatr Surg 42:25-30, 2007

  32. Patients Less Than 24 Months The relative risk of transmigration of the wrap is 1.94 times greater for Group I than for Group II APSA, 2006 J Pediatr Surg 42:25-30, 2007

  33. Prospective, Randomized Trial • 2 Institutions: CMH, CH-Alabama • Power analysis using retrospective data (12% vs 5%) : 360 patients • Primary endpoint -- transmigration rate • 2 groups: minimal vs. extensive esophageal dissection • Both groups received esophago-crural sutures • Stratified for neurological status • UGI contrast study one year post-op • APSA, 2010

  34. Minimal vs Extensive Esophageal Mobilization During Laparoscopic Fundoplication Preoperative Demographics 177 Patients APSA, 2010 J PediatrSurg 43:163-169, 2011

  35. Minimal vs Extensive Esophageal Mobilization During Laparoscopic Fundoplication Results 177 Patients APSA, 2010 J PediatrSurg 43:163-169, 2011

  36. Current Study • Analysis (80% power,α- 0.05) – 110 patients • Minimal esophageal dissection in all patients • 4 esophago-crural sutures vs. no sutures

  37. No Esophago-crural Sutures Please use this link if you experience problems viewing the video above.

  38. Operative ResultsOpen Operations

  39. Re-Do Fundoplication(Personal Series) • Jan 00 – March 02 15/130 Pts – 12% • April 02 – December 06 7/184 Pts – 3.8% J Pediatr Surg 42:1298-1301, 2007

  40. Re-Do Fundoplication(Personal Series) 22 Pts (2000 – 2006) • All but one had transmigration of wrap • Mean age initial operation – 12.6 (±5.8) mos • 11 had gastrostomy • Mean time b/w initial operation & 1st redo – 14.1 (±1.7) mos • F/U – Minimum -19 mos Mean - 34 mos J Pediatr Surg 42:1298-1301, 2007

  41. Re-Do Fundoplication21/249Pts • SIS – 8: no recurrences • No SIS – 13 • 4 recurrences (31%)

  42. SIS and Paraesophageal Hernia Repair • Multicenter, prospective randomized trial • 108 patients • Recurrence: 7% vs 25% (1o repair) • No mesh related complications Oelschlager BK, et al Ann Surg 244:481-490, 2006 ASA Meeting, 2006

  43. QUESTIONS www.cmhclinicaltrials.com www.cmhmis.com

More Related